QUOTE(toh2020 @ Jan 12 2014, 11:01 AM)
MyKLTalks, we appreciate you are more sensitive to the needs of the community. the process in getting things done should be made as transparent and easiest possible.
there are discussion about hearings. members got their notification later after hearing. this is not right thing dbkl to address issue. so there must be room for improvement or other way round. doing this give overall picture dbkl wants the hike badly via daylight robbery. how you can change that?
it's either you do it right or give your company and client a real bad name together along bad creditability. so please think and act carefully.
All feedback are compiled and sent to DBKL, especially concerning the notice issue, which has been brought up by members here as well as in media reports.
Concerning the 'wanting the hike badly via daylight robbery', there are a few components to this - first is the quantum of the hike, which has been explained. DBKL assures that any increase in amount paid by property owners - especially for residential properties - will not be high. In some cases, some owners pay lower Assessment Rate as compared to the years before. In fact, there is a special incentive to even reduce the amount further for OKUs, retirees and owner-occupied properties. There will also be another announcement concerning this and we will post it as soon as the numbers and calculations tally during or after the negotiations concerning the Annual Value Revision public hearings.
Then there is the second component - the rationale why this is necessary. As is made transparent in all budget speeches since 2002 and the breakdown of expenditure and income of DBKL as well as the five-year projected income vs expenditure on our website, the city needs the funds to ensure sustainability of the city.
The information being disseminated are verified by DBKL. Any other types of leniency or negotiations between residents and DBKL are beyond the scope of the campaign. DBKL has been known to be open for negotiations with KL residents. As with any allegations of corruption or general inefficiencies. For that, we suggest the normal protocol of reporting.
We join you in your call for thinking and acting carefully as this is the future of the city we all live in, and there are rules and laws that must be adhered to.
It may be easy to get lost in the heat of an online forum, but try to think about it rationally and when in the real world - is the Cukai Pintu increased for all? Will it burden everyone, especially those who have less? There is a cost to maintain the city and hopefully members of the public will be more informed on how much it takes to actually maintain and develop a modern city such as KL.