Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Samsung Galaxy Note III - Official V1, 3rd Gen of the original Phablet !!

views
     
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 01:15 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(owentan328 @ Sep 10 2013, 01:13 PM)
whats the point of having 3 GB of RAM when samsung cant even get the smoothness of its UI right .

fail
*
How you know the UI not smooth? Maybe production Note 3 will be smooth? laugh.gif
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 01:17 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(oldKyoo @ Sep 10 2013, 01:14 PM)
Yes it is using android, but it requires much more than just slapping a powerful soc onto a flagship device, something neither HTC or Samsung has done.

That said, I do agree with you that that lag can be done away with a sheer amount of dedication, it just requires much more effort and we all know effort = higher costs.
*
Well, we have the hardware = 8 core
Now we just need the support from OS = Google rclxms.gif (I'm sure they have headcount to do this better) drool.gif
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 01:26 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(joytest @ Sep 10 2013, 01:24 PM)
Since you give a specific example I will give you a specific answer.

S3 and note2 have the same tw version. There is some occasional lag on s3 but nothing major. Note 2 has no lag.

S4 has reported lags but you're not going to die from it right? Note3 is expected to do away with those issues.
*
erm maybe S4 Exynos lag is due to switching of thread from ARM7 to ARM15.

By enabling all cores, lag will be gone? rclxms.gif
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 01:27 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(owentan328 @ Sep 10 2013, 01:24 PM)
yeah thats true.

i personally think that nowadays deciding on buying an android device with respect to pure hardware performance is just too main stream.

its not just the performance ,  UI plays an important role .

without smooth UI..  whatever highest end performance put into the phone.  the results is still going to be sucks
*
Well you got customed ROM. Just get the PURE AOSP one. laugh.gif
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 01:30 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(owentan328 @ Sep 10 2013, 01:30 PM)
yeah thats true..

what i meant was if you want to buy an android device. you would choose a smooth UI/phone or a bit laggy UI/phone out of the box?
*
I will choose hardware with more ROM so that any problem also can be fixed thumbup.gif
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 01:35 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(joytest @ Sep 10 2013, 01:33 PM)
To me, screw the stock ui. I look at specs. I don't know how to use TW as it only lasts 5 mins after a reset or even when I get a new device. I have 5 androids and they are all running Nova. I do not remember how each different devices' stock ui looks like or behaves.
*
Actually it TW UI look the same like stock. laugh.gif Only Sense is huge departure from stock UI. That's my take la.
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 01:48 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Sep 10 2013, 01:43 PM)
Exactly! That why I said start from S III, Galaxy series is experiment product from Samsung.

S III lagging due to 1GB RAM is not enough for that time Touchwiz. Then Note II solve it by changing to 2GB.

Now S4 lagging or not stable possible due to 2GB RAM no longer enough for current more features and heavy Touchwiz. And then Note 3 is given user 3GB RAM which high possible eliminates the issues.
*
haiyo, later people say only Samsung need more RAM due to TW icon_question.gif
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 01:49 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(xproc @ Sep 10 2013, 01:48 PM)
note 4 = 4GB ram...
*
sound logical. Anyway, default laptop RAM has been stagnanted at 4GB. I think 4GB will be magical number.
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 01:54 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(sai86 @ Sep 10 2013, 01:52 PM)
agree on this. nth much different for me between stock android and TW UI. but on Sense, i'm quite confused on it when i play with my fren HTC One. about non-smoothness/laggy, i muz say i never came across this on my Note 2, or juz my eyes aint superman enough to detect.

In the end, its a rectangular with curve corner device to communicate with other ppl...... yawn.gif
*
haha, that's why when people say they hate TW, I dun get it. It look the same to me. sweat.gif

Anyway, lag means when you touch the phone, it does not response like rocket. Quite easy to detect. No need good eye.
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 02:14 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Sep 10 2013, 02:10 PM)
More RAM actually affected the overall smoothness.

S III lagging main issue due to it not enough RAM, and keep closing background task to let the phone still work in proper, and badly it can even close the main thing - touchwiz launcher.

When RAM is too little to handle everything, how you tweak also useless. Those custom ROM can run more proper as basically most is trim down the whole ROM thus less things run in background, this in-fact is not the real solution. If buy a phone, I want it fully utilize whatever given by the manufacturer, not a trim down edition.

Thus, adding more RAM in-fact is the better way.
*
I agree with you. If not enough RAM, process with keep on switch in and out from RAM and it'll affect overall smoothness of the device.

But isn't UI already in the memory?

The reason we have lagness is it because of Android prioritization problem? Android just need to finish doing certain task before react to touch or change task. That contribute to lag.

Probably Sir Lord Baron trying to say that for UI, its already preloaded inside RAM. So it should not be affected by being switch in and out from RAM. It's protected under OS portion of the RAM. So increasing RAM no effect to UI.

