africano     .... not americano ah?

Initially we were supposed to have direct access from LDP. It was in the approved master plan. However, the RAs from the taman behind make noise. I think SPS has done a great job agreeing to construct the elevated U-turn. MPSJ should be fair to the developer too. The U-turn has been constructed, if it has been checked safe for use, just give the damn approval and let us use it! Many people are using the pedestrian bridge especially those waiting for buses, it is not solely for SW residents' use. MPSJ should take over the maintenance. Not fair to choke it down SW's throat.

so is Setiawalk going to have a new bridge connecting to the LRT? I only see there is few beams at the old bridge.
And why the direct flyover into setiawalk in block after open

so that means there is no bridge directly connecting Setiawalk to the LRT? 

Why is the ramp to SetiaWalk closed?

Three reasons were offered.
1. It blocked the view from block B.
2. It hindered human walking traffic.
3. It looked ugly.

Go on site to examine the leftover mark on the floor and you will see reason 1 & 2 is not fully valid. The Jmc member who suggested reason 3 withdrew her vote for dismantling the sculpture.
Not sure whether those who wanted to tear down the sculpture have anything to do with the way Management (as managed by PMC Property Services) even ignoring the official written view of COB to bring the issue to an AGM for a decision.

Removing an asset that that is part of overall assets that help to set SW apart from the rest of commercial centres in the market, is a step backward.

A last term JMC member proposed the number of Jmc members be reduced to 10 during last agm although there were 12 valid volunteers. And the result of the vote shows SPS rep endosed this proposal. So a lower quorum is now needed to pass proposals. Is this good for the management of SW?

SP Setia indirectly owns SW Mall. This entittles it to about 15pct of total share units. Usually all the owners that turn up in an agm were much less than 15pct of total share units. This means no point voting. SPS one vote would overhelm all the other votes summed up whatever the issue. Last year SPS clearly voted to reduce the number of volunteered jmc members. Less people less noise. SPS is in full control of SW JMB. About RM25k per month is paid to 3 mgt staffs for marketing/promo. So why still such poor performance? Why is mgt not delivering what it promised in bnw?  Why is JMB not doing anything to correct this course? SP Setia must hold major responsibility if Setia Walk contine to go downhill. A SPS rep in JMB who just show face for half of meetings time is just not good enough. SW need a more responsible and dedicated one.The success or failure of SW is partly in SP Setia's hand - to go in the right direction or otherwise. Conflict of interest is never good.