Budget around 150k. Owners of one of the car comment will be much appreciated
Subaru XV VS Mazda CX5
Subaru XV VS Mazda CX5
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 01:50 PM, updated 13y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
|
Moderator
12,176 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
which is more powerful? My parents plan to buy a "big" yet stylish SUV. They care about how powerful are they in real life because this car will be using in my hometown Sabah. Where road doesn't like KL, they have big holes and cracking road. Really awful
Budget around 150k. Owners of one of the car comment will be much appreciated |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 01:54 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
QUOTE(Xirality @ Feb 15 2013, 01:50 PM) which is more powerful? My parents plan to buy a "big" yet stylish SUV. They care about how powerful are they in real life because this car will be using in my hometown Sabah. Where road doesn't like KL, they have big holes and cracking road. Really awful you mentioned POWER is a high requirement. Budget around 150k. Owners of one of the car comment will be much appreciated your choice is obvious as one of the cars u mentioned above is known to be under powered |
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 01:59 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
|
Moderator
12,176 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 02:01 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,040 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Subaru = power
|
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 02:30 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
For Sabah road. Better buy pajero sport. Tougher & bigger.
Subaru XV and Mazda CX5 just an urban suv. If just using in KK, ok la.. |
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 02:34 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,963 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: KL |
QUOTE(Xirality @ Feb 15 2013, 01:50 PM) which is more powerful? My parents plan to buy a "big" yet stylish SUV. They care about how powerful are they in real life because this car will be using in my hometown Sabah. Where road doesn't like KL, they have big holes and cracking road. Really awful I thought TOYOTA is the best SUV and/or 4WD cars?Budget around 150k. Owners of one of the car comment will be much appreciated |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 02:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
958 posts Joined: Feb 2008 |
Go for Subaru. Tahan lasak
|
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 02:41 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
I am not the one saying Subaru XV and Mazda XV as urban suv.
But Subaru and Mazda said that in their advertisement and their marketing strategy. In their manual also said like that it's urban suv not mean for challenging off-road. Subaru XV CVT will not stand tough road in Sabah. |
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 02:47 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 02:52 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
QUOTE(durianpuff @ Feb 15 2013, 02:47 PM) CX-5 better if 4WD version.But as urban suv, It didnt have Low gear or high gear 4WD that u can choose which usually can found in Toyota or Mitsubishi or automated setting that U can find in land rover as example. Somemore U need smaller rims wt bigger tyre if U plan to drive in Sabah. 19" or 17" rims for CX5 is too big. This post has been edited by khusyairi: Feb 15 2013, 02:57 PM |
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 02:55 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
178 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
actually, I am very curious as to the concept of x-over. I mean, those who bought, are buying or eyeing an x-over, what attract you to go for x-over.
It's a cross breed of SUV and a HatchBack. However, it compromise the road handling of a HB (being taller), and also lack the offroad capability of a SUV (most are 2-wheels or AWD, no 4wD option). Dun get me wrong, I am not making a critic statement but rather a curious mind want to know. This post has been edited by swing123: Feb 15 2013, 02:58 PM |
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 03:07 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
QUOTE(swing123 @ Feb 15 2013, 02:55 PM) actually, I am very curious as to the concept of x-over. I mean, those who bought, are buying or eyeing an x-over, what attract you to go for x-over. This picture is the reason why these cars are popular at certain placesIt's a cross breed of SUV and a HatchBack. However, it compromise the road handling of a HB (being taller), and also lack the offroad capability of a SUV (most are 2-wheels or AWD, no 4wD option). Dun get me wrong, I am not making a critic statement but rather a curious mind want to know. They aren't exactly off-road, but just very very poor road conditions. driving a normal car would make you cry. ![]() |
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 05:07 PM
|
|
Moderator
12,176 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
QUOTE(durianpuff @ Feb 15 2013, 03:07 PM) This picture is the reason why these cars are popular at certain places true! I hate when drive my City on this kind of road They aren't exactly off-road, but just very very poor road conditions. driving a normal car would make you cry. ![]() but yet there are people still buy 350z, RX8, Camry etc Note that I stay in Tawau, not capital city like Kota Kinabalu. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 05:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
Come on, the tests in that video aren't that challenging, are they? I'm quite certain my Kangoo could do most of them too, and the Kangoo 4x4 could do basically all of em (except maybe for one test, afraid it'll topple over).
