What's the difference between epf and kwap?
This post has been edited by Ramjade: May 19 2015, 11:49 AM
EPF DIVIDEND, EPF
EPF DIVIDEND, EPF
|
|
May 19 2015, 11:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
What's the difference between epf and kwap?
This post has been edited by Ramjade: May 19 2015, 11:49 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 01:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
I thought epf answer to some kind of watch dog?
|
|
|
Jun 11 2015, 01:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 19 2015, 10:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(Hansel @ Oct 19 2015, 10:28 AM) I don't get it,... like I said, if more people withdraw out upon retirement age, then we, the contributors will get less dividend. So, why encourage more people to withdraw ? Don't listen to him. He's like unker xxx who is anti-goverment. His goal is withdraw epf, so that you don't give the goverment money. |
|
|
Oct 19 2015, 12:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
supersound you tell me you rather give money to insurance company or put inside epf (to claim income tax)?
|
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 08:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(MGM @ Oct 21 2015, 08:01 AM) EPF to pay 2.5% dividend under amended EPF Act So 2.5% is the minimum? Before this how much was the minimum?http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2015...vidend-EPF-Act/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 08:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 08:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(prophetjul @ Oct 21 2015, 08:37 AM) It's all about Syariah. If you choose not to be under this scheme, then you do not partake in the performance of the Fund. Then their obligation is only 2.5% as far as they are concerned. I don't think that is true. Both also will be given NO LESS THAN 2.5% (from what I read, I understand that both will be minimum 2.5%). Could be wrong here.Meaning everyone irrespective of race and religion is FORCED to accept Islamic principles. This is Malaysian fair and equitable principles. |
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 08:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(prophetjul @ Oct 21 2015, 08:41 AM) Then what is this?QUOTE The Bill also states that the EPF may have the power to declare a dividend of not less than 2.5% per annum for those whose elections have not taken effect. It meant even those who didn't make the change, EPF can give dividend of min 2.5%. So is not restricted to those who switch. |
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 09:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
cherroy so what does the new statement meant?
|
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 09:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Oct 21 2015, 09:10 AM) The sentence was more due to shariah principle, or islamic banking principal, they cannot have fixed "interest", but based on profit sharing principal. So is change in name/principles ? Nothing major on the dividends right?Just like conventional FD vs islamic deposit. They can't put minimum fixed return/interest in islamic product. Correct me if I am wrong. |
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 09:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(MGM @ Oct 21 2015, 09:31 AM) If implemented an EPF account holder need to choose to stay in conventional account or change to the new KWSP-i. These 2 accounts would have 2 diff dividend rate of at least 2.5%. Correct? I think is to address the concern that epf investment are not Syariah compliance. So some may see the money as "haram" So for those who choose Syariah, I am sure epf investment will be Syariah compliance while those who choose conventional account, need not have Syariah compliance. But both will still achieved the same amount of dividends.http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysi...ccount-says-epf |
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 10:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(prophetjul @ Oct 21 2015, 10:31 AM) Since in the EPF Act, they already have the power why is it new? Cause Islamic banking stuff cannot have interest/dividend term in it. So come up with another name call profit sharing rate.The report does not say that those who elect NOT follow the Syariah principles would get their dividends according to the performance of the fund. Or is that taken as it is? Are there going to be two funds? I am guessing one will be Syariah compliance, one does not need to. But returns will be the same. Is just amendments to the act to introduce Islamic account. That's all. After what cherroy wrote, that's just what happen |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 11:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(vincentwmh @ Oct 21 2015, 10:49 AM) just robbing our money to fund I business/product. this is DAY-LIGHT ROBBERY, the bait is only 2.5% dividen if u opt NOT to McFD2R Geez. Don't be so negative about Islamic product. Did you know that maybank Islamic efd 1 month beats all normal efd by margin of 0.1%? Conventional efd is 3.15% while the Islamic efd is 3.25%.Islamic product is not always bad. Is just different name for same concept.next year, those opt in syariah gets 7.8% while conventional gets 2.8% You are forgetting that the other act said conventional epf still can give minimum of 2.5% same with the new act which said Islamic epf also give minimum 2.5% This post has been edited by Ramjade: Oct 21 2015, 11:23 AM |
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 11:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 01:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(fatw3apon @ Oct 21 2015, 01:00 PM) Why do people hate EPF so much when they have been giving high dividend for so long. I will answer your question with the following question.Anyway I am going to ask a valid question, do you think conventional or syariah portfolio will give more dividends? 1. Do you trust the one who handle epf? 2. Why is epf always being pick on for you know what? Anyway, I am STILL OK with epf as long as no news appear that one cannot withdraw. But I wouldn't dump everything into it. As Unker dreamer said: diversify! I reckoned same dividend. Name only different. If they give different, sure cause an uproar. |
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 02:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Oct 21 2015, 02:13 PM) The amendment doesn't state you can't withdraw after 55, even one opt to KWSP-i, so don't need pre-judge on anything that is not occuring. If EPF intend to hang on the money, they can impose higher age withdrawal, or emulate what is done by CPF. QUOTE "Apart from that, the Bill also seeks to introduce a new section to provide that any contribution that has been credited into the account of a member after he or she has attained the age of 55 may only be withdrawn when the member turns 60." But they said can only withdraw after 60 if one were to put money in after 55. Am I missing something? Why double standards? Any money deposited before 55 can be withdraw but any money deposited after 55 years old cannot be removed? What did CPF do? |
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 06:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
Hansel you are wrong there. If you are below 55 and all your life you have been contributing to epf, you can withdraw all/partial when you hit 55 years old.
That rule only apply if you decide to add money into epf after you are 55. If you don't add money inside but just withdrawing the money, you are allowed to withdraw. Only if you add in money then you have to wait until you reach 60 years old to withdraw. |
|
|
Oct 21 2015, 08:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(Hansel @ Oct 21 2015, 06:17 PM) You read wrongly and misinterpreted my posting wrongly,... I said if you have any sen left inside the account when you touch 55yo, it will be locked inside ill you are 60yo. In other words, if you apply to withdraw any amount by 55yo, you can OF COURSE WITHDRAW when you touch 55yo. You may still have 'leftover' inside the account after this 55yo withdrawal. Hansel, from what I read, if you do not topup, you can withdraw anytime. If you topup at the age of 55 or more, you can only withdraw at 60. So the choice is yours. Topup and give away your rights to withdraw or don't topup and have the flexibility to withdraw anytime.As for withdrawing any amount 'leftover' beyond 55yo, they are silent on this. As for adding money into EPF after 55yo, you are not allowed to withdraw till you are 60yo. Please read the grammar carefully,... and carry with you a tinge of legal conceptions with it. Anyway, it haven't been pass yet. Still being debated. For now, the old rules still apply. |
|
|
Oct 22 2015, 10:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
24,392 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(prophetjul @ Oct 22 2015, 10:21 AM) i suggest that as with ASB and others, in Malaysia the only way this is going to work is to differentiate the two funds completely. I think if the investment is not haram, (alcohol, gambling), even if not Syariah compliance, is still OK.i have another question: Is it halal for Muslims to be handling non Syariah products? |
| Change to: | 0.3154sec
0.70
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 08:25 PM |