Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.23, National Geography edition

views
     
celciuz
post Dec 26 2013, 11:08 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Dec 26 2013, 11:07 PM)
Rain will loosen the adhesive meh?  shocking.gif

Aren't these things supposed to be weatherproof?
*
Don't know, but I think it would? LOL, and sweat too.
celciuz
post Dec 27 2013, 09:23 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(coolkwc @ Dec 27 2013, 08:10 AM)
IMO, camera replacement part/accessories most of them the pricing is unreasonable.

Last Sunday i saw the Nikon remote pricing, ridiculous high, just a button for shutter, RM290. shakehead.gif
I just use my handphone to remote only... yawn.gif  whistling.gif
*
Wait, your phone can remote control your DSLR? What model are both of them?
celciuz
post Dec 27 2013, 12:43 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(coolkwc @ Dec 27 2013, 09:29 AM)
DSLR is D3200...but Nikon shutter remote is universal, even u bought genuine remote is same for all Nikon DSLR.

Phone wise, galaxy S4...this phone got IR transmitter, just download free apps from google play then tata... laugh.gif
*
Ahh that's nice. I have one of those IR remote from Nikon, cost me about RM25 I think. But only works with D7100 and below I think. I was using with D90 back then.
celciuz
post Dec 27 2013, 03:26 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(coolkwc @ Dec 27 2013, 02:09 PM)
Maybe i read the price wrongly... blush.gif

The remote is genuine Nikon part, saw from camera shop.

Maybe just RM29.00, not 290... doh.gif
*
Unless what you saw is the radio trigger for D700 and above. But I think that cost much more.
celciuz
post Dec 30 2013, 11:57 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Dec 30 2013, 10:12 AM)
50 1.4G i think..  D would be fine too..see which one sharper.
ya right.. i almost forgot bout that. bt that's from crop body rite? if FF i think 1/80 enuf.
*
Its all about the pixel density now... FF like D800 has high pixel density, equivalent to the D7000. But then again, those 20+ MP DX sensors like D7100... is going to need even higher shutter than the D800.

That's why I still like my D700, 12MP FF very forgiving sensor on shake laugh.gif
celciuz
post Jan 4 2014, 11:16 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
All this bug photos makes me wanna shoot some too... time to hunt for lens xD
celciuz
post Jan 4 2014, 11:36 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Jan 4 2014, 11:25 PM)
haha jelly you all can buy unlimited lenses  tongue.gif
*
Nope, haven't been buying stuffs quite sometime le. laugh.gif
celciuz
post Jan 5 2014, 12:44 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Jan 5 2014, 12:11 AM)
105mm F2.8 VR sifu  brows.gif  brows.gif
Can also be used to shoot lengloi portraits during car shows also  brows.gif  brows.gif
*
I have 85 or 70200 for that purpose tongue.gif Plus the 105 focuses just too slow for these events shots.

QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jan 5 2014, 02:59 AM)
i tot u bought MBP 15 inch?
CY sifu has his 85mm 1.4G bokeh king.. i dun think he will shoot at 2.8 for portrait la..haha..

btw i see 200mm 1.8 photos.. bokeh is mad creamy bt then it looks super fake most of the time.  sweat.gif
200mm 2.8 enuf.
*
No wor... nah below f/5.6 tongue.gif
user posted image
Kyra feat. RX-8 by CY Pixels, on Flickr

QUOTE(amduser @ Jan 5 2014, 03:59 AM)
the restaurant there is closed, but not sure about access to public
the distance required to use 200mm is crazily far, unless you are doing half body shoot or headshot only

85 1.4/1.8 on the other hand has better balance between bokeh and DOF drool.gif

found this god lens for sell in facebook
Rm4600 - Nikon 24-70MM F2.8 G ED N, 97% like new, excellent condition. No fungus, no haze on glass. Superb lens for FX body.
https://www.facebook.com/KLDslr/posts/416209611842313:0

