QUOTE(Boon3 @ Jul 2 2013, 10:05 AM)
Objection!

I still don't like the name. Hehe..
I feel there's a valid point here.
Two stocks come in mind.
Muhibbah, which got into big trouble with its receivables from APH.
Wasn't APH deemed to be 'safe' at one point.
and then we have the political mess with Puncak Niaga.
444 days average is extremely high.
What I will also do is take into consideration on how fast the receivables is growing.
For example, end of 211, CPark had 200 million in receivables.
Alex now notes that CPark has 260 million in receivables.
We get receivables growing 60 million in one and a half years.
That's a lot.

During this one and a half years period, CPark only recorded some 42 million in net profits.
For me, this says the receivables is growing more than its profits.
Which is no good la.
Badly managed.
Did I say the name is lousy too?

The other question still is why.
Why so much?
Why so long?

Wah you manyak free today ah?
In the receivables, RM 169 million is unbilled sales for work perform. You know lar contarctor usually have to do work first before can claim progressive completion & payment. ie. payment when 30%, 70%, 100% complete. This is similar to property unbilled sales mah, that one no one complain.
ER works require performance guarantee and maintenance usually 10%-20% of contract amount, held for 1 year or more. Contractors know lar this point, but it is a risk also.
APH is private venture (with govt backing) and puncak niaga is billed to state government. Cpark bill to federal government.
Anyway i think the name is approriate... you turn rubbish dump into nice green hill with solar power on top. So from Sai-> park = Cypark!
This post has been edited by gark: Jul 2 2013, 10:22 AM