Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Machines vs Free Weights

views
     
M.Ali
post Jun 27 2013, 04:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
QUOTE(alien9 @ Jun 27 2013, 04:27 AM)
This is a quote from a 6-times Mr. Olympia Dorian Yates regarding squatting on smith machine:

"Then, squatting on a Smith machine, I could position my body so it was much more isolated on the quads, less glutes and lower back involvement, didn't have to worry about the balance aspect. Actually my legs improved a lot when I was doing Smith squats, hack squats, leg presses — I could isolate the thighs a lot more. So actually I used the Smith machine quite a bit for squatting."

http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_articl...yates_interview

I'll trust DY compared to Mehdi anytime.

p/s: That 2nd article was written 10 years ago. Technology flies fast these days when Billions USD have been funded for inventing and proving machines for BB.
*
Seems like someone didn't really read my reply thoroughly. I said free weights are more complex while machines are more isolated, targeting specific-muscle groups more than free weights. Like Dorian said, if I want to focus more on the QUADS I'd do smith, when free weights squats focus a lot on the lower thigh muscles and lower back. Anyways, I'd rather build more functional muscles than structural muscles that will only hinder my athletic abilities.
alien9
post Jun 27 2013, 04:22 PM

These stars mean nothing
*******
Senior Member
3,030 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Jelatek / Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(M.Ali @ Jun 27 2013, 04:07 PM)
Seems like someone didn't really read my reply thoroughly. I said free weights are more complex while machines are more isolated, targeting specific-muscle groups more than free weights. Like Dorian said, if I want to focus more on the QUADS I'd do smith, when free weights squats focus a lot on the lower thigh muscles and lower back. Anyways, I'd rather build more functional muscles than structural muscles that will only hinder my athletic abilities.
*
Sorry for the wrong bold. I'm trying to quote on '10 Reasons Why Squatting In The Smith Machine Sucks' from Mehdi by countering with quote from 6-times Mr.O about squatting using smith machine.
kevintth
post Jul 2 2013, 04:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,618 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(decypher @ Jun 3 2013, 05:10 PM)
Hi guys,

In most gyms there are many kinds of machines for strength training. There is, usually, also a free weights area with the mirrors and benches.

Which do you prefer?

I understand that machines may restrict movement and free weights allow a wider range of motion, but it takes time to learn about how to use the dumbbells and barbells correctly.

Do you move from machines to free weights when the machines no longer satisfy you, as in, not resistant enough?

Cheerios
*
IMO... Free weight is like more for building mass, machines are more for those who do not want the trouble to add in / remove plates and can go for next set in short period.

QUOTE(bonzaimy @ Jun 26 2013, 12:18 AM)
I like to ise machine but seldom ise it because people cannot re rack the plate. And its not a freaking 10kg but more than 100kg on each side.I dont understand this kind of attitude.
*
Forgive them lolx... they're big enough to lift super heavy weight, but exhausted cant rerack/put back the weight haha...
healthesick
post Jul 7 2013, 03:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
262 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: PJ


free weight are normally almost full body workout
jamezax
post Jul 10 2013, 09:08 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: May 2012
I will say both are usefull
zulayuka
post Jul 11 2013, 06:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
I like to use free weights because it uses more muscles to keep the balance and works out more than just isolating one muscle group.

But then I would move to the machines during my workouts to make sure I isolate those particular muscle groups during my session.

I feel that doing both during my work out helps with my core when doing free weights and then I can really push the muscle group I;m training that day with the machines.

especially machines that allow individual movements for example you can pull with one arm at a time. That means I can mold my body to whatever shape I want.

If I feel weaker on my left then I'll work on it more
darklight79
post Jul 12 2013, 06:57 PM

I'll eat your food
Group Icon
Elite
9,006 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: PJ


QUOTE(alien9 @ Jun 27 2013, 04:22 PM)
Sorry for the wrong bold. I'm trying to quote on '10 Reasons Why Squatting In The Smith Machine Sucks' from Mehdi by countering with quote from 6-times Mr.O about squatting using smith machine.
*
Mehdi is an idiot.
TSdecypher
post Jan 20 2014, 11:23 AM

低头族
*****
Senior Member
864 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Earth


QUOTE(manapergi @ Jan 18 2014, 04:10 PM)
I feel the real weight in curl bar but the same weight eg 20kg is much lighter in cable machine.  Guess those roller has deflected quite some weights.
*
Could it also be the weight of the curl bar?

