QUOTE(Flizzardo @ Jul 20 2017, 02:22 PM)
thats no even the correct way to use double jeopardy, it makes completely no sense
doesnt matter if you are a sole owner or not taking out item without paying will just cause deficit in closing and stock count and also encourage your staff to steal because it just make everything jumble up and untraceable
that is why i say put it under operation cost. of course you have to set a good example, but those excess can be treated as part of employee benefit like late night snacks so even though in the end they cannot be sold they can be counted as part of expenditure.doesnt matter if you are a sole owner or not taking out item without paying will just cause deficit in closing and stock count and also encourage your staff to steal because it just make everything jumble up and untraceable
by buying from your fully owned business it cost you more for that piece of roti that you just paid for. small item ok, but big item like petrol i'm sure you put it under company benefit/expenditure right?
or you actually pay for your own petrol?
if not fully own then better just pay, if not other shareholder may abuse it, even if you give them a company petrol card.
Jul 20 2017, 02:27 PM

Quote
0.0191sec
1.37
5 queries
GZIP Disabled