Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
130 Pages « < 49 50 51 52 53 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

RTS Command & Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars, Patch v1.04 is available!

views
     
SpikeTwo
post Mar 5 2007, 05:10 PM

無敵 PC Elitist
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Über Special Forces Gaming Room
i dunno why there's no damage to the floor/ground once i shoot it with rockets, lasers...unlike previous titles. and trees wont burn even if i burn them. hmmm...is this in the demo only? hope the full version will have better visuals. cos the weapons look weak in this game. the only effect that i liked is the flame...the flame thrower. which looks 100x better than CoH croc tank's flame. that's the only bonus for c&c3 tho. laugh.gif

edit: cib** streamyx... thanks.

This post has been edited by SpikeTwo: Mar 5 2007, 05:11 PM
Dark Steno
post Mar 5 2007, 05:22 PM

baaaaaaa
Group Icon
VIP
4,567 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Bangi, Selangor



Agree that CoH's flames look funny.
InfiniteX
post Mar 5 2007, 06:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah


Only flames effect is good, but other effect is totally out sleep.gif animation of object also......supcom lot more better in graphic/visual effect and sound effect
Dark Steno
post Mar 5 2007, 06:35 PM

baaaaaaa
Group Icon
VIP
4,567 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Bangi, Selangor



QUOTE(InfiniteX @ Mar 5 2007, 06:22 PM)
supcom lot more better in graphic/visual effect and sound effect
*
I beg to differ. Supreme Commander's graphics are no better than C&C3.
miloy2k
post Mar 5 2007, 07:35 PM

[[[[[IMPERIAL ARMY]]]]]
********
All Stars
15,773 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Capital Wasteland



QUOTE(Dark Steno @ Mar 5 2007, 06:35 PM)
I beg to differ. Supreme Commander's graphics are no better than C&C3.
*
IMO COH is more nicer then SC brows.gif
king99
post Mar 5 2007, 07:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,188 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



COH pwned C&C !
Agent717
post Mar 5 2007, 08:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Kuala Selangor



QUOTE(king99 @ Mar 5 2007, 07:37 PM)
COH pwned C&C !
*
It's your opinion.
My opinion,
C&C pwned COH. rclxms.gif
SpikeTwo
post Mar 5 2007, 08:21 PM

無敵 PC Elitist
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Über Special Forces Gaming Room
QUOTE(Agent717(tm) @ Mar 5 2007, 08:08 PM)
It's your opinion.
My opinion,
C&C pwned COH. rclxms.gif
*
common. don't argue in a fanboy style (not only u). CoH has new and better game engine than c&c3. so there's no way c&c dated engine could do better. but i don't know why CoH flames are so lame. hahaha...cos the CoH engine could pwn c&c engine anytime, say graphics, physics, shadows, animations, lots of particles/dust, blood...you name it. those things, you dont see in C&C3, not the details, no. nay. doh.gif

it is OK to be with dated engine, but it seems something is lacking compared to previous C&C titles. lack of details. buildings wont burn even if damaged. they just collapse. hmm.gif i cant shoot and destroy those abandoned vehicles like i could in old c&c. those lil details...

This post has been edited by SpikeTwo: Mar 5 2007, 08:32 PM
Agent717
post Mar 5 2007, 08:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
209 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Kuala Selangor



QUOTE(SpikeTwo @ Mar 5 2007, 08:21 PM)
common. don't argue in a fanboy style (not only u). CoH has new and better game engine than c&c3. so there's no way c&c dated engine could do better. but i don't know why CoH flames are so lame. hahaha...cos the CoH engine could pwn c&c engine anytime, say graphics, physics, shadows, animations, lost of particles/dust, blood...you name it. those things, you dont see in C&C3, not the details, no. nay.  doh.gif

it is OK to be with date engine, but it seems something is lacking compared to previous C&C titles. lack of details. buildings wont burn even if damaged. they just collapse.  hmm.gif i cant shoot and destroy those abandoned vehicles like i could in old c&c. those lil details...
*
Well.
I love playing CoH too la bro...
It's just him...
Being so childish...
But I'm a hardcore C&C fan nod.gif
InfiniteX
post Mar 5 2007, 09:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah


QUOTE(Dark Steno @ Mar 5 2007, 06:35 PM)
I beg to differ. Supreme Commander's graphics are no better than C&C3.
*
After Heavy Attack on the Ground, it won't leave a trace!!! eg. Juggernaut!!!
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Minimal Shadow for unit! and weapon!
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

btw, not aggresive here tongue.gif , just want to prove my point of view biggrin.gif
CoH, haven't get to play that game yet... maybe later i try it out biggrin.gif
Vorador
post Mar 5 2007, 10:09 PM

Blessed !!!
*******
Senior Member
3,494 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nosgoth


Wah Supreme Commander's interface really looks like starcraft... ...

Anyone here using nVidia's 7600 to play this gaqme, does it satisfy?
InfiniteX
post Mar 5 2007, 10:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah


QUOTE(Vorador @ Mar 5 2007, 10:09 PM)
Wah Supreme Commander's interface really looks like starcraft... ...

Anyone here using nVidia's 7600 to play this gaqme, does it satisfy?
*
I am currently using 7600GT to play SupCom biggrin.gif High quality Mode, but for best result, set to medium or low if really really want to play 40km map with lot of unit biggrin.gif
Boneka
post Mar 5 2007, 10:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: jowor


i jus beat the medium nod. took me 4 hours lol rclxub.gif really hard for me at the beginning and almost lose but i rise up my empire to revenge slowly laugh.gif
seth.frostheart
post Mar 6 2007, 12:22 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: May 2006


all i can say is the fanboyism is getting a wee bit overboard... at the end of the day, its apples and oranges guys... apples n oranges...

do not compared a dated engine with a new one... in actual fact, both have their good and bad points...
InfiniteX
post Mar 6 2007, 08:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah


QUOTE(seth.frostheart @ Mar 6 2007, 12:22 AM)
all i can say is the fanboyism is getting a wee bit overboard... at the end of the day, its apples and oranges guys... apples n oranges...

do not compared a dated engine with a new one... in actual fact, both have their good and bad points...
*
I totally agree with you, both game using totally different engine, both engine got pros & cons. for eg. Supcom may not have high detail in structure but it has lot of weapon firing effect where C&C3 don't have. Another thing is the super weapon effect! in supcom, the structure will start explosion from center like a shockwave. In C&C3 the Ion Canon just like destroy all the building in the same time sleep.gif. It just don't have the feel :/
beebee
post Mar 6 2007, 08:34 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,091 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i've tried the game, and fell in love in it, what amazes me is my 3 year old pc (athlon XP, radeon 9200se) is able to support it but when both players generate more units it will lag, overall gameplay is good and i cant wait for it to be realeased
Sichiri
post Mar 6 2007, 09:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,192 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.


Just installed and played this game yesterday.

Is it just me or does the loading speed kicks total awesomeness? my missions loaded in 3 seconds!

And hoohoo star ranked mammoth XD. Rips everything apart.
Surprised to see Nod Avatar so fragile though.

This game feels like RA2. Where star-ranked stuff just ownz totally.
toughnut
post Mar 6 2007, 09:43 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,239 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
download the demo, play it for few minutes, finish first campaign. didn't bother playing skirmish. my opinion, it suck big time. the graphic just suck even with all MAX (4xAA, 8xAF). low polygon like those PS era sans the special shader effect.

the only good thing is the load time.

btw, those infantry wears flipper lol. going for a swim?

on the other hand, SupCom make my pc drag,starting from mid till the end. the graphic pretty bland but it involve huge battleground.

IMHO, CoH won lol
Chrisky
post Mar 6 2007, 10:49 AM

Romanista
*******
Senior Member
4,567 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Singapore



played all CoH, Supreme Commander, n Tiberium War, n surprisingly, Tiberium War is the only 1 that really made me excited n keep wanting more. might hav something to do wif me being a C&C fanboy lol. laugh.gif

can't wait for the real deal.
Neo18
post Mar 6 2007, 11:10 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,850 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Any of you guys manage to beat BRUTAL NOD ENEMY on balance MODE yet?


130 Pages « < 49 50 51 52 53 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1474sec    0.81    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 07:28 PM