quite cheap i guess
*
If RM4600, I think I'll go for grey set with 12 months warranty teehee~
celciuz
post Jan 6 2014, 11:52 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
D800 seems like a bad camera for macro.. f/8 is the diffraction limit and usually go bout f/16 or so?
celciuz
post Jan 8 2014, 11:52 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Jan 8 2014, 12:04 AM)
On what body? It helps to remember to use the cross sensors. In terms of speed, not all AF-S motors are created equal. The ones on the 24mm f/1.4, 35mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.4 are one of the slowest.  sad.gif
*
Small motor to move big glass, can't compare against those telephoto with big motor to move big glass (well relative to the size la tongue.gif).
celciuz
post Jan 8 2014, 03:02 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Jan 8 2014, 02:13 PM)
Didn't have the 20mm f/2.8 before. I still have the AF-D 20-35mm f/2.8 zoom though. Obsolete and Nikon replaced it with AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8 and now the AF-S 16-35mm f/4 VR.

Anyway, nice lens and spend most of it's time on my D700 as my walkabout lens. Now on the D800, I use the 14-24mm f/2.8 and interchange it with the 24-70mm f/2.8.
Don't know if it's correct or not but I guess there are different grades / sizes of AF-S motors. I guess the 24mm f/1.4, 35mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.4 are using same motor?

I do know however that the AF-S motor in the 17-35mm f/2.8 and the AF-S 80-200mm f/2.8 are the same. I know the AF-S 80-200mm f/2.8 has blinding speed on AF but I guess the same also for the 17-35mm f/2.8? No chance to test that.
*
This one need to ask shinchan since he has the 17-35 f/2.8, me only using the tiny 16-35 f/4 LOL and its pretty slow compared to 70-200 VR2.

As far for the AF, 24-70 and 70200 have blazing speed minus the telephoto primes. The rest i've used are big aperture lens... and pretty slow.
celciuz
post Jan 10 2014, 09:39 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Side question, was cleaning my lens normally until butt itchy I went to shine it with LED torch... many micro dust -.- not able to clean them off T_T. Wipe this area clean, other area have. But then without the light I won't see them.

Question is how do you guys clean your lens? I used lenspen, it leaves black dust charcoal particles, use Zeiss swabs, also have dust left over ._.
celciuz
post Jan 10 2014, 11:58 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jan 10 2014, 10:33 AM)
blower blow away the dust? usually they dont stick after you wiped.
*
Yeap, the dust you can see with your eyes no problem. Issue is with those you can't see, but only appears when you shine light to the glass =/

QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Jan 10 2014, 11:02 AM)
Damn jelly your lens collection sifu haha  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
I've never really tried shining with torch, but I do noticed that a used (not 1st time) lenspen or microfibre cloths will sometimes add more dust/microparticles onto the lens as you clean laugh.gif

Have to use blower to blow them off...

But seriously sometimes I wonder how dust got into the inner lens even when a UV filter is used  sweat.gif
*
Hehe, thanks! Took me years to get those...

Maybe you can try and let me know? Shine with torch or LED. Oh yes, my lenspen does leave micro dust, black ones! Maybe I need to buy new lenspen... might be contaminated, or too old since I rarely use it. And yes my microfiber also quite old d, but rarely used. But then again, i could clean the surface, looks clean to my eyes and the dust can be blown off are the bigger white ones. But those not visible to me can't =/.

I tried to use tape to remove the dust, but then ended up with the tape's residual even worse sweat.gif

Went online shopping, saw this 2..

Zeiss,
http://shashinki.com/shop/zeiss-microfiber...hs-p-13865.html so expensive!

Matin,
http://shashinki.com/shop/matin-micro-fibe...50mm-p-189.html
and
http://shashinki.com/shop/matin-micro-pock...lue-p-6430.html

Anyone used one of these before?
celciuz
post Jan 10 2014, 05:10 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Jan 10 2014, 04:17 PM)
The 70-200mm f/4 VR is sharp, light and has better VR. The 70-200mm f/2.8 VR 1 vignettes wide open on full frame sensors. But then again, for what you're shooting, you're seldom shooting at f/2.8. So no worries there.

f/2.8 allows you to stack a 1.4x TC or 1.7x TC or even 2.0x TC if you dare for the added reach. The f/4 lens perhaps only allow 1.4x TC before it becomes too dark.

Anyway, if a slight increase in budget is allowed, the newly revised AF-S 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 ED VR is nice. Great optics and flexibility.

