Hi guys, my dad is planning to buy a brand new Nissan Teana 2.5L V6. However, many reports have said that the fuel consumption of the car is very high. We are quite worried, because fuel prices are most definitely going to be increased as part of the governments move to cut subsidies. I would like those who actually own a Nissan Teana 2.5L V6 to share with me your experiences :

1) How fuel efficient is the car ?

2) How is the driving performance ? (because CVT is known to be sluggish)

3) Why do I see many 2.0L Teana instead of 2.5L ? Is it because of the cheaper price or because the 2.0L is poweful enough ?

4) Any problems you have faced with the car ?


Thanks guys !!


Attached thumbnail(s)

dont expect fuel consumption of 2.5 V6 to do magic, that is impossible.

and in reality, FC depends on how strong is ur right foot on the accelerator. if drive kancil like drive F1, also no point to argue about FC.

if FC is really a concern, please consider hybrid cars, plenty of choices now.

as for ur question no.3, the answer is pretty simple, its basically the same theory for people who bought Merc C200 (i just take Merc for example, not related with ur Teana anyway), what they want is the car, the brand, the image/status, without bothering what's under the hood. this is the typical mentality of 99% malaysia people.

If afford to buy teana, still will concern about FC?

many people buy 2.0 because of the roadtax as well.. 2.0 to 2.5 very big difference in the roadtax

Yes, the report is correct. It was confirmed in Australia that Teana 2.5 V6 guzzles more fuel than Camry 2.4L, Accord 2.4L, Mazda 6 2.5L and K5/Sonata 2.4L. Carmakers have dropped 2.5L v6 due to less practical, weak on torque, high FC and expensive maintenance. 3.0L V6 is ok but anything smaller than that is inline4 for 2.0L and 2.5L.

1) How fuel efficient is the car ?
>> N-brand marketing staff kept saying VVT does not save FC. Cefiro A33 2.5L V6 returns 6km/L in city driving, the Teana is using the same old 2.5L V6 therefore FC won't be any better.

2) How is the driving performance ? (because CVT is known to be sluggish)
>> Teana, SYlphy, X-Trail CVT gearbox is the first generation that has very small first few gears and reverse gear. Start moving from idle will be sluggish and have to wait for the moveable face to enlarge/shrink size to represent 1st, 2nd, 3rd gear.

3) Why do I see many 2.0L Teana instead of 2.5L ? Is it because of the cheaper price or because the 2.0L is poweful enough ?
>> They throw CRA2Y discount like mad, Teana 2.0L is sold cheaper than Sonata low spec. That is why there are more 2.0L. The 2.5L, due to fuel guzzling and still expensive after huge discount, why bother to buy when you can go for Mazda 6?

4) Any problems you have faced with the car ?
>> Maintenance heavier than other Japanese D-segment and also Korean D-segment. 6 cylinders mean you have to fork out extra for the 2 more spark plugs, cables, valves, etc. CVT gearbox service interval at 20,000km, NS2 ATF fluid at RM400 and labour charge RM200.

buying a 2.5L V6 and expect good FC...haha
not gonna be good FC

The only difference one would consider a V6 against Inline 4 is the engine response and smoothness.
No inline 4 engines can have the same smooth acceleration compared to Inline6 and V6. It's built to be vibration and rattling free.

But if that's not a concern, then just go for Inline 4 engines.

I think there are much better choices than that

he is comparing between 4 cyl vs 6 cyl.



i don't see any comparison between brand made by him.

I driving V6 2.5l

Paying 7.7km per liter.

Agree with these! So it's not because the 2.0 is powerful enough (it only produce a very ordinary 136ps/190nm pushing around 1.5 tons! All cars in this segment which use 2.0 NA engines are hopelessly underpowered, but most people in Malaysia don't care about this aspect.


Well it depends on how efficient is your expectation. I'm driving a 2.5ltr V6 and my best can get 10.7km/ltr combined city/highway on RON95, which for me is not bad for a 1.5 ton RWD car producing >200Hp that's already about 5yrs old. But if you're expecting like >13km/ltr then maybe have to consider smaller cars. Having said that, maybe the new Mazda 6 can be that efficient, CMIIW.
Most important though is your right foot, I'm sure my car can be more efficient if I drive more patiently like some people.

