Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Home Networking TP-Link WR1043ND V1 w/ OpenWRT, UniFi not working!

views
     
weirdguy
post Apr 6 2014, 10:05 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
587 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Miri, Sarawak


QUOTE(iOnicStorm @ Apr 6 2014, 09:40 PM)
Yeah, I think better not wasting time on that TM's 615 model. Even you can get it running OpenWRT, the main chip inside Ralink RT3052F (which many think its a low-end chip) tends to run hot (and so it's less stable, random restart...), with less than average performance (384 MHz MIPS 24Kc CPU)...  sweat.gif

I suggest buying MR3420 v2, which comes with an Atheros AR9341 SoC running on 535 MHz CPU (MIPS 74Kc). On lelong there's someone selling it with only RM6x.xx! (Usual price > RM80). The price-to-performance ratio is just unbeatable. So go grab one...  tongue.gif
*
Thanks you and the rest for your reply.
Very heartening to receive response this quick, though I had made several Inquiries at different Topics a few days ago.

I had checked your recommended MR3420. Indeed, good price.
However, I need VLAN Ready, at least Port-based. And according to OpenWRT Official Compatibility Table (http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start#tp-link), MR3420 does not have that feature.
weirdguy
post Apr 7 2014, 08:17 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
587 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Miri, Sarawak


Hello all again,

Do you think it is worth to spend RM150 to buy Asus WL-520GU.
The Router is OpenWRT/DD-WRT Ready.

I had googled and found that the Router has good rating though a bit dated, with only G-Wireless and no Gigabit LAN-Port.

Any comments?
iOnicStorm
post Apr 7 2014, 10:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(weirdguy @ Apr 6 2014, 10:05 PM)
I had checked your recommended MR3420. Indeed, good price.
However, I need VLAN Ready, at least Port-based. And according to OpenWRT Official Compatibility Table (http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start#tp-link), MR3420 does not have that feature.
*
I'm using MR3420 v2 now and it does have VLAN support, after flashing OpenWRT. Sometimes, infomation on OpenWRT wiki may be a bit outdated...

Attached Image

MR3420 v2 isn't yet officially supported by the latest stable OpenWRT i.e. Attitude Adjustment 12.09 final. It's only supported in trunk snapshot (i.e. Barrier Breaker). Previously I tested that version and the USB didn't work, But recently I tried again and it works. Though, I'm using another firmware compiled by a OpenWRT developer from Czech Republic, not coming from the official OpenWRT site.

iOnicStorm
post Apr 7 2014, 10:39 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(weirdguy @ Apr 7 2014, 08:17 PM)
Hello all again,

Do you think it is worth to spend RM150 to buy Asus WL-520GU.
The Router is OpenWRT/DD-WRT Ready.

I had googled and found that the Router has good rating though a bit dated, with only G-Wireless and no Gigabit LAN-Port.

Any comments?
*
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/asus/wl520gu

That model is seriously outdated: Broadcom chip with 240MHz CPU, 16 MiB SDRAM, 4MiB Flash memory. RM150 second hand? I'll rather buy WR1043ND new! smile.gif

Comparing to MR3420 v2: 535 MHz CPU with 32 MiB DDR RAM and 4MiB flash memory, Wireless N 300 Mbps MIMO (2T2R); RM 70+ new... You do the math... rolleyes.gif

weirdguy
post Apr 7 2014, 11:02 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
587 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Miri, Sarawak


Thanks you very much, iOnicStorm

I will go ahead with your suggestion, MR3420.

