QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Oct 15 2014, 04:54 PM)
wonder when it'll get integrated to magician software lolThe SSD Thread V4, Solid State Drive
The SSD Thread V4, Solid State Drive
|
|
Oct 20 2014, 06:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Oct 15 2014, 04:54 PM) wonder when it'll get integrated to magician software lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2014, 06:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Oct 19 2014, 04:21 PM) Boring Sunday... I did a Benchy run on a recently upgraded 850 Pro 512GB with Rapid mode enabled:- that is some crazy performance there...» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i'll probably be contacting you soon for my own 850PRO at the moment contemplating if i want to wait for m.2 version or SATA Express as my planned X99 mobo will be supporting it. |
|
|
Oct 20 2014, 10:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Oct 20 2014, 09:56 PM) normally sata ssd's are much cheaper because they are fairly common now. newer technologies like m.2 are relatively expensive (pci-e x4 ssd is about 2 times the price of sata ones), however it's still the best option for speed in a year or two, before we have the chance to use nvme ssd. (looking at the trend of many laptops released this year have already implemented pci-e x4 m.2 slots) yeah you're right... new tech always bear a premium price tag since the beginning of time.sata express. well, hopefully it will survive. i've had my share of experiences when it comes to cutting/bleeding edge tech and i'm not too sure if i want to tread that path yet again just to gain "marginal" ( humanly perceptible by daily usage anyways) improvements for few times the price. even without SATA express/M.2 implementations the 850 pro has already shown astounding performance via clever usage of Samsung RAPID to bypass current SATA bottleneck. then again, what about M.2/SATA Express AND RAPID? and yes you are right, i don't see SATA Express lasting considering M.2 can do the same thing, if not better with smaller form factor/footprint, with direct interfacing instead of going through a cable/controller and a bridging with PCI-E just to overcome the SATA bottleneck in the interim because SATA 4 isn't coming anytime soon. heck, the way PCI-E is going, SATA may even potentially cease advancement and god knows if it'll even die out like P-ATA of the old days. |
|
|
Oct 21 2014, 01:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Oct 21 2014, 01:23 AM) haha.. still, new techs are always the main motivations to many of us to move forward ya good pointers.to many, there is really no need to go for latest techs. for general use, sata ssd is more than sufficient imo (even without ram cache). they can just enjoy cheaper technologies, without the need to wait for new techs. they just start getting these much faster ssd's when their price are much affordable. (and to be frank, they miss nothing in the process). i have tested m.2 ssd with ram cache. that's why i think up to certain points of speed, we cannot see the differences already (except for benchmarking). sata is apparently not for ssd, but it is still a mature technology for hdd. since hdd is the cheapest storage device available, i believe sata will not phase out that soon. (compared to rapidly evolving ssd techs) and maturity in technology is important when it comes to reliability and cost. |
|
|
Oct 21 2014, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
from LYN google ads:
http://ocz.com/higher-pc-performance looks like OCZ (under Toshiba acquisition) will be focusing on SSD solely. their PSU/PC P&C division went here: http://www.firepower-technology.com/ RAMs no idea lol (update: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCZ_Storage_Solutions pretty much explains it lol) what else was under OCZ? (yes i'm still using their RAMs lol) |
|
|
Oct 21 2014, 02:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Oct 21 2014, 02:21 PM) yes. there are still a lot of rooms for improvement in technologies surrounding ssd. some were already discovered but yet to be implemented. then, after speed we still want much better endurance and reliability, all at the affordable price. it's a long way to go before ssd gets really matured. aye... sounds like the Samsung 850pro is the way to go for me... a bit steep on the pricing... but 10 years warranty is crazy as hell it's better to grab what we can now and have fun first, rather than waiting for the next best thing. (.. for like forever) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 22 2014, 07:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(wKkaY @ Oct 