If you lift 20kg plates with the curl bar then you need to take into account the curl bar too because you are also lifting it.
SUSmoko123456789
post Jan 20 2014, 02:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
114 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
try all and feel which contract your muscle the most
silasya77
post Jan 21 2014, 09:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
71 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(alien9 @ Jun 27 2013, 04:22 PM)
Sorry for the wrong bold. I'm trying to quote on '10 Reasons Why Squatting In The Smith Machine Sucks' from Mehdi by countering with quote from 6-times Mr.O about squatting using smith machine.
*
Well I wouldn't listen to EVERYTHING someone on roids says... biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by silasya77: Jan 21 2014, 09:17 PM
alien9
post Jan 21 2014, 10:23 PM

These stars mean nothing
*******
Senior Member
3,030 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Jelatek / Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(silasya77 @ Jan 21 2014, 09:16 PM)
Well I wouldn't listen to EVERYTHING someone on roids says...  biggrin.gif
*
Um, so you said that just with Steroids, you can grow big and become Mr. Olympia? Sweet! Now lets eat clen and tren hard and become Mr. Olympia.

This post has been edited by alien9: Jan 21 2014, 10:24 PM
silasya77
post Jan 22 2014, 10:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
71 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(alien9 @ Jan 21 2014, 10:23 PM)
Um, so you said that just with Steroids, you can grow big and become Mr. Olympia? Sweet! Now lets eat clen and tren hard and become Mr. Olympia.
*
Uhm, did I? Nope. Not whatsoever. Mr O's deserve to be Mr O's because of their genetics and their training. All who compete in them however, use steroids and it is a fact that steroid users can get away with training styles that prove ineffective to the average natty. Just cuz it worked for them doesnt mean it works for someone who is not enhanced. I'm not saying EVERYTHING they say is not true or factual, I'm just saying that variables are variables and they are different for the average natural lifter. Am I saying Medhi iz teh better or whatever? No. I'm just saying that Yates is an IFBB Pro and Medhi is a natural. Sure his physique aint all that great but not everything he says is wrong either.

I'm no supporter of either. My basis is more towards factual science behind the lifts than 'what is wrong or right in broscience terms'. There's always truth to everything, but the hard part is figuring it out. I really like Jason Blaha's training ideology, for example.

This post has been edited by silasya77: Jan 22 2014, 10:11 PM
GameFr3ak
post Jan 22 2014, 10:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,849 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Your Location


QUOTE(manapergi @ Jan 18 2014, 04:10 PM)
I feel the real weight in curl bar but the same weight eg 20kg is much lighter in cable machine.  Guess those roller has deflected quite some weights.
*
It doesn't matter much. Though there is a slight difference in resistance curve but if the resistance on the machine is too light, simply add more weight.

The muscle doesn't know if you're curling a truck or a boat..
alien9
post Jan 23 2014, 09:59 AM

These stars mean nothing
*******
Senior Member
3,030 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Jelatek / Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(silasya77 @ Jan 22 2014, 10:07 PM)
Uhm, did I? Nope. Not whatsoever. Mr O's deserve to be Mr O's because of their genetics and their training. All who compete in them however, use steroids and it is a fact that steroid users can get away with training styles that prove ineffective to the average natty. Just cuz it worked for them doesnt mean it works for someone who is not enhanced. I'm not saying EVERYTHING they say is not true or factual, I'm just saying that variables are variables and they are different for the average natural lifter. Am I saying Medhi iz teh better or whatever? No. I'm just saying that Yates is an IFBB Pro and Medhi is a natural. Sure his physique aint all that great but not everything he says is wrong either.

I'm no supporter of either. My basis is more towards factual science behind the lifts than 'what is wrong or right in broscience terms'. There's always truth to everything, but the hard part is figuring it out. I really like Jason Blaha's training ideology, for example.
*
So this wall of text is simply just to expand what you said earlier?

QUOTE(silasya77 @ Jan 21 2014, 09:16 PM)
Well I wouldn't listen to EVERYTHING someone on roids says...  biggrin.gif
*
This is H&F, not a single one liner reply thread like in /k. If you want to say anything, then just say it. Don't just send a one liner and then after being quoted then you want to reply with wall of text doh.gif

About the issue, IFBB Pro are the guys who want to be the best in building physique. Sure, they take roids but they have perfect diet, stacks of supplements and they trained more than normal gym goers do. What they train from 30 weeks off to the day of competition might be what you trained in a year.