This post has been edited by gogo2: Sep 10 2013, 02:15 PM
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 02:21 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(un_id @ Sep 10 2013, 02:15 PM)
it comes to a question, do we really need 3gb RAM? is it just a waste of resources? for user, having more is always good.. but for manufacturer, being smart, being conservative while it still can.. how if next flagship come with 5gb RAM, do we need that much? for me, 1gb RAM boooo.. but 3gb, i don't mind, because 2gb is still abundant…So far i never been in a situation that my 2gb RAM is fully utilized, so why 3gb? just for the sake of fancy spec sheet? its like a Proton Wira with big spoiler, does it really need that? tongue.gif  laugh.gif but anyway i'm dunno engineering stuffs, maybe the current/incoming Android needed 3gb RAM. or maybe TW is so heavy that it needed 3gb RAM while other UI running fine on 2gb..
*
3gb for future use. Maybe got ram hog game next. Or make can install Ubuntu. Endless Possibilities. rclxms.gif

QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Sep 10 2013, 02:19 PM)
Actually example for myself, I know the smoothness always is Nexus series phone due to it pure Android.

But I never like Nexus, why? Simple, pure android features is really pure, quite empty actually as destEX said, Nexus phone never fulfill my needs.

I prefer more features phone.
*
Wah, Note 3 is loaded with feature to the brim. You should get it first day drool.gif
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 02:23 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Baronic @ Sep 10 2013, 02:21 PM)
the bolded part is not quite true. ANd there is more that goes into a good custom rom (keyword good) than just shaving things off. There is actual optimisations being done. the simplest one i can think of is partitioning more ram for the UI usage.

the program again, is not enough ram. Lets take Note 2 for example. 2GB.

Out of 2GBram, how much ram is being used by TW UI? not 2GB. a fraction of that. So how is increasing the pool of available ram to 3GB gonna change anything? Its got to go down to the TW UI framework itself. You dont need the extra 1GB to become 3GB to increase smoothness. WHat you need to do is allocate more of the 2GB pool into the TW UI for example, but even then, by right, u shouldnt need to do that because to do it means that the UI has memory leak in the first place. :/

when your S3 lags, the TW UI, go to your ram, and see where is the pool of ram being assigned to. Then you can get a better picture of why your device is lagging.

so yea. Optimisation is the keyword

the rest of your post is more or less spot on
*
Maybe its just boiled down to Android OS. It just refuse to execute TW UI when doing other things. Thus, more cores are need and Kitkat need to take advantage is 8 MP.
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 02:24 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(joytest @ Sep 10 2013, 02:23 PM)
We are holding computers, not phones anymore.  More RAM is ALWAYS a good thing to reduce paging. Why are in memory accelerators all the rage in enterprise database and application software??

More RAM lets you do more. Do not ever think you are using a phone to browse. It is a computer that uses your phone radio as a modem only.
*
True. Some website is ram hog is use Desktop UA.
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 02:27 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(xproc @ Sep 10 2013, 02:25 PM)
is it just me or other will think of this... since ram is designed long time ago because processor read at ram faster than read at spinning harddisk (pc era)....

since nowadays all mobile phones all using flashed based chip storage, why they dont skip all over the ram thing, directly read at the storage chips, does it makes sense?

Instead of
processor (SoC, 1.7gHz) <> ram (2gb) <> storage (8/16/32gb)

how about
processor (SoC, 1.3 gHz) <> flashed based ram/storage (8/16/32gb)

then no more lag things happens lor... samsung is hardware maker, i root on then to do this, or maybe qualcomm or apple or intel or nvidia or amd can do this also...
*
RAM run at multiple of bus speed. Flash chip still slower than RAM. Also, I believe that this will prolong the life of flash chip.

This post has been edited by gogo2: Sep 10 2013, 02:28 PM
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 02:43 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(joytest @ Sep 10 2013, 02:35 PM)
Omg this thread will bust 2500 in the next few hours... I will only be home around 11pm.

Hang in there guys and gals.
*
calling @Andrewtst

Just kidding. rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by gogo2: Sep 10 2013, 02:43 PM
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 03:06 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(destEX @ Sep 10 2013, 03:05 PM)
no, everyone knows iphone doesn't lag, it is a godlike phone, it doesn't crash too.
*
It lag but not the way Android lag.
SUSgogo2
post Sep 10 2013, 03:11 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(billy_overheat @ Sep 10 2013, 03:09 PM)
So many people complained about the lagginess of this and that, yet, I bet those who said something like this are still using crappy laptop/desktop at home without even tweaking it.

*Iphone fans*
*
TO be frank, Windows 8 no lag even with low end spec laugh.gif

5 Pages « < 3 4 5Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0445sec    0.46    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 05:39 PM