Thanks you again,
MaL
post May 28 2014, 01:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
130 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
hi all...need help here..after config my router following klseet instruction...but it doesnt connect to unifi...
the only difference between my config and his is the network-->switch tab...mine showing port 0-4 then cpu..
his showing 1-5 then cpu...so i assume my port 0=to his port 5=to physical wan port?
hope someone can help me here..

my router: TP-Link TL-WR1043ND ver 1.6
firmware version: OpenWrt Attitude Adjustment 12.09 / LuCI 0.11.1 Release (0.11.1)

QUOTE
config interface 'loopback'
option ifname 'lo'
option proto 'static'
option ipaddr '127.0.0.1'
option netmask '255.0.0.0'

config interface 'lan'
option ifname 'eth0.1'
option type 'bridge'
option proto 'static'
option ipaddr '192.168.1.1'
option netmask '255.255.255.0'

config interface 'wan'
option _orig_ifname 'eth0.2'
option _orig_bridge 'false'
option proto 'pppoe'
option username 'username'
option password 'password'
option peerdns '0'
option dns '8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4'
option ifname 'eth0.500'

config switch
option name 'rtl8366rb'
option reset '1'
option enable_vlan '1'
option enable_vlan4k '1'

config switch_vlan
option device 'rtl8366rb'
option vlan '1'
option ports '2 3 4 5t'

config switch_vlan
option device 'rtl8366rb'
option ports '1t 5t'
option vlan '500'

config switch_vlan
option device 'rtl8366rb'
option ports '0 1t 5t'
option vlan '600'

config interface 'IPTV'
option type 'bridge'
option proto 'none'
option ifname 'eth0.600'
anything wrong with above config?..thanks in advanced..
WhitE LighteR
post May 28 2014, 06:17 PM

WhitE LighteR Is Black~
********
All Stars
10,340 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(MaL @ May 28 2014, 01:08 AM)
hi all...need help here..after config my router following klseet instruction...but it doesnt connect to unifi...
the only difference between my config and his is the network-->switch tab...mine  showing port 0-4 then cpu..
his showing 1-5 then cpu...so i assume my port 0=to his port 5=to physical wan port?
hope someone can help me here..

my router: TP-Link TL-WR1043ND ver 1.6
firmware version: OpenWrt Attitude Adjustment 12.09 / LuCI 0.11.1 Release (0.11.1)
anything wrong with above config?..thanks in advanced..
*
you can map the port yourself by plugging a LAN cable into the port and see which one registers on the GUI. Then from there you can roughly guess which port is the WAN port.

Its call process of elimination. Try it....
MaL
post May 28 2014, 06:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
130 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(WhitE LighteR @ May 28 2014, 06:17 PM)
you can map the port yourself by plugging a LAN cable into the port and see which one registers on the GUI. Then from there you can roughly guess which port is the WAN port.

Its call process of elimination. Try it....
*
yes, i did that and it is port 0..but i still cant get it connect to unifi..
wifi and all other ports works ok...
cant try iptv though since im not even connected to unifi...
WhitE LighteR
post May 28 2014, 06:51 PM

WhitE LighteR Is Black~
********
All Stars
10,340 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(MaL @ May 28 2014, 06:37 PM)
yes, i did that and it is port 0..but i still cant get it connect to unifi..
wifi and all other ports works ok...
cant try iptv though since im not even connected to unifi...
*
Your problem is that you did not add the SWITCH into the NETWORK.

In Network you need to go and edit LAN and add the vlan500 that you have created into it.

CODE
config interface 'lan'
option ifname 'eth0.1'
option type 'bridge'
option proto 'static'
option ipaddr '192.168.1.1'
option netmask '255.255.255.0'


If you go klseet website he did this for the IPTV. You can follow the same way but add the vlan500 instead of 600

This post has been edited by WhitE LighteR: May 28 2014, 06:52 PM
speck123
post May 28 2014, 07:33 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(MaL @ May 28 2014, 01:08 AM)
hi all...need help here..after config my router following klseet instruction...but it doesnt connect to unifi...
the only difference between my config and his is the network-->switch tab...mine  showing port 0-4 then cpu..
his showing 1-5 then cpu...so i assume my port 0=to his port 5=to physical wan port?
hope someone can help me here..

my router: TP-Link TL-WR1043ND ver 1.6
firmware version: OpenWrt Attitude Adjustment 12.09 / LuCI 0.11.1 Release (0.11.1)
anything wrong with above config?..thanks in advanced..
*
This is a switch setting I had when I was still running OpenWRT last year. It looks like your port tagging is wrong. IIRC WAN port (port 0) and the CPU (port 5) are always tagged.

