About the reviews from Anandtech on 3DMark and HTC
3DMark
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6876/microso...vices-in-3dmarkIn the 3DMark test, it is strange that the Mali400 in the Note2 does extremely well in the physics test, and fairly well in the pixel test, while it sucks in the polygon/geometry test. I wonder what kind of design tradeoff did ARM or Samsung make to end up with this result?
Or else, as pointed out in the comments, it could be due to the activation of less than all graphics/cpu cores. It doesn't make sense to have such low polygon counts, as modern games spit out more polygons and textures than physics calculations, and the chip designers know this.
I also suspect that, since 3DMark has a DirectX heritage, that may explain why the Surface Pro scores extremely well since it runs on DirectX.

any sifus want to chime in?
and the HTC one numbers:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6747/htc-one-reviewI get the feeling there is some selective benchmarking here

coz you see the Note 2 in a few tests, while it is nowhere to be seen elsewhere, especially in the battery test charts. Brian Klug is obsessed enough to indicate that there is a
barely visible (ie under high magnification only) gap at the speaker grille. He seems to ooze "I'm a fanboi" unashamedly.
Otherwise, it is a pretty good writeup as expected of an Anandtech article.
This post has been edited by joytest: Apr 6 2013, 01:54 PM