Loan.

Lingard is a good prospect. But should be good experience for him.

All we need now is for RVP and the lads to keep calm. One mistake and they are off. Come on lads!

This is when 'plastic' fans like these appears.

Lazy lah. These plastic fans needs their moment of 'fame' too. So we'll just let them have it

Indirectly giving you that troll face.

Alahai, I thought can read TL:DR post in the morning, only 2 lines ke bro? Ayam dissapoint

Too long, dunwan/dont read.

ahaha. I'll let sino do the honors first, for the time being, I'll be the observer

This post has been edited by andrewtho: Sep 2 2013, 11:26 AM

14 hours to go. Ticktockticktock

United don't have that? It seems that we have almost the same about of funds as Arsenal do. The only problem is that we don't tend to 'overspend' too much on one player. 45mil for Ozil is alot...

120mil? What did you hear that from? Rumors? Be realistic please. If they have 120mil, why are they signing players on free? Logically speaking, those 'funds' you claimed, are rumors created by medias. No one knows how much both clubs have because none of them publicly discussed their available funds to the pressmen.

Correct. They have sold a lot players but lets not forget about the debt they owed for the stadium yeah. They have only recently paid finish their debt. So basically only recently they have break-even their cheque books. Again 120mil is illogical. United are not a feeder club, we don't sell players every season unless they personally request a transfer or are deemed as 'deadwood'. We don't need to sell players to balance our books, our revenues comes from various sources including sponsorships, ticket sale, mech and jersey sales.

Again, your claim of 120mil does not come from a creditable source. So it is just a rumor. Nothing else. Get me a source that Wenger says directly: 'We have 120mil to spend', then i'll believe you.

Sami Khedira? He plays CDM leh.

United's debts are nothing to do with transfer funds. I have no say on how the Glazers are paying their debts but as far as I know, they are not affecting our funds at all. That is why I said, your statement on Arsenal having 120mil is irrelevant. Because there is no truth in it. Have you not forgotten that Wenger did splashed money on players like Poldi, Chamakh, Carzola and Giroud? They didnt come cheap yeah.

And I never said equal. I said almost similar. Don't slender me. If United don't have the funds, why would they attempt to sign 3 players over the transfer window? Fellaini cost 25mil, Baines, another 15mil = 40 mil. What about Herrera? Another 30 mi. Even though they have yet to sign anyone, don't the value sums up to 70mil should they sign all 3? Even if they do not sign anyone, the funds are still there. Part of Ronaldo's sale is still intact, alongside the annual transfer kitty that Glazers provide. We sold Ronaldo for 80mil, let's not forget that.

Yup, you are a true United fan that calls your club 'MANU'.

United's annual transfer kitty is 30mil. The unused funds were carried forward to the next transfer window. As SAF always say, the funds from Ronaldo's sale are not 100% used up.

Its okay la bro. He's a deluded chap. He belittles others thinking that his knowledge is way more superior than others, true fact is that he's blurting out rubbish. Even calls United as 'MANU'. rofl. Only a real United fan will understand the meaning of it. Let him be, deluded as always. Time to 'back-track'

sinooffire chill brah. We know you are high right nao

Eh hello. Stop being so ignorant can? Annual transfer earnings on top of TV revenues, sponsorships and those trophies that we've won after Ronaldo left? Lets not forget, we won the UCL in 2008, and the money generated from UCL is alot? So yeah.

I was about to say that. So called 'fan'

United ready to match Herrera's £30.5m buy-out clause as Moyes closes in on first deadline day signing

HAHAHA. Used to calling you sino until termasuk additional 'o'

Window shutting around 6am our time. No sleep tonight then, thanks to kayu's last minute rush