CODE
config switch
option name 'rtl8366rb'
option reset '1'
option enable_vlan '1'
option enable_vlan4k '1'

config switch_vlan
option device 'rtl8366rb'
option vlan '1'
option ports '1 2 3 5t'

config switch_vlan
option device 'rtl8366rb'
option ports '0t 5t'
option vlan '500'

config switch_vlan
option device 'rtl8366rb'
option ports '0t 4 5t'
option vlan '600'

config interface 'IPTV'
option proto 'none'
option ifname 'eth0.600'
option auto '1'
option type 'bridge'


WhitE LighteR
post May 28 2014, 08:18 PM

WhitE LighteR Is Black~
********
All Stars
10,340 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(speck123 @ May 28 2014, 07:33 PM)
This is a switch setting I had when I was still running OpenWRT last year. It looks like your port tagging is wrong. IIRC WAN port (port 0) and the CPU (port 5) are always tagged.

CODE
config switch
option name 'rtl8366rb'
option reset '1'
option enable_vlan '1'
option enable_vlan4k '1'

config switch_vlan
option device 'rtl8366rb'
option vlan '1'
option ports '1 2 3 5t'

config switch_vlan
option device 'rtl8366rb'
option ports '0t 5t'
option vlan '500'

config switch_vlan
option device 'rtl8366rb'
option ports '0t 4 5t'
option vlan '600'

config interface 'IPTV'
option proto 'none'
option ifname 'eth0.600'
option auto '1'
option type 'bridge'

*
oh ya.. the wan port has to be tagged with 500 n 600.. good eye thumbup.gif
MaL
post May 28 2014, 10:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
130 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(WhitE LighteR @ May 28 2014, 06:51 PM)
Your problem is that you did not add the SWITCH into the NETWORK.

In Network you need to go and edit LAN and add the vlan500 that you have created into it.

CODE
config interface 'lan'
option ifname 'eth0.1'
option type 'bridge'
option proto 'static'
option ipaddr '192.168.1.1'
option netmask '255.255.255.0'


If you go klseet website he did this for the IPTV. You can follow the same way but add the vlan500 instead of 600
*
QUOTE(WhitE LighteR @ May 28 2014, 08:18 PM)
oh ya.. the wan port has to be tagged with 500 n 600.. good eye thumbup.gif
*
hey..thanks guys...tagging port 0 (wan) with 500 works...
seems like the screenshot on klseet has got mistake?
or is there something i misread or missed?
that's why kept me thinking whole night last night how this systems work so what i think is correct but didnt have the time to try and was dead tired from work...

i follow the steps from this link:
http://klseet.com/index.php/tl-wr1043nd-ve...unifi-10031-rc6

u can see that he is tagging port 1 with 500 and 600...or is it because his port 1 is the wan port?
and he written there IPTV will use physical LANport 4 but the port 4 is off?

This post has been edited by MaL: May 28 2014, 10:54 PM
speck123
post May 29 2014, 04:09 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(MaL @ May 28 2014, 10:42 PM)
hey..thanks guys...tagging port 0 (wan) with 500 works...
seems like the screenshot on klseet has got mistake?
or is there something i misread or missed?
that's why kept me thinking whole night last night how this systems work so what i think is correct but didnt have the time to try and was dead tired from work...