On a side note, you should have gotten a lens instead of getting a Nikon body. Nikon lenses have international warranty.
You're speaking about the external glass surface and not the lens internals? Because lens internals surely got these microdust when you shine your torch.

I believe the "problem" you're having is your lenspen and microfiber cloth not clean. That's the issue with using them. If you want them to be perfect, you need to wash your microfiber cloth or buy a new lenspen when it gets dirty. I get around this by using ordinary lens fluid cleaner and with a soft good quality normal tissue paper. With tissue paper, it's always new and you don't get this microdust issue when you clean your lenses. That's what I do lah.

Anyway, the microdust is a very small matter as it exist everywhere and does not affect anything.
*
That's why I bought those pre moistened Zeiss cleaner, but even those also gives tiny dusts under the torch shakehead.gif Oh well, I'll just live with it.
celciuz
post Jan 17 2014, 08:40 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Jan 17 2014, 03:09 PM)
Anyone here bought DF? I went to Batu Caves this morning to shoot Thaipusam and I must say the DF looks sexy in real life (albeit the stupid pricing and low specs tongue.gif)
*
Wanted to buy the Df until I saw the price, now looking at A7 instead LOL.
celciuz
post Jan 17 2014, 08:50 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Jan 17 2014, 08:49 PM)
it does looks good imo, but the looks definitely doesn't worth that much. it's like buying a myvi then put on GTR bodykit on it and sell at rm200k. didn't see any a7 today though tongue.gif tons of 1Ds/ D4 and leica.
*
Well, I just got back from a trip... and carrying the D800 along is seriously a pain in the ass. Am seriously considering something smaller and I still want FF so... =/ A7 sounds like the good choice. Or maybe I should just go for something like Fuji perhaps.
celciuz
post Jan 17 2014, 09:28 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Jan 17 2014, 09:23 PM)
but most mirrorless don't focus as well as DSLR and there's not many good tele lenses for them also. that's the only 2 points that holding me back from changing to fuji
*
You referring to speed or accuracy? Besides I don't bring my tele lens on travel anyways (70200? Nah...)
celciuz
post Jan 17 2014, 09:39 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Jan 17 2014, 09:32 PM)
speed for stills it's alright, but lets say you want to track something, then mirrorless can't do that well. oh you want to get it solely for travel? then of course you won't be needing a 70-200  tongue.gif
*
Yeah, buying a mirrorless for travel purpose. D800 + 16-35 is heavy... 35mm... 50mm... dang it LOL.

Too bad Nikon screwed up their mirrorless, else it would be a no brainer to get those instead. Sigh.
celciuz
post Jan 22 2014, 11:44 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Jan 21 2014, 11:42 PM)
No worries man, I feel the same way as you do nod.gif
Which is why there are two categories of street photographers - those who prefer short primes i.e. 35mm/50mm; and those who prefer sniper lenses i.e. 70-200 etc. laugh.gif
The former prefers blending into the environment; whereas the latter prefers the candid moment. There is no right or wrong actually, it all depends on your shooting style nod.gif

I find myself very shy when I try to shoot street shots in Malaysia, probably because I'm also afraid of being mugged apart from being scolded haha laugh.gif
But I had no problems shooting in Singapore an Hong Kong.. maybe the environment will affect the shooting too  laugh.gif
*
I'm also worried of being mugged, hence the jump to Fuji X hehehe laugh.gif there goes my budget for 2470.
celciuz
post Jan 22 2014, 11:52 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Jan 22 2014, 11:49 AM)
Same here, I believe I will be able to shoot more with a Fuji too since its smaller and less obvious~
The 24-70mm is a great lens, but definitely not suitable for street or candid shots since its so big and catches attention too easily laugh.gif Though I still took my street shots witht he 24-70 in Hong Kong- not that I have a choice haha  laugh.gif

Personally I think with your current lens setup, you won't really need the 24-70 anymore yo haha  laugh.gif
*
24-70 is on my wish list tongue.gif I can't wait to just use 24-70 for wedding instead of alternating between 35mm and 85mm sweat.gif

But I noticed myself shooting more on my iPhone than my D800 when traveling -.- which is why I'm going for something easier to handle and less obvious hehe.

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0443sec    0.40    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 04:49 AM