... i've seen this in Nikon D80 thread .. hurmm
Canon PowerShot S3 IS
Canon PowerShot S3 IS
|
|
Dec 6 2007, 04:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
972 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur |
... i've seen this in Nikon D80 thread .. hurmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 6 2007, 08:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
357 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
mine to share too
![]() |
|
|
Dec 6 2007, 01:19 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
69 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(superdav007 @ Dec 5 2007, 01:17 PM) thx, so easy only |
|
|
Dec 6 2007, 04:27 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
172 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
can tis diffuser use on S3 camera also? ^^
|
|
|
Dec 6 2007, 05:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
Dec 8 2007, 12:32 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
172 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
mmm...
can ask u guys who own S3.. if wanna shoot indoor shot what mode should i put... coz i jz new about this camera...and i hard to find a good exposure if i use M mode... can anyone give advice.. ^^ thx |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2007, 12:49 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur |
i just come back from MidValley (nice christmas decoration there)
I found when i use AV around 4 to 5, the shutter speed quite slow and make my photo result blur blur.. hua.. make me want to upgrade to DSLR (but no money) and show i see that the photo result is not sharp enough.. FYI i use ISO 100 (noticeable noise already so i didnt use ISO 200), i didnt use flash oso any advice guysss ?? |
|
|
Dec 9 2007, 02:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,477 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
QUOTE(dicxz80 @ Dec 9 2007, 12:49 AM) i just come back from MidValley (nice christmas decoration there) use ISO 200, 400, or even 800,I found when i use AV around 4 to 5, the shutter speed quite slow and make my photo result blur blur.. hua.. make me want to upgrade to DSLR (but no money) and show i see that the photo result is not sharp enough.. FYI i use ISO 100 (noticeable noise already so i didnt use ISO 200), i didnt use flash oso any advice guysss ?? aperture set to widest(lowest f-number), get ur hand stedy. A noisy but proper exposed photo looks better that a severe blured and underexposed photo. This post has been edited by mindkiller6610: Dec 9 2007, 02:14 AM |
|
|
Dec 9 2007, 05:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(dicxz80 @ Dec 9 2007, 12:49 AM) i just come back from MidValley (nice christmas decoration there) Only ISO200 or more is acceptable when I was there:I found when i use AV around 4 to 5, the shutter speed quite slow and make my photo result blur blur.. hua.. make me want to upgrade to DSLR (but no money) and show i see that the photo result is not sharp enough.. FYI i use ISO 100 (noticeable noise already so i didnt use ISO 200), i didnt use flash oso any advice guysss ?? Exposure: 1/60 sec Aperture: f/3.5 ISO: 200 Flash fired |
|
|
Dec 13 2007, 05:09 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
158 posts Joined: May 2006 |
just wanna to ask what is the market price for canon s5is?
and may i know the ISO200 is better or ISO800 is better? i mean higher better or lower better |
|
|
Dec 13 2007, 06:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2007, 10:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,120 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Malacca! ....now SG |
hm... S3 IS even with ISO400 will look noisy with a full sized image. i would try to stay up to ISO200. ISO800 would be much,much noisier...
can anyone share their creativity with the origami diffuser on S3 IS? taken on MAS, returning from Tokyo This post has been edited by keii-kun: Dec 14 2007, 10:38 PM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Dec 15 2007, 04:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 15 2007, 09:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,114 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: PJ, Selangor |
Hey abang kei kunn! So hows the trip to Tokyo? I'm going on February next year. Any idea if the Canon DSLRs there's cheaper? just curious cause i thought of getting one there. From what i heard they are selling RM1700 for a 400D kit. Hehe. =]
|
|
|
Dec 16 2007, 12:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,120 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Malacca! ....now SG |
cheap? hm... not really lah.. lemme get you some example.
IXY910IS launched in Japan , early Sept 07. Launched in Msia as IXUS 860IS , end of Sept 07 selling there at BIC CAMERA (one of famous Duty Free shop) 46,900Yen which translates for RM1350 (roughly), limited warranty. standard gift. got back in Msia, a shop in Lowyat (2nd floor) Selling RM1370 with tripod, case, bag and 2GB sd... If you are looking for lense, maybe they are cheaper , i guess. Unless, I could not find the best place to get cheap camera well, RM1.7K for a 400D kit is damn cheap This post has been edited by keii-kun: Dec 16 2007, 12:13 PM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Dec 18 2007, 03:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,766 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Valley |
Recently I bump into a very interesting read about comparison between S3/S5 and DSLR. For those who's owning a S3/S5, and envy those having DSLR but can't afford one, check out the thread below and you may feel better
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat...thread=26042534 |
|
|
Dec 20 2007, 01:30 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
214 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
wa, our topic go down to page 2
bump it with my new pic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Dec 20 2007, 02:02 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
85 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
is a good dslr camera.
|
|
|
Dec 20 2007, 04:33 PM
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(kelvinyam @ Dec 18 2007, 03:16 PM) Recently I bump into a very interesting read about comparison between S3/S5 and DSLR. For those who's owning a S3/S5, and envy those having DSLR but can't afford one, check out the thread below and you may feel better It seems more like a thread for sore losers who can't afford a DSLR trying hard to convince themselves that they made a good choice for choosing S3 / S5 IS over DSLR. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat...thread=26042534 QUOTE(ling13140 @ Dec 20 2007, 02:02 PM) No it's S3 IS is not a DSLR. It's a prosumer. |
|
|
Dec 20 2007, 09:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
357 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
hey vichio, very nice shotting !!!
|
| Change to: | 0.0270sec
1.47
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 03:01 PM |