I feel sorry for the thread starter. But unfortunately the seller has specifically mention that he wont take responsiblity if spoil during delivery by poslaju.
yes, most of d sellers stated tis to protect themself But i feel as a responsible seller, u should try to compensate him. Maybe not compensating him full amount. One suggestion is maybe seller should return buyer the profit the seller make from the lcd. Some more if this is one in a hundred, i dont think the seller will lose anything. In fact it may built confidence for other buyer to trade with the seller.
The reason i say so is because it is like saying " Pls park at ur own risk" but receive money for allowing that person to park. I know legally the seller might not be wrong but talking about ethic, i feel it is questionable.
in tis case, it's just like u ordered a TV from a shop n u agreed to send it via 3rd party postage, but when u receive it, d TV was cracked, so shud the shopkeeper refund (the profit oni) to u bcoz of mishandling by the 3rd party courier? in other words, if u were in my shoe, wud u be responsible over d carelessness of d poslaju ppl? as a responsible seller, i've done my best wif my supplier to help to claim tis LCD under Manufactured Defect though it's not.In this case, i would really suggestion the seller to stop allowing the shippment for lcd using postage. since this is an expensive item for most and fragile, i feel cod is more appropriate as it reduces the risk of "unfavourable outcome." Ya, ur sale will definitely drop but i feel it is the right thing to do.
Everybody is using POSLAJU to ship their item, regardless it's cheap or expensive or fragile, if POSLAJU is really tat unreliable, i dun think POSLAJU will exist, n 100% of d item i've posted was delivered without going missing, but Accidents do happen sumtimes, tat's y i stated there tat i DO NOT GUARANTEE in order to protect myself,but i dun think it makes sense tat i shud stop shipping my items just bcoz of one accident tat's not even caused by me,how bout others? As for lowyat admin, my opinion is that if this type of case is not resolve between buyer and seller, i guess it is appropriate for the admin to introduce another indication to label these sellers. This indication should not be use to blacklist seller but just merely to inform prospect buyer that "there has been unfavourable trade that invlove this seller"
It is up to the prospect buyer to find out what has happen and decide whether he/she want to continue with the purchase.
Pls note that i am merely giving my opinion. I have no relationship with the buyer or the seller and no intention to side on any party. I just happen to come across this thread and would like to give my opinion on this matter.
Lastly, I would like to apologise to any party if they feel i have hurt their feelings while voicing my opinion.