agree wif u

tutle v1.3 fc is better but v1.5 same same je...ask my colleague who is drivinf turtle v1.5...fc is same as mine only...

ur car 24/7 fnf mode and evrytime high speed one... brake pad finish after 16000km+

I meant go change car to turtle so that you can afford Diet Coke, Nuff.

seems legit...

Nuff said!

morning~ flyday.. then holiday =D

hmm been hearing ppl say the fc of persona is high, but use until nw i thk quite good.

can accept.

This post has been edited by nickyclp: Sep 13 2013, 11:31 AM

fc is acceptable...jz wanna try out some stuff to reduce fc.i c honda city fc is good... can consider to buy that car...

my frn honda city E same fc like me. except for the previous one honda city idsi.

tat one superb fc but i feel less power.

when wan speed, bo kick.

Why changed from turtle or dugong?

whc better?

Sama teruk.

itu honda clustermeter very thr nice! Nuff said!

I'm also having a City 2006 VTEC. Believe me when I said, in terms of torque and acceleration pickup, it can kill PE anytime, even with a LCP on. I seriously doubt the new City will have fc like PE unless your friend really heavy footed.

After experiencing PE handling......city handling sucked big time, even with a rear cross bar (behind rear seat) and 4 point UR front strut bar.

This post has been edited by Cavino: Sep 13 2013, 01:58 PM

the new honda city can easily achieve 7.xL/100km
my penang colleague driving the honda city in penang island can achieve 7.5~7.8L/100km averagely...

true that Nuff said!
btw ur city fuelly record very nice...
test drive my fren newly bought city 2 weeks ago...i like it for highway cruising/relaxing mode city driving. for hard cornering...

Yeah, cruising is fun due to smooth uninterrupted drive with not much engine noise. That city fuelly is practically 90-95% city drive in Klang. Avg 13km/l.

When I last drive to Damansara daily via NKVE but jam in Klang and PJ, it hit at avg. 14.5km/l to avg 15.5km/h. I can fill an full extra tank every month vs PE fuel filling now.

This post has been edited by Cavino: Sep 13 2013, 02:05 PM

shud be.. he told me 30L for around 350-370km.

100% city drive.

any big diff between idsi n vtec? the one i test drive is idsi.

This post has been edited by nickyclp: Sep 13 2013, 02:12 PM

Low range torque wise, idsi a bit stronger BUT when hit mid-range and above, idsi will begin to struggle after 120km/h. That's where vtec excel when the 2nd rocker up moves...VTEC activated. Once activated, speed will goes up so smoothly and effortlessly to 140>160>180 very easily. 88hp vs 110....that is both with minimal torque loss due to CVT tranny and electric steering.

iDSI was discontinued later BECOZ although in closed environment testing, it saves FC better than VTEC but in real life, its actually not much difference in FC savings, a minor bit only. Overall performance especially at mid-high range suffers a lot vs VTEC thus could not justify the miniscule FC savings over VTEC. Overall VTEC performance is much stronger overall be it low range (almost similar), mid range (almost similar too but VTEC pull ahead much easily when approaching higher speed).

That's when idsi consume fc like mad coz not enuf power to climb. VTEC will also makan minyak like mad once activated but the way it zoom up to 180km/h is so effortless its worth it if you're in a hurry.

The meter cluster of VTEC is a bit cartoonish but I like it a lot.....similar to sport meter vs the boring meter of idsi.

Habuk landing at LYN.

ini ninja..