QUOTE(magika @ Jul 12 2025, 11:49 PM)
What aggressive ? What asset allocation ? Do we need to conform to what financial gurus said ? All of us accumulate our assets based on our skills and prudence. So after accomplishing all due to our own capability we must now listen to textbook gurus ?
Epf is fully goverment guaranteed upto their minimum dividend. If that is not safe enough then can say no more. If government failed then all banks will failed too. All the Malaysian brokerages n properties won't be able to survive also.
All said, not all my liquidity is with epf and it's all because of 100k limitation. Remove it and I would sent it all in.
You don't think putting practically 100% of your wealth into EPF is actually aggressive?
That is the general definition of putting all of one's eggs into a single asset... and is generally considered risky and aggressive.
same thing if we choose another asset class like gold or bitcoin or pure cash in ringgit papers. if everything is in just one thing... it is too aggressive a asset allocation.
But really, I am not here to judge... I just stated what is conventional knowledge. Nothing wrong with going against conventional wisdom, if you are fully aware of your choice.
Out of curiosity, how old are you (age bracket will do)? cos the same advice cannot be given to someone who is like 20 years old... just saying.
(I guess the older one is, maybe can all in into EPF as it does provide a lot more benefit and protections and some estate distribution features)
Like for my case, I like EPF as much as the next joe (I've stated this many times in this thread), but even so, the highest allocation ever in EPF was maybe 40% when I was working. now, it is like low teens... maybe cos of my age and hence the allocation.
This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Jul 13 2025, 12:06 AM