Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The new Nissan Sylphy 2014, Coming soon

views
     
cybermaster98
post Apr 16 2014, 01:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


Did i see 129Hp, 174Nm torque? If so, its about 10Hp less than the Civic 1.8S plus with a CVT gearbox, ure gonna find serious lag. The same problem the new Honda City is facing now. But maybe the XCVT is better?
cybermaster98
post Apr 16 2014, 01:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 16 2014, 11:18 AM)
Current Sylphy 2.0 is really a powerful car, down side is the outlook is not really widely acceptable but I'm ok with the 2012 facelift.
131Hp, 191Nm torque makes the current Sylphy really powerful? Compared to what? rclxub.gif
cybermaster98
post Apr 16 2014, 02:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 16 2014, 02:01 PM)
So u r talking about spec base on paper? Go get a test drive and share your experience.
I have. Hence my response to your statement earlier.

So which cars did you compare against when you said the current Sylphy is really powerful?
cybermaster98
post Apr 16 2014, 03:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 16 2014, 02:07 PM)
There is no comparison required, this is from my own experience and it is really powerful enough to handle the car at this size and weight.

Ask the rest of the Sylphy owners here, who is gonna tell u the current 2.0 Sylphy is underpower?
Now this is where you are contradicting yourself a bit. biggrin.gif

Earlier you said 'really powerful'. But now you are saying 'really powerful enough'. Really powerful and powerful enough are 2 totally different things. I agree that the Sylphy is powerful enough for its body weight but is surely not 'really powerful'. Wrong choice of words i guess.

And somehow ure also saying that i claimed the Sylphy is 'underpowered'. Did i ever say it was underpowered? Nope.

Trust that has cleared the confusion.


cybermaster98
post Apr 16 2014, 04:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 16 2014, 03:39 PM)
come on kid, make the discussion constructive, please dont bash here and there. I said it is powerful and I'm still saying that it is. Period.
Kid? doh.gif

It is constructive. You made a mistake in your choice of words which gave a totally different meaning. Period back. biggrin.gif
cybermaster98
post Apr 17 2014, 11:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(slaveone @ Apr 17 2014, 11:07 AM)
Bro, I'm not kpop youngsters, but I know dull interior or not. That's one of the factor that I choose pug 308 instead of FFocus (last gen)

But if this interior is you cup of tea, I have no problem with that
Yes most ppl think that only youngsters will not like the interior. Im not some kid as well and even i dont like the interior. Really old fashioned and uncle looking. Even the exterior design isnt catchy. Even the fugly Camry looks better in this aspect.

But the Sylphy is a very comfortable car to be in. Very good legroom, good sound insulation and comfortable suspension. If you want comfort, this is the car to go for if u can sacrifice looks. biggrin.gif
cybermaster98
post Apr 17 2014, 11:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 17 2014, 11:41 AM)
I have to agree that the interior is towards uncle design. My first time ride on this sylphy was back to 2011 and I have the same feeling on the interior the very first moment I stepped in the car but as soon as I tested the ride comfort and good NVH, the outlook and Interior can be "ignored" laugh.gif
If Nissan can just redesign the dashboard to a more futuristic design, it should be sufficient.
cybermaster98
post Apr 17 2014, 01:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 17 2014, 12:49 PM)
You dont have to feel sorry, the Sylphy owners are majority very glad of the purchase I believe.
You should feel sorry that you have missed out a great car by judging on the surface.
Besides Proton and Perodua, can you tell me which recent new car model was not majority liked by their own owners?
cybermaster98
post Apr 17 2014, 01:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 17 2014, 01:24 PM)
From my network, VW mechatronic complains, Honda City 2006 CVT problem, Forte high fuel consumption, VW Polo TSI DSG.
Those are from my friends and colleagues, not to bash the car brand or model.
Common la friend. Ure refering to issues with the models. Does this mean that majority of those owners are generally not satisfied with their cars?

Porsche issued a worldwide recall this year to all 911 GT3's due to a serious fire risk. Does this mean that MAJORITY of Porsche owners are NOT SATISFIED with their cars? doh.gif
cybermaster98
post Apr 17 2014, 01:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 17 2014, 01:35 PM)
Lets continue to discuss about Sylphy related matters, do not off topic too much, if you would like to discuss about this comparison thingy on every statement that I made, I suggest that you create a new thread and discuss over there.
Well we are discussing the Sylphy. But i dont quite agree with some of your generalised statements. Its actually a bit misleading.
cybermaster98
post Apr 17 2014, 02:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(elvatra @ Apr 17 2014, 01:57 PM)
well just abit curious on it... r u anyway a slyphy owner?
Nope. Do i need to be one?
cybermaster98
post Apr 17 2014, 02:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(jehutyz @ Apr 17 2014, 02:22 PM)
Nissan Sylphy

