QUOTE(RazorVista @ Sep 2 2013, 09:44 PM)
Arsenal is not a feeder club too, bro. Btw, I never heard any manager of the club will announce how many transfer fund they have. When all the fans scream for AW to spend, it does mean they all do know how much money Arsenal has and we all know. From the sale of Hleb, Nasri, Pires, Silva, Henry, Vieira, Van Persie and Fabregas.
Anyway, you know Arsenal no longer have debt while Man Utd has £307m + refinanced £178m of outstanding debt. How can you say both have equal transfer fund? Not even make sense right?
United's debts are nothing to do with transfer funds. I have no say on how the Glazers are paying their debts but as far as I know, they are not affecting our funds at all. That is why I said, your statement on Arsenal having 120mil is irrelevant. Because there is no truth in it. Have you not forgotten that Wenger did splashed money on players like Poldi, Chamakh, Carzola and Giroud? They didnt come cheap yeah. Anyway, you know Arsenal no longer have debt while Man Utd has £307m + refinanced £178m of outstanding debt. How can you say both have equal transfer fund? Not even make sense right?
And I never said equal. I said almost similar. Don't slender me. If United don't have the funds, why would they attempt to sign 3 players over the transfer window? Fellaini cost 25mil, Baines, another 15mil = 40 mil. What about Herrera? Another 30 mi. Even though they have yet to sign anyone, don't the value sums up to 70mil should they sign all 3? Even if they do not sign anyone, the funds are still there. Part of Ronaldo's sale is still intact, alongside the annual transfer kitty that Glazers provide. We sold Ronaldo for 80mil, let's not forget that.
Sep 2 2013, 09:58 PM

Quote
0.0181sec
0.55
6 queries
GZIP Disabled