Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 -= MyForte - Naza Kia Forte Owners Club =- V17, Leaves You Speechless

views
     
izputra
post Feb 19 2013, 11:29 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(esmond_SP @ Feb 19 2013, 10:53 AM)
this should not happen if the aircon mode is blowing directly to passenger.. did you feel the aircon flow on the rest of the ducts (windscreen side)? if no, then there should be something wrong with the aircon ducting system (could due to the motorized flap actuator failure)
*

Yupp..i believe so. Minor flap leakage perhaps. That shouldn't be a major issue for the AC system. Try to play with the MODE button manually for several times..see how it goes

This post has been edited by izputra: Feb 19 2013, 11:36 AM
izputra
post Feb 19 2013, 11:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(jeschong @ Feb 19 2013, 11:29 AM)
my fren tried both and told me sharp is better for fresh air (duno how he define) and remove smell
he din mention dust
*
Both are air ionizers..not air purifiers. They got no dust filter..so how to remove the dust in the first place? Forte already got cabin air filter..so Forte cabin shouldn't be as dusty as other car's cabin which doesn't has air filter. Anyway, change to leather seats will greatly helps to minimize the dust. I'm using Medklinn by the way..small & neatly plugged at the cigarette lighter plug.
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 10:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(siewstl @ Feb 19 2013, 05:27 PM)
This is the meter photo ,30 km 7 50 km not light, Very odd..
*
Some say the purpose of this is to mark the minimum recommended speed to upshift to 3rd & 4th gear in the manual shiftronic mode (or is it also known as steptronic?). It sounds logical though because if we upshift too early, we might strain the engine. Last time i've try to upshift manually to 3rd gear at speed below 30km/h & the gear wont upshift. Tried it again at speed just above 30km/h, the gear upshift without any hesitation. However, this possibly apply to the 4-speed Forte i believe.
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 11:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(g88 @ Feb 20 2013, 10:05 AM)
Its like that. U can DIY, SC won't do for u.....
*
Yupp..it's like that & most( if not all) car's also the same i believe. I've insulated it DIY by the way.. tongue.gif
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 11:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(craxors @ Feb 20 2013, 10:56 AM)
meaning...anything beyond that..is abnormal?
*
Sorry..i cant get what u mean..beyond what is abnormal?

This post has been edited by izputra: Feb 20 2013, 11:20 AM
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 11:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(brainz07 @ Feb 20 2013, 11:19 AM)
Ohh...new information to me..as I'm using 6-speed, I monitor it just above 2k rpm can change for every gear but very2 low torque laa...
*
Yupp..that's for sure for NA engine..low torque at low rpm, unless we drive a turbo car tongue.gif
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 11:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(siewstl @ Feb 20 2013, 11:31 AM)
As for the meter 30km & 50 km no light (indicator no light) .i feel it is really funny meter. I do not know the actual purpose ?
*
Actually got light bro..but in dim red, not in bright white. It's a small matter only bro..just enjoy your car biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by izputra: Feb 20 2013, 12:00 PM
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 11:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(siewstl @ Feb 20 2013, 11:31 AM)
Can advise how to do DIY on air cond , any details ?
*
This step by step guide might helps (read the PDF file attached below). I did mine using this well written guide. Credits to the author of this guide..i forgot who already doh.gif . 2 years already maa
Attached File  Forte_Air_Con_Insulation.pdf ( 460.8k ) Number of downloads: 215

izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 04:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(siewstl @ Feb 20 2013, 01:29 PM)
Dump up for the details info. Very helpful.
By the way how you feel the aircond after the wrap ? No more hot air when you off the aircon and switch to outside air (outside air are cool, but the air enter into the cabin is hot  currently)  before wrap  ?
*
The outside air entering the cabin is purposely being heated along the way it goes from outside into the cabin (outdoor air intake mode-green light). Forte is designed to be used in the 4 season countries..so in winter season, the hot air coming into the cabin is so much desirable. But in our hot climax, it's simply annoying (the purposely heated fresh air) sweat.gif In this case, the hot outdoor air entering the cabin got nothing to do with the pipe insulation AFAIK.

