many ppl being mislead with those camera manufacturer that playing the psychology with more megapixel mean better photos quality.

in actual, it does not mean so, unless you are a person that always want to crop the photo you take or you want to print a photo at the actual size of that large megapixel you take.

if you view a photo on a Full HD monitor which hv the maximum resolution of 1080 x 1920, a 2MP photo already more than the monitor can show at 100%.
so, even you view a 16MP photo on a Full HD monitor, you still have the same quality as viewing a 2MP photo.
As that is the max the monitor can display.
Unless you have the Ultra HD with 4K resolution of 2160 x 3840 then maybe you need at least 10MP to fully utilize the screen.

stormlcc also mentioned that the size is the main concern with more megapixel. the more megapixel you have with your camera, the bigger the file size.
the bigger the file size mean bigger storage you need and the more time you need to load the photo.

why waste storage, loading time for more megapixel photo that you mostly will only view on yr HP or even on yr TV or PC monitor that is only Full HD size?

Well said.

Personally I would prefer modern day phones to feature lesser megapixels as theoretical it would mean better light sensitivity as individual pixels would have higher surface area exposed to light transmission. This theoretically also translates to higher dynamic range and lower noise.

Anyhow, I don't use my phone for capturing anything serious as I have another system for that. But I would say that the Nexus 5's camera is decent

hmmm~~I always use greenify since I use android.

the guide says no hibernators??

Testing the LTE speeds on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur.. Faster than my UniFi at home haha!



Edit = I'm on prepaid plan subscribed to the 1GB

I don understand the relation between pricing and a better camera algo n user interface.

AFAIK apple develops IOS google develops ANDROID.

although I do not need USB or fast charging. I just do a testing and feedback. I'm not sure is kernel issue or what. I got the same thing via my regular USB port from lappy, only USB charging show even I enable fast charge.

googling some feedback, mostly said:"The cable can make big difference..." after they testing several different USB cable. I gonna try to search any shorter cable to test tonight.....

so for now the conclusion is cable??im using their stock cable><

okay means not my problem....is cable issh. anyway my last experience with cheap cable not that good oo. burnt my fuggin iphone 5 logic board. PAIN IN DA ASS. well if that didnt happen I wouldnt come back to Android. One incident leads to another haha.

this long time ago kan?? got dedicated thread lagi. cannot subscribe long ago><

im on surfmore 75 hehe. thinking to go for surfmore 50. everywhere also wifi now.

no problem.

will applying screen protector affect it?

On second thoughts, if both the liquipel shock absorbing and water-resistant layers work as they advertised, there won't be any need for phone cases anymore 

the entire market for phone cases will come crashing down..

Wow didn't know about the shock absorb on liquipel.. saw the waterproof though at last year CES 2013.

Definitely interested to what the company can offer more in the future.

I won't call that being smart . More like a suicide move. haha. Also if any of the big companies would offer this with thr phones, price will be increased. Since this tech is still new they will charge us end consumers a lot and pay likeee sheettt to Liquipel guys since they're new. Yeah business world is a b****

Interesting ... didnt know Malaysia have people carries them. Just wondering the damage of this ...