QUOTE(giovanni @ Apr 1 2013, 12:16 PM)
To be frank, this is kinda absurd. How do you know it was possible to fit an extra screen estate into that body a year back? For all I know the bezel for S3 was already quite thin back then and no one said a thing about the screen to body ratio being ridiculously skewed. In other words, no one complaint about the bezel being too big back then as well right? I know you like HTC One a lot. Doesn't HTC One have a bigger bezel?
As for your "As for the slight slimmer was nothing impossible to happen", isn't that innovation?
When it comes to the camera of S4, I aint too sure about the lens or whether or not the field or capture could be tweaked via software update but all I know is, it performs admirably well compared to S3 and in many cases better than HTC One even under low light condition.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4_...view-913p10.phpWhich part on my comment I complain on the bezel? I never complain. Even S III was less bezel than HTC one.
Also, which part I said slight slimmer is not innovation?
I never said above two part, I was said it was possible to fit in the 0.2" size base on current S III design and on Samsung successful technology on screen material.
Samsung can fit in much bigger screen on S 4 with S III body is damn innovation, this part HTC lost a lot.
As for camera narrow view issue - I said it seems obvious cannot be tweak via software because that was sensor issue, no sensor can change view base on software tweak. Did I said it perform worst than S III or HTC One? I didn't also, I just said bad move from Samsung choose narrow view on it.
You love S 4 and love Samsung, I also still like Samsung, but what the point protecting until like that simply bashing.