Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMDŽ Socket-AM2 Overclocking thread, discuss our setup/overclocking issues

views
     
duarnt
post Feb 27 2007, 11:46 PM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(mr_habuk @ Feb 27 2007, 04:59 PM)
sighh..anybody can help me solving my problem?? icon_question.gif
*
Mine still ok never encounter that problem. What program can do burn in as sandra?
duarnt
post Feb 28 2007, 02:34 PM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(mr_habuk @ Feb 28 2007, 08:25 AM)
abg duarnt dh oc blom??
*
Right now mild O/C only. I did try 333 fsb with i-dont-remember-the-multiplier. Maybe multi 8. Ram timing obviously quite loose. 5-5-5-15 2t and some other options which im not familiar with. tongue.gif

Any diff performance between these two?

266 x 10

333 x 8

Both will be around 2.66ghz i know but does the different in fsb can boost anything?

This post has been edited by duarnt: Feb 28 2007, 02:40 PM
duarnt
post Feb 28 2007, 04:18 PM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(soulfly @ Feb 28 2007, 04:02 PM)
no different because FSB does not exist. there is no such thing as FSB in K8 architecture.

however you might wanna check which combination gives higher memory speed
*
hmmm ok and thanks reminding about the FSB thinggy
duarnt
post Mar 1 2007, 12:05 AM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


RM680 so not terasa?? U must be rich tongue.gif
duarnt
post Mar 1 2007, 05:10 PM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(treason @ Mar 1 2007, 02:29 PM)
hey guys

im at 255 fsb now with my x2 3600+...problem is my ram divider is at 400....if i go higher it wont even go to the bios, and there will b 1 long beep and 2 short beeps...i tried to set my multiplier lower and fsb higher, also cannot..y ar? not enough vdim? its at 1.95v (board max)

thanks!!
*
Loosen the ram timing maybe? My previous m2n-e is use divider 667 able to stable around 820 with 1.9~1.95 but timing quite loose.

This post has been edited by duarnt: Mar 1 2007, 05:12 PM
duarnt
post Mar 2 2007, 11:34 AM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(treason @ Mar 1 2007, 07:19 PM)
thanks for the reply guys!

Mr habuk,
Set at 100 adi....only when i adjust the ram divider or timing the beep will come out..

pws
I can super-pi as long as my ram divider is at 400...if change ram configuration only cannot...means vcore should b enough rite?

8tvt,
my multiplier is at x4...ok will try x3 instead, thanks!

duarnt,
ermmm how loose is loose? im using corsair xms2 pc5400....at 5-5-5-15 2t adi..hahhaa

normally 2.6Ghz need around how much vcore r? 1.5 like that?

I very tempted to sell my m2n-e for a biostar tforce 570 nowlar..hahaha around rm310 now at low yat yesterday...550 is 290...
*
Ill post a bit about my previous setup later tonight or u can try searching this thread. Somebody already posted about the timings, i just forgot which pages tongue.gif
duarnt
post Mar 8 2007, 10:16 AM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


Hahaha all 3800++ user quite 'threaten' @ envy by ur amazing SuperPI score tongue.gif Btw just clear the file and run again but from the 1mb test already shown the real score from ur proc.
duarnt
post May 28 2007, 10:13 AM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


I O/C mine to 2.6Ghz, prime and orthos stable then i enable CnQ. After enabling the CPU freq down by 50% to 1.3Ghz idle. When playing games it will raise up to 2.4ghz~2.5ghz. I've not encountered any BoD or hanging and its rock solid. I thought enabling CnQ could cause those thing? Anyway i like the condition now, a lot less heat generated from the cheap PSU laugh.gif
duarnt
post May 28 2007, 05:17 PM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(lohwenli @ May 28 2007, 11:20 AM)
CnQ can be unstable when overclocking because it also reduces processor voltage in addition to reducing the clock frequency. It does it in steps, no sudden jumps from 50% to full clock speed. After overclocking, sometimes some of the default voltage settings in the intermediate steps will not function well anymore-too low to be stable at overclocked settings.

However, sometimes you may just be lucky. In my case, not so. Games which do not fully load the processor but still do more than 50% load cause CnQ to switch the processor from full speed to partial (but still more than 50%) many times a second due to the game's constantly varying load. Eventually, the system crashed. Currently I use CystalCPUID to create  a form of manual CnQ, which undervolts and underclocks the processor at idle, and restores it to normal speed (with slight undervolting) at moderate load, and overclocked (with overvolting) at full load.
*
I was expecting a crashed but still ok under normal/gaming usage for the moment. thumbup.gif
duarnt
post May 30 2007, 11:07 PM

Sux!
*****
Senior Member
961 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cyberjaya


QUOTE(mfa333 @ May 30 2007, 10:42 PM)
sorry for quoting old post... anyone using CoreTemp here?

is it core0+core1 temp= cpu temp? hmm.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
i dont owned brisbane but the temp look to good to be true sweat.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0415sec    0.37    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 10:04 AM