QUOTE(Evogenix @ Sep 26 2006, 09:54 PM)
your new 24/7 settings? mind posting the voltages used and id'e and load temps? Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo Overclocking Board, Report your issues/results here.
Intel® Core(tm)2 Duo Overclocking Board, Report your issues/results here.
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 10:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#81
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 12:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#82
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 12:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#83
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 09:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#84
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Sep 27 2006, 08:09 PM) Performance per watt...true lar.. Conroe cannot be touched except by Merom Haha, guess what, my electric bill increased by 70 bucks after I start OC-ing my baby, guess I can't run on OC-ed settings 24/7 now.I just took some measurements at the mains... My current spec (as per siggy) running stock with C1E and IEST enabled: Idle --> 160W Prime load --> 202W Compared with my Winchester at 2.4Ghz CnQ on..DFI Ultra D..both vcore and vdimm also got add.....rest of the spec being same.. Idle --> 121W Prime load --> 161W ps: Damn..and I was planning to save electricity. |
|
|
Sep 28 2006, 12:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#85
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
QUOTE(X10A Freedom @ Sep 28 2006, 12:23 AM) guys, i enabled eist and c1e, but the clock doesn't seem to be throttling down at all............even after 10 minutes not moving any at all EIST only throttle the multiplier thus affecting clock speed. FSB frequency is untouched though.any idea wat happen? is it because i already set the vcore manually that it won't throttle down? |
|
|
Sep 28 2006, 01:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#86
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28 2006, 01:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#87
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
Sep 28 2006, 01:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#88
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
QUOTE(Bliz @ Sep 28 2006, 01:35 AM) The Intel Speedstep is not working very well at all, compare to AMD 1 can throttle down about 1ghz from the default speed. Last time i OC my 3000+ to 2.25ghz then idle only running at 1ghz, this intel 1 only decrease the multiplier by 1, like no effect This is because E6300 has multipliers (6-7) where 6 is the lowest possible. For other conroe models, guess they have larger range of downwards throttling compared to E6300. |
|
|
Sep 28 2006, 08:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#89
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 12:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#90
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
QUOTE(xcrue @ Sep 29 2006, 12:48 AM) If OC it, sure hot la Btw, AFAIK C2D is hotter when compared to the correspond model of AMD x2 as the IHS of most (or maybe just a few batch) C2D procesors are concaved thus resulting in poor heat conductivity to the heatsink. |
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 05:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#91
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 05:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#92
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 05:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#93
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
QUOTE(gengstapo @ Sep 29 2006, 05:23 PM) yeah just now, but what make me sick is, i bought DS3 again how much do you pay fro your E6600? im lookin for the cheapop Biostar but all LYP unavailable, no choice.. Haha, you shouldn't let go your DS3 at the first place, it is a good board what This post has been edited by blaxez: Sep 29 2006, 05:33 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30 2006, 04:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#94
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
QUOTE(xcrue @ Sep 30 2006, 04:27 PM) Hey guys...good NEW!! you mean core 2 quad aka kentsfield? this is old news dudeFORTH CORE cpu is coming out end of this year,my fren from INTEL told me that they r going to US for the project. He juz b from US for his Core 2 dual project, recently theyve start distributing Core2 dual CPu for DELL's laptop |
|
|
Oct 2 2006, 04:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#95
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
Oct 3 2006, 08:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#96
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
QUOTE(kcnyc @ Oct 3 2006, 02:59 AM) I am getting about 68C+ on full load on stock heatsink. If you look in the SuperPi 1M overclocking database, you will have some sort of indication of the temps you should get when overclocked. jarofclay is on stock heatsink even though his chip is at 3.9GHz+. Sniperontheroof was using 1.65V for his 4GHz overclock and still no 80C temp. 1.65V is super high, and it should be quite toasty - but still no 80C. And they are all living in Malaysia. sniper on the roof is in taipei Gengstapo, is the ventilation in the case good? |
|
|
Oct 3 2006, 11:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#97
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
|
Oct 5 2006, 08:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#98
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
How to determine the chips used in RAMs without taking off the heatspreader?
|
|
|
Oct 5 2006, 08:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#99
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
QUOTE(kcnyc @ Oct 5 2006, 09:07 AM) I don't think you can. You can probably guess, but to be absolutely sure, you have to take a look under the heatspreader. What DDR do you have blaxez? Corsair VS 667, as far as I know, the chips are square in shape, I don't want to remove the heatspreader as the thermal tape looks quite fragile and don't want to ruin it. |
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 08:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#100
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,885 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Sydney / Penang |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0214sec
0.79
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 12:27 PM |