f5calvin 85mm too expensive for me.
asrul mind to share why u ask me opt for 35mm rather than 50mm?
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.23, National Geography edition
|
|
Dec 26 2013, 12:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
Thank guys, i almost forgot the crop factor is come with body, not the lens.
f5calvin 85mm too expensive for me. asrul mind to share why u ask me opt for 35mm rather than 50mm? |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2013, 01:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(jepertine90 @ Dec 26 2013, 12:35 PM) can I campur tangan here? Thanks for ur 'campur tangan'...ur advise is welcomed and appreciated. 35mm is more versatile as compared to 50mm, because I believe 50mm is = 75mm in DX which conisder a zoom lens already. while 35mm = 50mm-ish which still a standard wide. as for zoom lens, the frame you are capturing are much tighter, so if you want to take a full size car you might need to stand way back to frame it, while 35mm you can stand on a normal distance to take the shot. Because I'm more to like street photography/food/capalang photo, 35mm can capture more than the 50mm. Unless you are going portrait 50mm is perfect for it. I remember read it else where that 35mm is good for full size body, and 50mm is good for half size body.. just some of my humble opinion on 35mm vs 50mm. I think we should get both since 2 lens are very good and strategic priced. asrul yeah, tried before, 35mm is more suitable for me. I thought the reason u recommend 35mm over 50mm is something related to quality... Anyway, thanks u guys opinion, i adi changed my mind to 35mm instead. The reason i want to get the prime lens is the small size and light weight, and also i more interested on street photography & capalang photo like jepertine90. Will try hunt for it. Any non-Nikon prime lens to recommend? PS: Is it 'dangerous' to buy lens from garage sales? Via postage... This post has been edited by coolkwc: Dec 26 2013, 01:37 PM |
|
|
Dec 26 2013, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
Guys, here i want to share something regarding aperture size.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/great-high...performance.htm Please refer to 'math refresher' there. Seems like the aperture size = FL/xx is true like what i mentioned last time. Just i can't figure out why zoom lens is darker at the zoom end. Becos based on the calculation, aperture diameter of 18mm f/3.5 is smaller than 55mm f/5.6... This post has been edited by coolkwc: Dec 26 2013, 01:49 PM |
|
|
Dec 26 2013, 01:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 26 2013, 01:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 26 2013, 02:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2013, 02:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 26 2013, 02:02 PM) Those new Sigma is impressive, glad to see a third party like Sigma stepping up their game to put pressure on Nikon! For same FL, of course small f number is brighter.As far as I know, the light going through is measured by aperture size, in this case focal length / number. Don't really know how to explain but what I know is the longer the focal length, the bigger aperture as there will be light loss along the barrel before arriving at the sensor. 18/3.5 is brighter because its f/3.5. Take a prime for example, f/1.4 or f/8 brighter? And next is 35mm f/2.8 vs. 200mm f/2.8 is expected to be the same... but as usual they won't and the 200mm tend to be darker due to more light loss along the barrel. I think the bold part explained my doubt. |
|
|
Dec 26 2013, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
Wait guys...The 35mm f/1.8G lens don have manual aperture ring, means it is impossible to reverse lens if i want to play macro?
|
|
|
Dec 27 2013, 08:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 26 2013, 09:30 PM) IMO, camera replacement part/accessories most of them the pricing is unreasonable.Last Sunday i saw the Nikon remote pricing, ridiculous high, just a button for shutter, RM290. I just use my handphone to remote only... |
|
|
Dec 27 2013, 09:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 27 2013, 09:23 AM) DSLR is D3200...but Nikon shutter remote is universal, even u bought genuine remote is same for all Nikon DSLR.Phone wise, galaxy S4...this phone got IR transmitter, just download free apps from google play then tata... |
|
|
Dec 27 2013, 02:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
Maybe i read the price wrongly...
The remote is genuine Nikon part, saw from camera shop. Maybe just RM29.00, not 290... This post has been edited by coolkwc: Dec 27 2013, 02:13 PM |
|
|
Dec 27 2013, 04:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
Read alot of entry level DSLR recommendation threads today...
Curiously i wonder why ppl seldom recommend Nikon entry level DSLR if compare to Canon and Sony? I read alot of reviews, those in depth analysis, also shown output quality from Nikon is higher than other brands in the same class. The most commendable item for Nikon is hard to learn for newbie in fact they know the quality of Nikon is better. I dun know, before i own my D3200 less than 2 months ago, i have almost near to nil knowledge regarding the relation of exposure, shutter and aperture. But after less than 2 months, i already able to use manual mode now. Almost every night at home since i bought, i will take out my Nikon to play around even though i have nothing special to shoot (Yesterday i check my shutter count, reached 3359 just over 6 weeks), just shoot and compare the difference of each setting, read and understand the histogram, read online guide, read camera magazine (5th issue bought this week). IMO, Nikon menu setup is not as hard as they mentioned, each items has guide on that, just press a little '?' button will do. For me just same as driving a brand new manual car and learn all the characteristic from the feedback of the car. My opinion, if ones feel difficult to learn, is not becos it is difficult, just they dun have enough patient and passion for it. Then i would recommend taking compact cam rather than DSLR, cheap and easy to use. Just my thought. |
|
|
Dec 30 2013, 01:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
Tonite go hunt for Nikon 35mm f/1.8G prime lens...
Can't let my wife know about that. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2013, 02:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2013, 02:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2013, 02:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2013, 03:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2013, 04:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 08:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
Bought.
RM780...at the lower side of my expected range. |
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 09:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,112 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
Guys, if i want to remained same coverage for my 35mm prime same as 18mm, how much distance i need to move back? How to calculate? Any cheat sheet?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0240sec
0.40
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 08:19 AM |