Do this with an XV and I'll be impressed: Anyway, Citroen C5? Press a button and the car will lift up, letting you cross this kind of terrain. |
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 05:43 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
QUOTE(kadajawi @ Feb 15 2013, 05:41 PM) Come on, the tests in that video aren't that challenging, are they? I'm quite certain my Kangoo could do most of them too, and the Kangoo 4x4 could do basically all of em (except maybe for one test, afraid it'll topple over). eh guys... we are getting carried away.Do this with an XV and I'll be impressed: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Anyway, Citroen C5? Press a button and the car will lift up, letting you cross this kind of terrain. TS said he wanted a big, stylish and powerful SUV, not an offroad vehicle. sabah road is bad, but they are still roads (albeit horrible) la aiyoyo |
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 05:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
Haha, I'm just against calling the XV more than just an urban SUV.
|
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 08:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
481 posts Joined: Jun 2010 |
Stylish not necessarily be able to work in off road conditions. U could buy a used X5 or Land Rover. But new ones i would not look at the Subaru or Mazda really. Since in your place, u should realize that sometimes driving what a lot of other people drive there makes more sense than buying something that does not work. Not necessarily mean u should own a Hilux (Which i know a lot of that there). But being true off road SUV like Land Rovers, Pajero or even a Land Cruiser.
|
|
|
Feb 15 2013, 09:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Soleanna |
if the roads are as bad as you say , you`re better of with the hilux...
|
|
|
Feb 16 2013, 11:04 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Dec 2012 |
cx-5 more urban car
xv can go offroad a bit I'd suggest get something like fortuner or xtrail instead. |
|
|
Feb 16 2013, 12:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
459 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
Personnel preference would go for cx5 instead of xv.
Outlook - cx5 Features - cx5 gadgets and bose sound system Performance - cx5 skyactive engine win over the fuel consumption |
|
|
Feb 16 2013, 12:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
459 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
Personnel preference would go for cx5 instead of xv.
Outlook - cx5 Features - cx5 gadgets and bose sound system Performance - cx5 skyactive engine win over the fuel consumption |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 02:16 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
178 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(durianpuff @ Feb 15 2013, 03:07 PM) This picture is the reason why these cars are popular at certain places i see....again, pardon my ignorance, isn't cross-over built on a sedan chasis which mean low clearance, also are they using stiffer suspension like the one in a true SUV? how would the cross-over help in navigating pothole roads in the photo?They aren't exactly off-road, but just very very poor road conditions. driving a normal car would make you cry. ![]() |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 02:26 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
QUOTE(swing123 @ Feb 20 2013, 02:16 PM) i see....again, pardon my ignorance, isn't cross-over built on a sedan chasis which mean low clearance, also are they using stiffer suspension like the one in a true SUV? how would the cross-over help in navigating pothole roads in the photo? not ignorance la. Just you never driven in such conditions before.2 most important thing about cross-overs VS normal sedan cars: 1. 4-wheel drive (and traction control) is very important. If you drive in mud roads then you will know 2-wheel's disadvantage. I kena both front wheels stuck in mud last time when drive in kampung during rain. the 2 rear wheels just sit there staring at you and ask "apa lu mau?" 2. also another strong point of cross-over is the higher ground clearance than normal sedans. so not easy to hit the undercarriage of car in potholes or poor roads. not forgetting a higher profile allows driver to navigate and see better ahead on road conditions. There is a huge market for cross-overs simply because true off-roaders usually lack the luxury and comfort, and true off-roaders are meant for...as the name implies, off-road (like jungle trekking, mount climb, etc) cross-overs are usually inexpensive in comparison and has the benefits of both worlds. This post has been edited by durianpuff: Feb 20 2013, 02:32 PM |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 03:09 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