1.8E - RM 115k
1.8VL - RM 125k
Difference in specs?
cybermaster98
post Apr 17 2014, 03:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(elvatra @ Apr 17 2014, 02:41 PM)
No man... is just curiosity kill the cats. due to ur exprience talks, i was thinking u r one of the owner. and maybe we met before in tc sc. thats all.. cheers man.. not hard feelings. after all at here we are just to share and discuss. not bash around right? i believe that from discussion we share alots of knowledge thus we know what is good for our ride.
Glad you share the same sentiments. Keep it up. rclxms.gif
cybermaster98
post Apr 17 2014, 04:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


Well the new Sylphy is surely much better looking than the current model. At least from the outside. biggrin.gif
cybermaster98
post Apr 18 2014, 09:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


I think i quite like this new Sylphy. Clearly a few steps above the previous models. Much better external design and seems that Nissan have in fact redesigned the dashboard. And with its excellent comfort levels and ample legroom, i think this new Sylphy might actually do better than its rivals in the C segment.

Cant wait to test drive and check out the revised Xtronic CVT.

Any idea where in KL?
cybermaster98
post Apr 18 2014, 10:27 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(mango27 @ Apr 18 2014, 10:06 AM)
Mazda 3 CBU at 139k... who will buy the 1.8VL? 9k more can get 2.0 skyactive and much nicer interior+exterior...
Did you get your math correct? 139K vs 125K is 14K difference. Yes the Mazda3 has a more powerful 2.0L engine but it doesnt have the specs and the comfort levels that the Sylphy offers for sure.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Apr 18 2014, 10:33 AM
cybermaster98
post Apr 21 2014, 10:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 19 2014, 07:28 AM)
Additional info that worth mentioning.
Low spec using hand brake, high spec using foot brake.
Car lock n unlock with beep sound
That foot brake is actually a bit irritating. Should have provided electric parking brake. biggrin.gif
cybermaster98
post Apr 21 2014, 10:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lowyatguy @ Apr 21 2014, 10:27 AM)
Correction should have been made on the above statement as both variants are using handbrake.

I still prefer "physical" brake, too much of electronic stuffs makes me feel like "unreal"  blush.gif
So both have hand brake? OK then.

Well, you need to evolve with the times. Electronic brake is quite good actually. You dont need to disengage the brake when you move at traffic light stops. Its automatically disengages when you press the accelerator.

The only problem arises when you drive a car without these features after that. whistling.gif
cybermaster98
post Apr 21 2014, 11:08 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(feelfree @ Apr 21 2014, 10:51 AM)
Yesterday went to test drive both the Altis and Sylphy, the conclusion is Slyphy has a more solid chassis and more silence than Altis. One thing I noticed on the Altis is the gear-changed for the Altis is more aggressive and sportier, but not as smooth as the Sylphy. for handling, I think both almost the same, but really much better then their last gen. But if you really want to find a winner, I would choose the Sylphy any time because of the more solid chassis which is really nice to drive, you can sense more road feedback from the chassis, but not the steering, while Altis ride is too blur and vague both chassis and steering.
How did you test handling? Where did you test both? Exact location?
cybermaster98
post Apr 23 2014, 11:34 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Apr 23 2014, 11:12 AM)
Looking for me? Do you always get into serious accident involving trucks? 2 airbags can still pass the minimum required safety.

Since no test drive yet, can only evaluate based on specs. Have you launch your Sentra yet? It's getting old the longer you wait.

the new engine MRA8DE dual VVT (79.7 x 90.1 undersquare) torque is good at 174Nm.

Looks is outdated, size wise also behind the upgraded C-segment size league, still stuck with Civic.
Wheelbase 2,700
Length x Width x Height - 4,625 x 1,760 x 1,496

The new CVT comes with larger ratio this time, at least an improvement over the previous weak gearbox. But still, it's a CVT gearbox rather than solid reliable and durable conventional advanced AT gearbox that is now superior.

If you let me choose between new Sentra or Civic, I would pick this over Civic. Compared to other C-segments, if I had money, Mazda 3 ofcourse. 2nd choice will be Elantra followed by Cerato then Focus and Altis.

Looks like your colleague FeelFree is trying hard to market the car here. New Sentra vs Altis, I'll take Altis because of its proven reliability and size. Dislike the new Sentra look that resembles obsolete Korean cars that have been phased out several years ago.
What size u talking about la? Interior space the Sylphy thrashed the Civic and Altis. Have u sat in one before? Suggest you do.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0423sec    0.72    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 01:21 PM