21 2014, 10:34 PM) I'm in the market looking for an SSD to replace my 160GB Intel. I have the 840 EVO 250gb. Price vs performance (and gb) especially with rapid mode is among the best in the market. I was thinking of getting a ~500GB SSD, but the 1TB Samsung 840 Evo caught my eye. It has much better $/GB than other SSDs. Any catch behind it? The slowness bug (pertaining to old files) is very real however Samsung released new firmware and fix tool for you to run it once a while (a month?) to get it resolved. Additionally prior to that fix there's always ssd based Defrag software and Samsung magician performance optimize /restoration tool to overcome /workaround that issue. It's a hassle no doubt however for what you're getting /paying for, I guess I can live with it. |
|
|
Oct 22 2014, 07:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Oct 15 2014, 06:30 PM) wow i totally forgot about this. thanks man Oh ya how long did it took you to run that tool?edit: the restore process took some time. it's best to run the process without anything else running, or it will run very slowly. at first glance, everything is back to normal. both are working at good speed for now. let's see if something get slowed down after some times. 840 EVO sata: [attachmentid=4172362] 840 EVO msata: [attachmentid=4172361] |
|
|
Oct 23 2014, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Oct 22 2014, 09:53 PM) no you only need to run the tool once bro thanks for clarifying, it seems like the new firmware will have this new "refreshing" or better algorithm on dealing with old files, hence the tool only runs it for previously already old files and only required to run once.those defragment tools are hdd defragmentation tool, not ssd-based. yeah it writes a lot to your ssd. the idea was to rewrite everything so that samsung 840 evo is aware of the changes and treat old files as new. samsung magician does nothing to fix the bug unfortunately. er.. i think it's about 20 minutes for each? my drives are quite empty. It isn't integrated to current magician or offered as separate firmware download probably due to that reason. atm i'm using mydefrag which have a flash memory/SSD based pre-set script, working fine so far. any experience on that? or what other software do you prefer when dealing with SSDs? (preferably free lol!) magician does help for me since vista doesn't have native TRIM afaik... i know it takes a while (like 5-10minutes) for it to work on my pc than my sister's windows 8.1 pc running on the same 840EVO 250GB that only took like 5 seconds lol. wow 20mins? the performance bug/restoration tool took like 2-3 hours for mine maybe because my hdd is filled to the brim, only got like 40GB left after 10% over provisioning. |
|
|
Oct 23 2014, 03:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Oct 23 2014, 02:53 PM) uh? don't use that if you have applied the fix. that fix is supposed to fix everything so that 840 evo will become a 'normal' ssd again. this basically:defragmentation is not good for ssd (it's actually for hdd only), and normal ssd doesn't need it. all you need is trim, it's already built-in in w8.x (right click on the drive, select properties, then click the optimize button under 'optimize and defragment drive' area). alternatively, you can use magician's optimization feature. also, leave your machine alone for a few hours during weekends for ssd self optimizations (i.e. garbage collection, gc). however, when the drive becomes terribly slow, (usually after a year or two, but the time frame depends on your usage also) you can do a secure erase to 'refresh' the drive back to its factory state. -- yes, if your drive is filled with stuff it will take longer http://www.mydefrag.com/faqgeneralinformat...memorydisk.html since i'm on Vista, it does help a lot my pc is on 24/7 with no automatic turn off from windows (or set to some very high value like 1-2 hours of idle), so the drive have plenty of time to do it's work. Never really had very slow performance and merely doing it just for prevention. i only do the defrag thing once every 2-3 months. |
|
|
