lotsa heat in here.btw,this is different topic.
i just wana know which one is better.
chrono trigger for snes or chrono trigger for ps1?
which 1 should i play?

of course the original one is better. the ps1 version suffers from lag of menus and stuff. SNES faster.

but ps1 version got anime...if u can tahan lagg...go for ps1..

anime only
i prefer fast gameplay over the anime sequence..but that's just me la...

what is the difference between chrono trigger & chrono cross??? Issit just platform different???

chrono trigger is the 1st one which came out on the SNES...chrono cross is the sequel on the PS1.

i like the game because the cause and effect feature...i remember the first time I regret doing things without thinking of the effect and it caused me during the trial

thx PhoenixByte for clarify this. I played chrono trigger but not chrono cross.

I like it's special combination of attack and froggy is the best character!!!

Chrono Trigger is nice, but Chrono Cross is much much better game in terms of battle system and story.

I kinda thought Chrono Cross sucked hard.

I could speed-run Chrono Trigger over-and-over again within a day, 6-hours. (with new game+ of course)

I never played Chrono trigger before, but tere have been a lot of rave about how good it is. Personally i think Chrono Cross is kinnda cool. Its my 2nd RPG after FF 7.

Maybe it's just too tough for you?? Chrono Trigger is too easy...story too simple..but then again, it was an 8-bit console game, can't expect too much from that era. And why does anyone wants to replay RPGs over and over????? That's like watching repeat ASTRO show...LOL. I never replay any RPG except Final Fantasy tactics coz the battle system is too darn good.

You didn't know Chrono Trigger had 12 different endings did you? Besides, why isn't not fun to play RPG's over and over again? (looks at people who want FF7 remake, and the people who love FF series so much)

And Chrono Trigger was well much longer than 6 hours, have you tried completing it within a day? Methinks not.

And Chrono Trigger was a 16-bit game, not an 8-bit. SNES, and not NES.

[Edit] And besides, I think most people here who have played Chrono Trigger during the early days were pretty much dissapointed with Chrono Cross. If CCross was the first you played, then of course, it would 'seem' better. I don't know, just a comparison from people who loved that game.

And like most/all RPGs, the hidden factor, Magus' hidden room with his best items, special 3-person tech-striker like Crono + Frog + Ayla. And oh, Rainbow sword beats Ultima.. haha

This post has been edited by sihumchai: Jan 17 2007, 04:45 PM

wah,snes version got faster menus?dat means 16 bit outbeat 32bit,bwahaha.. i think i'll go for ps1,wana see some akira toriyama anime.
another change of topic,got any dragonquest fan's here?i never played it b4,but,this game quite huge in japan,sometime it seems like its same par with ff series.

why la the fuss about old games. been there done that.

snes faster bcoz catridge has no load times or minimal load times compared to cd whre thre is long loadin times.. esp for ps1 which has inferior cd drive.. anyhow da ps1 version suffered alot of lag..