RM player movement is superior than us, and of coz RONALDO make the difference.

We do have 2 others goal chances like IVA header and HAZARD 1 on 1. And i dont really like HAZARD holding the ball for so long, he is better off release the ball earlier to be fast and swift rather than give opponent time to read the game.

This post has been edited by chitchat: Aug 8 2013, 11:30 AM

LOL they say our success was giving MADRID 3-1 to us, but they forgot our success also give them 2-1 DROGBA !!! there goes their only chance to win a cup again

Well under CA, he still a bench warmer that prove JM decision was not only because of grudges

This post has been edited by chitchat: Aug 29 2013, 09:34 AM

Is not allowed, FA does not allow loan player to play against parent club to prevent any controversy of course. I think MOSES going to LIV was not really that good move, LIV have brought in a lot youngster for that position so i doubt he will get much playing times, i would prefer he go to WBA or some other team that make him an automatic starter. But if the move is potential sell in future then i have no complain.

Really disappointed with the LUKAKU loan, feel sad for him, that guy bleed blue blood, he is true CHELSEA fans. When finally his dream come true signing for the club he love, he never really get to play for the club. He been send to the reserve playing with boys when he was a belgium international player with europa league experience, he went to WBA banging goals but again he was deem surplus because of that someone by the name of TORRES hogging the spot. I can accept TORRES not performing and happy to see he is still trying hard but enough is enough, his poor performance not only dragging the team down, but now worse, he is blocking the future. DROGBA have to go because of him, STUR same, LUKAKU might be soon if the club dont handle the situation well. Please just sell TORRES.

I believe JM feel he need a proven striker as his first eleven, he know he is not going to get it with TORRES, while LUKAKU still lack of experience thus he signed ETO. It would have been better if ETO was the experience with LUKAKU the apprentice and BA the backup. But i believe there is not a club that wanted TORRES or he himself will agree to a move, and benching TORRES as 3rd striker was not really an option given pressure from high up. Thus LUKAKU was deem the surplus.

Well some prefer BA to go on loan but i believe LUKAKU go on loan instead is a better move. Why waste LUKAKU sit on bench as 3rd striker if he can get more game time on loan ? But i would have prefer him to go back to WBA instead of EVERTON, because S.CLARK is there and have been treating him well last season, LUKAKU have also familiar with WBA setup so natural could be more game time for him. While at EVERTON he have to impress again, even so is hard for him to be the first striker because of one reason, he is a loan player, manager wont risk neglecting their club own striker for a sake of loan player.