QUOTE(Super Saiya @ Sep 11 2013, 07:28 PM)
i'm thinking to buy my first car. i have set my mind the price should be around 60k+. After some readings, i have listed 3 cars: Preve CFE, Mitsubishi Attrage and Nissan Almera.
CC: 1.6 vs 1.2 vs 1.5
Segment: C vs B vs B
Engine: Proton vs Mitsubishi vs Nissan
Let put aside FC, second value, spec, safety and design of the cars. I'm not rich, so i want to use my first car as long as i can like 15 years to 20 years if possible. Maintenance cost is also my main concern here, not sure which one is better. Is 1.2 good enough for Sedan car? i have read about Ford 1.0 ecoboost engine and some reviewers claims that this engine is powerful than current 1.6 engine Ford has. Not sure about 1.2 cc with Mitsubishi engine. i may have to travel outside of city frequently, so the car i will buy is not only for city drive. Ford, Toyota and Honda are above my budget, so i will not consider that cars.
To summarize, i need a car with:
1. long term use
2. low/good/easy maintenance
Hope you can advise/assist me on this, please.
Hi there, I am sure you will test drive all the options. For your intention on using your car up to 15 years or beyond. Any car that is above 10 years old will start to exhibit problems which require high maintenance. If possible, try not to keep your car above 10 years old. Maybe up to 15 years old if you are really tied up. WHen your salary increase with time, I am sure you will have the capacity to upgrade to better cars that are problem-free.
For city drive with a lot of traffic jams, small and lighter cars will have the advantage in low fuel consumption. However, these smaller cc vehicles such as 1.2-litre will not be so comfortable or stable as the bigger capacity vehicles in highway cruising. I don't know about Mitsubishi Attrage but you can consider Preve Turbo or Nissan Almera. Both very different vehicles. Preve Turbo for speed, power, handling and driving dynamics, Almera for slightly comfortable ride. Two of my colleagues drive the Almera.
Maintenance-wise both Preve Turbo and Almera are not really costly. The Preve Turbo's maintenance schedule is 10,000km interval using full-synthetic oil whereas the Almera's service interval is based on 5,000km I believe, using mineral oil. I presume owners of the ALmera can opt for 10,000km service. The fuel consumption of the Almera may be better than the Preve Turbo due to the lighter weight, but difference may not be that great.
I am sure you will know what to do when you test drive all your options, or even when you feel the cars in the showroom and try shutting the doors of both vehicles. If you want a safe car(heavy body) with powerful acceleration, I am sure you will not take the ALmera when you compare it with the Preve Turbo. Before I test-drive the Preve Turbo, I tested the Almera. At that time, my benchmark is Nissan Sylphy. When I stepped on the accelerator, the car felt lethargic and didn't seem to want to move forward. To me, the power is lacking. WHen I tested the Preve TUrbo, one small step on the accelerator and the car just lunges forward like a beast. The Preve Turbo is a much powerful car than the Almera.
But if you prefer a quieter drive with more comfortable suspension and lighter steering feel, then the Almera may suit you. Just pick the one that suits your driving style. See which car you enjoy driving more. Personally I think there is very little between the two in maintenance cost or even FC(although ALmera should register lower fuel consumption).
You may consider the Myvi 1.5 too which is about RM57k if I'm not mistaken.
This post has been edited by SportyHandling: Sep 11 2013, 09:06 PM