Again, same like the Fulham game. A game of 2 halves. First half we were mediocre, second half we stepped up. With some helping hand from Spurs' players, we managed to score 4.

KTBFFH!

all the 4 goals really come from their individual errors..haha
continue trashing teams with lots of goal, then we dont have to worry even if city won their remaining games in hand

good win anyway. night lads !

Thrashing Villa 8 nil should do the trick?

Well.let's just say we pressured them into making mistakes.should've been 2 nil up in the first half anyway

Agree all goal from spurs individuals error but it does not mean we played poor.we play very well on 2nd half.

831 pundits look very mad.he must be a spurs fan,cannot accept the defeat.

This post has been edited by lol~: Mar 9 2014, 03:32 AM

shebby? dat guy is spurs fan iinm.

hahahahahhaa ba nearly scored a hattrick

awesome pressure from the team..ajat penalty..can challenge lampsy already..

Hehe we keep piling up pressures on city.

of course, the lads fully capitalize from their errors. chelsea deserved to win this game

Dez Corkhill right? Not sure if he's a spurs fan but definitely not a Chelsea fan. Said that all our goals came from errors, which is partly true. But you also have to finish it when error is presented to you.

dez corkril. dunno exact spelling.

Lel having making error against top teams is asking for trouble.
Capitalising those error also need skill.

This post has been edited by yinchet: Mar 9 2014, 03:45 AM

I noe this pundit, but not sure who he supports. afaik, shebby mcm spurs supporter.

Actually Ba's running off the ball was pretty good. Certainly looked determined to score,and his sharp instincts helped him bag two goals.

errors..own goals...anything I will take it anyday..no one ask them to do it..and credit for us to pressure them to the max.

up the blues..

i'm off..lepak jom !

hahahhaa

Dunno his name.shebby the indian guy right?

Btw oscar introduction change the game.good tactical change by mou

Better team won the game. With mistakes like that, obviously they are not the better team right?

Anyone good second half. We looked threatening to score 2nd goal and possibly even more before the red card.

3 points in bag. More pressure on MC.

Kudos to TS though. Excellent results he picked up since his appointment, doesn't deserve to lose 4-0. Best of luck to him.

Look at Tim Sherwood's face. The team gonna receive endless beatings in the locker room yo

imho, Lamps off and playing Ram in the pivot changed the game, not Oscar.

Ramires played better in pivot than at the wings. Oscar is just ok, not on his top form yet. Could've scored but his shot went 'rugby' style. But still, Oscar did the usual work, which is to pressurize Spurs defenders and midfield when they have the ball. This led to faster possession change.

Lamps kept looking to pass instead of dribbling it upfield. With Ram in the pivot, he tends to dribble more, that means he has the support of the trident and striker up front. With Lamps, that's not the case.

This post has been edited by briantwj: Mar 9 2014, 03:48 AM

great strategy from mourinho to introduce oscar in the second half. pressuring spurs centre mid and oscar somehow regained some of his performance. good off the ball to open up spurs defence, tracking back, pressuring opponents and good going up.

although the win was because of the spurs defensive errors but it was also because of chelsea up their tempo and pressuring the spurs defence that lead to the defensive error.