So whose advice should I heed? You who have just a few years of experience under your belt and aiming to just have a good body or the one who started really early, have a lots of experience and really want to be the best in the world?

Just because they take roids, doesn't mean that they doesn't have any knowledge or whatsoever.
silasya77
post Jan 24 2014, 03:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
71 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(alien9 @ Jan 23 2014, 09:59 AM)
So this wall of text is simply just to expand what you said earlier?
This is H&F, not a single one liner reply thread like in /k. If you want to say anything, then just say it. Don't just send a one liner and then after being quoted then you want to reply with wall of text  doh.gif

About the issue, IFBB Pro are the guys who want to be the best in building physique. Sure, they take roids but they have perfect diet, stacks of supplements and they trained more than normal gym goers do. What they train from 30 weeks off to the day of competition might be what you trained in a year.

So whose advice should I heed? You who have just a few years of experience under your belt and aiming to just have a good body or the one who started really early, have a lots of experience and really want to be the best in the world?

Just because they take roids, doesn't mean that they doesn't have any knowledge or whatsoever.
*
Like I said. My sentence made it clear, but you seemed to take it the wrong way or something so I had to elaborate. I gave no advice whatsoever, merely stating that someone on drugs would train differently compared to someone not on drugs. I'm not telling you what to do. You could do whatever the heck you wanted to. And who am I to judge if you'd rather take the advice of someone that's enhanced compared to someone who's philosophy is natural training, even though he admittedly has a few kinks in his logic and perception compared to everyone else. I couldn't give a rat's ass who's advice you heed, I heed, or anyone heeds. I didn't post to be analysed or put forth a 'You're wrong because I'm right blah blah blah' mentality. Everything goes both ways. But I'm sticking in the middle ground personally. There's truth in everything.

So lemme do me, and I'll let you do you guess. Can't we just all agree to disagree? There is no 'law' set in stone with these things. Merely pedestals in which people keep setting on. mega_shok.gif

This post has been edited by silasya77: Jan 24 2014, 04:05 PM
-Dan
post Jan 24 2014, 09:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,382 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(silasya77 @ Jan 22 2014, 02:07 PM)
Uhm, did I? Nope. Not whatsoever. Mr O's deserve to be Mr O's because of their genetics and their training. All who compete in them however, use steroids and it is a fact that steroid users can get away with training styles that prove ineffective to the average natty. Just cuz it worked for them doesnt mean it works for someone who is not enhanced. I'm not saying EVERYTHING they say is not true or factual, I'm just saying that variables are variables and they are different for the average natural lifter. Am I saying Medhi iz teh better or whatever? No. I'm just saying that Yates is an IFBB Pro and Medhi is a natural. Sure his physique aint all that great but not everything he says is wrong either.

I'm no supporter of either. My basis is more towards factual science behind the lifts than 'what is wrong or right in broscience terms'. There's always truth to everything, but the hard part is figuring it out. I really like Jason Blaha's training ideology, for example.
*
But hang on, lemme give you a bicep shot.
razorboy
post Jan 25 2014, 09:24 PM

#winning
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(-Dan @ Jan 24 2014, 09:59 PM)
But hang on, lemme give you a bicep shot.
*
Attached Image

But in all seriousness, come on guys, it doesn't have to get heated up like this every time we have a discussion
silasya77
post Jan 26 2014, 05:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
71 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(-Dan @ Jan 24 2014, 09:59 PM)
But hang on, lemme give you a bicep shot.
*
laugh.gif
silasya77
post Jan 26 2014, 05:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
71 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(razorboy @ Jan 25 2014, 09:24 PM)
Attached Image

But in all seriousness, come on guys, it doesn't have to get heated up like this every time we have a discussion
*
Does it heat up often around here? I have no intention of causing conflict at all haha. I just believe everyone must attain their own opinion not solely from one source, but to form their own opinion off of every aspect of life.
kellyisevil
post Mar 17 2014, 10:03 AM

jellywelly
******
Senior Member
1,240 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: jellyfishlake
I dont like machines.
I am a girl 169cm and I feel that the range of motion from machines are more suitable for men

I prefer free weights and compound movement *deadlift,squat*

nothing against machine, my bf prefer machine during isolation training smile.gif

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0327sec    1.20    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 10:12 PM