QUOTE(teop @ Jan 3 2017, 04:27 PM)
Ahh, but the BFM ads actually tries to encourage people to read....
Anyway I have always enjoyed the details you put into your reply. Makes it so much better since not everyone can ask question properly or completely... otherwise this thread will become a rapid exchange of one line questions and answers.
Thanks for your kind reply. Appreciated it. It is already THE trend among everyone to express anything using the shortest possible sentence. I can understand why. Typing on the smartphone or the computer keyboard is tedious and time consuming.
Anyway, its okay for me when people used short sentence, one "liners", short forms, acronyms or whatever. The only problem here for me is to properly understand what the writer was trying to say. Hehehe, I can't read what is inside a person's mind.
I just "invent" an example... "Is my room big enough for HT? I have a HiFi system now." I think many of you DO know what additional info is needed to be mentioned after that question. Then, what happens next are back and forth replies which actually can be a bit time consuming loh. Use simple short sentences is absolutely okay but it should also have some common sense on what info must be mentioned too.
I am also guilty of giving wrong answers to a very simple and straight forward question. I did not use my common sense. A person asked... "which is better, Denon or Onkyo?" I answered Marantz. He clearly wants to know which of these two. He didn't ask people to suggest other brands. I should have replied Denon and should have given my personal reasons why. Hehehe... numerous people answered with Yamaha, Pioneer, etc making it even more confusing to the writer. Another thing is, there are people who simply answered this or that. Yes, just say its a personal opinion/preference and explain a bit on why that one is better. Example.... "Denon is my personal preference. Better vocals".... simple and short.
QUOTE(teop @ Jan 3 2017, 04:49 PM)
Isn't 3D TV on the way out? I did remember that a few manufacturer is on the exit. Maybe only for the very high-end? This will definitely hamper future 3D adoption by studios
More and more lower-end TVs/Projectors will not have 3D in the future?
Maybe you are right to say that, because of poor consumer acceptance or usage. With more and more TVs with 100+hz refresh rates and 60+ frames per second, I guess it may cost only a little extra to add in 3D so it may still appear in lower-end models. I am just assuming only. Similar question can also be asked about the TV Bluetooth feature. Do Bluetooth appear in only high-end models? How many of you actually do use your TV bluetooth? If many of us uses the TV Bluetooth, then such demand will ensure that this will continue to be included in the future, maybe more and more lower-end TVs will have it.
You said that less and less 3D TVs will hamper future 3D releases. Well... yes, I agree that we can't watch 3D blurays without 3D TV. I can also say "without 3D blurays", 3D becomes useless in 3D TV. Its just like a "chicken and egg" story, which comes first. I believe whether studios continue to produce 3Ds do not depend just on 3D TV or 3D blurays or 3D movies in cinemas... it depends solely on consumers continued support and without it, then 3D will be a past history. Even IF 3D totally disappears from the TV, I do suspect that it will still reappear again in the future.
Only time will tell whether lower-end TVs will not have 3D.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
I don't know whether 3D will disappear in the future or not. As long as they keep releasing 3D blurays and cinemas still continue playing 3D movies, then I think that 3D will still continue to live a bit longer.
Whether manufacturers will totally stop 3D TV production in the future will largely depend on the general audience. As long as there is a market that drives them to release 3D blurays and 3D movies, I suspect that 3D may never totally die, it just becomes greatly rare loh.
There was a time when in the 50s when 3D movies first came out and people at that time said that its just a fad that will not last. It became unpopular but it never actually died.
Then 3D reappeared in the cinemas again in the 80s.
One "fad" that did actually came out and later totally "died" was Sensurround which appeared in the 1974 film Earthquake. I do remember watching this movie in Federal Cinema KL where I felt the "vibration effects".
Additional Reading Info...
http://nypost.com/2015/03/18/the-3-d-fad-i...dnt-be-happier/https://entertainment-industry.knoji.com/th...s-of-the-1950s/http://stereoscopynews.com/hotnews/history...ite-3d-channelshttps://www.sky.com/help/articles/watch-sky-in-3dThis post has been edited by jamesleetech: Jan 4 2017, 10:58 PM