i follow the steps from this link:
http://klseet.com/index.php/tl-wr1043nd-ve...unifi-10031-rc6

u can see that he is tagging port 1 with 500 and 600...or is it because his port 1 is the wan port?
and he written there  IPTV will use physical LANport 4 but the port 4 is off?
*
His port 1 is the WAN port. If you look, you'll also see than LAN port 4 is marked port 5 in the image, and that the CPU is labelled as CPU. In the current config, it's just port 0 (WAN), port 1 to 4 (LAN1 to LAN4) and port 5 (CPU). He is not wrong per se, just that the pic is outdated.
MaL
post May 29 2014, 10:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
130 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(speck123 @ May 29 2014, 04:09 AM)
His port 1 is the WAN port. If you look, you'll also see than LAN port 4 is marked port 5 in the image, and that the CPU is labelled as CPU. In the current config, it's just port 0 (WAN), port 1 to 4 (LAN1 to LAN4) and port 5 (CPU). He is not wrong per se, just that the pic is outdated.
*
ok thanks!..at least got it to work...just that not sure which wifi transmission power will give the best result...currently set at 24dBm...
sHawTY
post Aug 18 2014, 06:48 PM

Frequent Reporter
********
All Stars
14,909 posts

Joined: Jul 2005

Barrier Breaker RC3 is released for TP-Link TL-WR1043ND V1.

Factory Flash:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_break...hfs-factory.bin

System Upgrade:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_break...-sysupgrade.bin

RC4 or Final should be released within 2 weeks. smile.gif
sHawTY
post Sep 29 2014, 08:18 PM

Frequent Reporter
********
All Stars
14,909 posts

Joined: Jul 2005

Barrier Breaker 14.07 Final has been released.

TP-Link TL-WR1043ND v1 Factory:
https://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_break...hfs-factory.bin

TP-Link TL-WR1043ND v1 System Upgrade:
https://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_break...-sysupgrade.bin

Only tested this firmware for 10 minutes, because I no longer use this router.
Upgraded to AC68U since a few months ago, so the screenshot below is just me testing the new firmware.

user posted image

This post has been edited by sHawTY: Oct 1 2014, 09:16 PM
mastermindsos
post Oct 1 2014, 09:23 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
373 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Thank you for the update. I will try this new firmware.
I am having serious issue with wifi dropping on my 1043nd v1.8, to the length of planning to get a different router.

I bricked this router so many times, that luckily able to get it repaired/replaced for the first 3 times.

Now, i repaired it myself when it bricked smile.gif

Edit: I couldn't find the release note for the BB stable release. Is this made official yet?

This post has been edited by mastermindsos: Oct 1 2014, 10:36 AM
sHawTY
post Oct 1 2014, 11:16 AM

Frequent Reporter
********
All Stars
14,909 posts

Joined: Jul 2005

QUOTE(mastermindsos @ Oct 1 2014, 09:23 AM)
Edit: I couldn't find the release note for the BB stable release. Is this made official yet?
Nope, but it's no longer has (RC) wording on it, so I assume it's stable.
It's the same thing as Attitude Adjustment, they took quite some time to publish it on their "news" page.

I noticed with Barrier Breaker, the internet seems quite lagging if IPV6 is not connected, but since IPV6 is not implemented yet in my area, I just delete it from the Interface page. After deleting it, internet works fine.

But then again, I've only tested the firmware for a few minutes.
djhenry91
post Oct 1 2014, 07:54 PM

Slow and Steady
*******
Senior Member
6,779 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: SEGI Heaven


i using OpenWrt Backfire 10.03.1 / LuCI 0.10.0 Release (0.10.0)

for factory and upgrade, which i should dl?
sHawTY
post Oct 1 2014, 09:14 PM

Frequent Reporter
********
All Stars
14,909 posts

Joined: Jul 2005

QUOTE(djhenry91 @ Oct 1 2014, 07:54 PM)
i using OpenWrt Backfire 10.03.1 / LuCI 0.10.0 Release (0.10.0)

for factory and upgrade, which i should dl?
Since you're already on OpenWrt, just use the "sysupgrade" firmware.
Remember to reset the settings to default before flashing.

This post has been edited by sHawTY: Oct 1 2014, 09:14 PM

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0309sec    0.61    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 12:55 AM