Oct 23 2014, 05:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Oct 23 2014, 05:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Oct 23 2014, 05:38 PM) haha mobo's don't provide these. i need it because i have a bare m.2 ssd only. i have seen many pci-e ssd's like intel p3000 series, which are already prepackaged nicely. all you need to do is plug and play i think the sockets for those m.2 that the x99 mobo come with are in very limited space so a heat sink wouldn't fit.i am seeing some of the are placed in between actual pci-e slots |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 05:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(silrave @ Oct 30 2014, 12:33 AM) gg actually my mobo only support SATA2, so to be honest, neither samsung/intel will have much difference when it comes to performance because you're already bottlenecked by the interface.i think will get around november problem is my mobo only support till sata 2 cant really get full speed of ssd yet wait until end of year upgrade mobo then should be support full speed haiz ... dunno go for samsung or intel lol confusing le lol XD I personally went for samsung because of the price and also due to the hype. i was affected by the firmware issue but again, it wasn't that noticeable because performance in regards to SSD is barely noticeable in real world applications unless you're looking at synthetic benchmarks all day. i gotten the 840EVO 250GB since march, until now no issue (also updated the firmware/fix applied) gotten another 840EVO 250GB for my sis's gaming pc just last month which is also affected by the old file issue, firmware/fix also applied and performance is insane especially when the pc is on the latest windows 8.1 + RAPID mode. transfers are in the gbit/sec (lol RAPID) and windows boot up/shutdown is in the 3seconds +/- everything is snappy as hell lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 05:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Oct 30 2014, 01:30 AM) putting aside 'fake' performance, samsung still produce some of the top ssd's in terms of reliability, endurance, and speed. these days many oem manufacturers are putting samsung drives in their products (consumer and enterprise alike). there is one thing weird about intel drives, but that's just my thought. if i can gather more proofs i will share with you guys. i think the OEM are going with Samsung due to price advantage over say, intel.i stopped using my samsung 840 evo too, and am getting ready to test if there is anything wrong about the old data on them later. it needs time to validate this part. the old files about samsung 840EVO is very real, my >3 months unmodified/untouched files can transfer as low as 10-20MB/sec, that's as bad as eco/low rpm (say 5400?) regular HDD drives did a cleanup/minor backup/windows or driver updating etc prior to installing the fix as a normal habit and noticed some really funky speeds LOL |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 05:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(silrave @ Nov 3 2014, 05:33 PM) eh sorry, should be GByte/sec lol...RAPID is just absurd at times when it comes to benchmarks but on real world application, loading windows in 2-3 seconds (heck the BIOS POST screen takes longer time ROFL!) and virtually ANY application loading the moment you double click it... is just amazing my opinion: if you're going to be sitting on that SATA2 3bit for long, and not using windows 8.1, maybe intel would be a better choice just for the warranty and firmware reliability. if you're upgrading mobo, and/or already on windows 8.1 with decent memory space and can allocate bigger over provisioning, samsung 840evo 250GB will be a very fun drive |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 05:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Nov 3 2014, 05:51 PM) yeah price is definitely samsung's advantage if you're talking about common sata/msata variants. however it's not just that. what surprised me was the adoption of pci-e x4 m.2 ssd's in asus g-series released recently (especially g751, g771). by the way, asus's implementations with these m.2 ssd's are by far the better one (i.e. m.2 bracket serves 2 purposes: as a placeholder, and as a heat spreader) interesting on samsung's m.2 implementations, surprises me as well.haha right we were all affected by the slow read bug in 840 evo. after the update that bug seemed to be gone. just now i checked the read speeds of my 840 evo and they were good. will do tests again after a few weeks. i supposed ASUS's SATA express drive is supplied by samsung too? the casing is a very beautiful brushed/anodized aluminum cover which i believe also serve as head spreading. do let us know on the 840evo speeds; So far so good on my end |