Agree with this! 6 cylinder engines by design is very balanced, like a V10 & V12, hence pretty much vibration free and very smooth. 4 cylinder engine still requires something like a balance shaft, and will never be that smooth.

haha....agree
i'm driving a mitsu mirage.....if i drive patiently, can really get good FC
but i like to speed, so its around 18-19KM/L
some user posted result....1 bar = RM7 can get RM120KM but acceleration must be patient

TS, no offense to Teana owners, Nissan brand or your father's choice, but may i suggest u put Mazda 6 / Ford Mondeo into consideration?

If u want a good fc with same segment, go for mazda 6

I drive a 2.5V6 Teana. Heavy footed. Usually commute between PJ and Cheras Selatan/Balakong. Usual speed 120-140 km/h. Comsumption = 9.2km/l after 50,000km (1.5 years usage)

Hi,

http://www.mudah.my/Nissan+Skyline+A+2+5+0...eg-18677358.htm

Check this out.

If you like Teana 2.5, you may be interested in this.

The high fuel consumption may be the disadvantage. But the advantage is that it is better and cheaper than teana 2.5.

But really, if i consider this car, the fuel consumption is the least of my worries.

Being an accountant, i don't believe in purchasing expensive cars. hehehe

This is my opinion.

For long driving or travel, good to have V6. But for city driving better get 4 cylinder only. I have experience 406 V6 3.0.

Yeah this car is a really good option since it's >200HP and RWD with all the luxury as well! I was also considering this when I got my Mark X as they both exact direct competitors with almost the same spec and price range. I'm sure its' FC also would not be so bad considering the extra power it gives (I think should be able to get around 9-11km/ltr as well like Mark X). The only downside is that this car is even more rare hence mechainc with expertise and parts might not be as easy to find.

Used to babysit 2 Sylphy whenever my colleagues went outstation. We love to venture into technical, we do follow up on the reliability, durability and maintenance. The CVT gearbox indeed cost much more expensive to maintain than conventional gearbox due to very short interval, expensive ATF & labour (have to use diagnostic tool everytime b4 change engine oil). It's even weaker than proper conventional 4AT when start moving from idle. FC only 8.9km/L city driving.

Don't be blinded with the word Japanese brand. T, H & N are different from each other and they don't share technology between themselves but instead, they are rivals to each other. No such thing as on par. Toyota maintenance is expensive because of the SC charges, in reality, its vital parts are most reliable, most basic and could be easily fixed. Honta is least durable and like vase, you must handle it very gently or it will break apart. N-brand, in early 2000s, Sentra N16, X-Trail and even Cefiro A33 have engine blown cases due to abnormal overheating. Frontier too have such problem and some reported Navara.

Overhaul inline4 cost RM4k+ while overhauling V6 engines a whooping RM6k+. When comes to normal maintenance and routine check, you will always have to check extra 2 for every part & thing linked to the additional 2 cylinders. You have 2 additional spark plugs, 2 additional valves, 2 additional HT cables, 2 additional ports, 2 additional etc.

By the way Cefiro V6 2.0L FC is at 6.7km/L while the 2.5L (bought used engine converted from 3.0L) at 6.2 km/L while the 3.0L brougham at 5.7km/L all in city driving. Heavier Camry 2.0G at 8.8km/L while Camry 2.4L at 8km/L. Is this good enough to prove anything? Those N-brand marketing bunch kept telling you Teana city driving 13km/L is nothing more than never exceed simulated on roller FC reading by manufacturer. In reality, Teana FC worst than any D-segment inline4 engine.

It's a beautiful car. Mine is teana 2.5, year 2011.
I've done 123k km. Fuel consumption very good and oustation is even better. For full tank, I get about 700Km (outstation) Local and 500 km.

Parts are expensive, but if you maintain it with Tan Chong, of course it's a little expensive, but you will be fully satisfied.

So far now it's been about 9vto 10 years, there has been no major problems.

It's a lovely car I would say.

Nissan Skyline is the sportier version, direct compete with T. Mark X

If similar to Teana (comfort base) would be the N. Fuga/Cima or infinity Q70, direct compete with T. Crown, Lexus GS

Waking up the dead eh!