I can feel that the cabin cools down a bit faster after the wrap. That's from my own observation. I permanently set the air circulation mode to internal circulation only by the way (amber light)

This post has been edited by izputra: Feb 20 2013, 05:36 PM
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 04:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(svixth @ Feb 20 2013, 03:58 PM)
Where can we purchase the insulator? How much does it cost?
*
Any home aircond shop sold this insulator..it is exactly the same insulator used for home aircond. Price just several ringgit only..buy 2 pieces will do..not more than RM10 wink.gif
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 05:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(siewstl @ Feb 20 2013, 05:22 PM)
Just curious, why many Fortezen like to mod their stock car, is it will be more expensive to do that ?
The car is worth for money, if mod here & there, the car will consider expensive. then straight away buy more expensive car. Any comment ??
*
To each his own bro..their money their right..hehe tongue.gif
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 09:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(kailord @ Feb 20 2013, 09:20 PM)
If the price of K3 really shoots up to the 90 - 100k bracket, I think the old forte rv won't suffer much.
*
Yaa..i speculate that the 1.6SX K3 will cost no less than 90k & the 2.0SX will be no less than 105k. If the K3 pricing regime is still the same with the current Forte, i will be in deep shock actually. & if my speculation is true, i agree with u that our current Forte second hand price wont suffer much
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 11:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(bennedict82 @ Feb 20 2013, 10:45 PM)
The K3 will be at least 90-95K. Or no one will buy RIO.
*
That's why i speculate higher price for the K3. I dont think the same pricing regime will be applied to the K3.
izputra
post Feb 20 2013, 11:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(keagan @ Feb 20 2013, 10:18 PM)
you're right,

they will be using the existing 1.6 unit with some tweaks namely the Gamma engine with the 1.8 Nu unit from the elantra... somehow they have phased out the Theta II (in my opinion is a crappy engine for a 2.0 N/A) so it might be a good thing..
*
If that's the case though, i still believe that the K3 price will be on the higher side than the current Forte. Anyway..we will know it sooner or later...

P/s : if Forte 2.0 theta II NA engine is crappy, i believe the same engine used in mitsubishi lancer GT is also crappy in your opinion right?

This post has been edited by izputra: Feb 20 2013, 11:35 PM
izputra
post Feb 21 2013, 12:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(keagan @ Feb 21 2013, 08:36 AM)
can't compare bro, the only similarity of the THETA II and lancer's engine is the block itself, whatever that's inside is another story on its own, pistons, etc. the performance of the 2.0 is a really weak one altogether (power comes in late at 3k rpm onwards as anything below that feels rather flat)..other factors come into play too, the gbox, the ECU etc... what i can say is the 2.0 needs more boost on the low end
*

Hmm..i'm not sure u compare it with what car..but i drove the Civic 2.0, Lancer GT 2.0 before & oh ya..a Sylphy, all i can say is those car's pick up are more or less the same. Civic 2.0 got the best acceleration from my observation. Lancer GT is the slowest (in acceleration) however (Sorry Lancer owners..it's just my own observation only). So, to say Forte 2.0 engine is weaker than others is not a clear statement i believe. Anyway, if we are looking at the higher low end torque/power, the supercharge/turbocharge/twincharge cars are the way to go tongue.gif

This post has been edited by izputra: Feb 21 2013, 12:27 PM
izputra
post Feb 21 2013, 12:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(keagan @ Feb 21 2013, 08:52 AM)
6 speeds should have good RV...i'm just worried about the 4 speeders... lol, i'm the last batch owner and my car is a year end car summore  sweat.gif
*
biggrin.gif

My 4 speeder is CBU..hopefully able to fetch good RV rolleyes.gif
izputra
post Feb 21 2013, 03:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(rainsplit @ Feb 21 2013, 03:05 PM)
So bro, does this means the 1.6 6 speed has same low end torque with 2.0?
*
NA engine usually comes with this kind of characteristics. Go for supercharge/twincharge cars if want higher low end torque.
izputra
post Feb 21 2013, 04:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(keagan @ Feb 21 2013, 03:55 PM)
Not necessarily Bro,  the lumps from T and H are quicker to go even for their 1.8 units. Don't know it's due to the rims or the heavier weight,  whatever it is not much can be done as this is the way it has been tuned.
*
Yupp..agree with u regarding the rims & weight argument. I also believe that gear ratios also play its role here in order to get quicker pick up pace..though for Lancer & Sylphy, the term 'gear ratios' might not applicable...

This post has been edited by izputra: Feb 21 2013, 04:16 PM
izputra
post Feb 21 2013, 04:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(keagan @ Feb 21 2013, 03:59 PM)
I did speak to other 2.0 owners before, we are quite aware of what our engine is capable of.  Probably its just the way it's tuned.  I really don't know,  I was just thinking about the other 1.8 units.  Not even the 2.0 really.  But yeah for low end torque like you said,  forced induction is the best still.
*
FORCED INDUCTION..that's the exact term that i look for.. thumbup.gif
izputra
post Feb 21 2013, 04:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(g88 @ Feb 21 2013, 04:04 PM)
haha i knew you still sure step in and kantoi  biggrin.gif ..sure 2.0 is STRONGER la...$$ also pay more, not to mention FC and Roadtax tongue.gif

Not replacement for displacement.

1.6 consider no bad la with nowdays CCVT DOHC technology
*
Force induction = replacement for displacement? no?... tongue.gif

5 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0496sec    0.51    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 09:41 AM