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 03:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Nov 3 2014, 06:40 PM) i have no idea about asus' sata-e drive. imo sata-e will not gain popularity very soon. it is too bulky. yeah will post an update here samsung 840 evo, 500gb sata: [attachmentid=4199146] samsung 840 evo, 500gb msata: [attachmentid=4199147] edit: as comparisons, here are the results of samsung sm841, and crucial m500. samsung sm841, 512gb sata: [attachmentid=4199166] crucial m500, 960gb sata: [attachmentid=4199168] [attachmentid=4199169] ![]() damn sexy aluminum bro http://techreport.com/review/26401/a-first...-storage-device http://www.legitreviews.com/asus-hyper-exp...-preview_140186 http://www.legitreviews.com/asus-hyper-exp...ntel-z97_140391 still very new, some kinks here and there. however it looks like the 2.5" size won't be making it to the final retail? i really like the aluminum case though nice update with the 840evo btw |
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 11:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Nov 4 2014, 09:06 AM) oh this one. yeah looks are all good. it's like msi super raid2 in their high-end laptops. sadly this one is taking forever too... and the raid implementation imho seems weird and seems like something that is potentially detrimental to ssd (1 250gb > 2 128gb raid 0 and so on)previously i waited for their pci-e adapter kit for m.2 ssd. unfortunately it took like forever so i just went for bplus :/ |
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 12:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Nov 4 2014, 12:11 PM) hopefully it's not a teaser. not to say harm the ssd as in it's health; more towards performance reduction when comparing single ssd vs raid 0 so long interface bandwidth is not limited.yeah to me it's an enclosure with a raid card inside it. because of compact form factors, we can put msata or m.2 ssd's inside. (i think it can at least take up to 3x full-size msata) 2x 128gb should be minimum. max maybe 3x 1tb? (if 3x ports are provided. the bottleneck might be the total bandwidth supported by sata-e if it's nvme hehehe) i think it does no harm to ssd. (it's just normal raid 0) as long as trim is supported performance should be good. heck even with the limitation, most real life applications or even certain synthetic benchmarks still seem to favor single ssd (higher capacity) over RAID0 ones despite the supposedly obvious performance gains. iinm it's how data is being seeked/striped, and having to go through 2 paths to obtain 1 single data vs a single path. previously on conventional mechanical hdd raid0 is always superior due to slower seeks thanks to the nature of mechanical drives. SSD however changed all that. |
|
|
Nov 6 2014, 04:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(horns @ Nov 5 2014, 10:13 PM) ok story time this. basically.technically, to get rid of bottlenecks by sata's bandwidth limitation, pci-e is used to provide more bandwidth to ssd so that it can run much faster in a system. commercially, most people thought pci-e 2.0 x2 is good enough for the market. (so that they can earn more money before releasing more powerful versions, i.e. from pci-e 2.0 x2 to 2.0 x4, then 3.0 x2, finally 3.0 x4. you know the drill) however, two companies thought otherwise. the first one was samsung. instead of following the norm, they released xp941, a pci-e 2.0 x4 m.2 ssd to oem in year 2013 (that's the first pci-e consumer-centric ssd). with that move samsung was forcing everyone to change their game plans, including totally skipped pci-e x2 to be at least competitive. initially there were not much enthusiasm among these oem. until the second company reacted. a few months ago, asrock put an ultra m.2 slot (1x pci-e 3.0 x4) in their product lineup, the extreme series. back then, those were the only mobo that provides such a m.2 slot. on top of that, despite this premium feature, they sold them cheap. that move made asrock to suddenly become one of the best recognized mobo manufacturers almost everywhere, and their products were recommended and awarded in macam-macam best awards. all the above happened in a year. see? these companies really can make a difference if they want to. now the market is populated with compatible slots. (desktop mobo's, laptops) this year samsung did it again to complete the whole story. this time they announced sm951, the first consumer-centric pci-e 3.0 x4 nvme ssd. (sm953 is for enterprise) maybe we can get hold some of these beasty ssd sometimes next year edit: this was one of the reasons why i got a lot of samsung drives. (more than 10 hehe) i am not their affiliate, or fan boy, or whatever you wanna call it. i just wanna support companies like this to make a difference in the development of better ssd's. (only ssd. the rest i am not that keen hehehe) pretty much why i went with TWO 840EVOS too XD This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Nov 6 2014, 04:14 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0250sec
0.82
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 09:18 AM |