178 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(durianpuff @ Feb 20 2013, 02:26 PM) not ignorance la. Just you never driven in such conditions before. I think that is my "igorant" points. There are quite a few "soft-roader SUV" options available in the market. So, why not those soft-SUVs if that is the case. A cross-over does not have the best of both sedan/SUV but instead it has the reverse (half empty POV, lol).2 most important thing about cross-overs VS normal sedan cars: 1. 4-wheel drive (and traction control) is very important. If you drive in mud roads then you will know 2-wheel's disadvantage. I kena both front wheels stuck in mud last time when drive in kampung during rain. the 2 rear wheels just sit there staring at you and ask "apa lu mau?" 2. also another strong point of cross-over is the higher ground clearance than normal sedans. so not easy to hit the undercarriage of car in potholes or poor roads. not forgetting a higher profile allows driver to navigate and see better ahead on road conditions. There is a huge market for cross-overs simply because true off-roaders usually lack the luxury and comfort, and true off-roaders are meant for...as the name implies, off-road (like jungle trekking, mount climb, etc) cross-overs are usually inexpensive in comparison and has the benefits of both worlds. |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 03:15 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
QUOTE(swing123 @ Feb 20 2013, 03:09 PM) I think that is my "igorant" points. There are quite a few "soft-roader SUV" options available in the market. So, why not those soft-SUVs if that is the case. A cross-over does not have the best of both sedan/SUV but instead it has the reverse (half empty POV, lol). There's a market for everyone. I rather have more choices, than be limited. |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 03:21 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
178 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(durianpuff @ Feb 20 2013, 03:15 PM) this I agreed as i said in my first post, I am not meant to be a critic but rather want to find out what's "the" selling point of cross-over compare to SUV or sedan. Well, as you well said, there is market for everyone |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 03:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
932 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(durianpuff @ Feb 20 2013, 03:15 PM) Check out Ssangyong Aryton....it's a pretty impressive 2.0 Diesel SUV with AWD. And it only costs less than rm130k. Cheapest AWD SUV diesel.The torque (360nm) is not a laughing matter and will put to shame those highway warriors. |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 03:29 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
QUOTE(swing123 @ Feb 20 2013, 03:21 PM) this I agreed it is like mobile phones. it slowly becoming a cross-over between a phone and a computer now as i said in my first post, I am not meant to be a critic but rather want to find out what's "the" selling point of cross-over compare to SUV or sedan. Well, as you well said, there is market for everyone to say it is bad, there are cons. but the pros far outweight the cons. |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 03:33 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
178 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(durianpuff @ Feb 20 2013, 03:29 PM) it is like mobile phones. it slowly becoming a cross-over between a phone and a computer now smart phone different story, no matter what innovative features they can pack it in, they are always handicapped by the battery technology, which the last commercially-viable breakthrough was Lithion and that was like donkey years ago. Until the day they can pack nuclear to power all electronic device, we can then have a glowing phone to say it is bad, there are cons. but the pros far outweight the cons. |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 03:58 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
Why buy crossover?
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/car-models/c...ver-vehicle.htm Crossover benefits? http://auto.howstuffworks.com/car-models/c...cles.htm#page=0 |
|
|
Sep 30 2013, 08:10 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
225 posts Joined: May 2013 |
Just test drove both xv and cx 5 over the weekend and am seriously considering buying the xv. Cx5 handling and engine was surprisingly bad... I really wanted the cx 5 before the test drive but not anymore...
However, I've still got one last issue with it. Is subaru's general maintenance and service more expensive than say, the crv, cx5 and also the asx? Do I have to wait very long for parts if I ever had to change the side mirrors or the bumper if I had an accident with the car? Thanks guys! |
|
|
Sep 30 2013, 03:59 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(Maxiii @ Sep 30 2013, 08:10 AM) Just test drove both xv and cx 5 over the weekend and am seriously considering buying the xv. Cx5 handling and engine was surprisingly bad... I really wanted the cx 5 before the test drive but not anymore... when wan to place booking? However, I've still got one last issue with it. Is subaru's general maintenance and service more expensive than say, the crv, cx5 and also the asx? Do I have to wait very long for parts if I ever had to change the side mirrors or the bumper if I had an accident with the car? Thanks guys! |
|
|
Oct 8 2013, 04:37 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
something to share CX5 AWD vs Forester AWD
*make sure watch it till the end , TQ |
|
|
Oct 8 2013, 05:00 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
210 posts Joined: Aug 2013 From: Kuala Lumpurr |
forester is much more expensive n powerful compared to cx5
|
|
|
Oct 8 2013, 05:47 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
225 posts Joined: May 2013 |
QUOTE(gunh @ Feb 16 2013, 12:39 PM) Personnel preference would go for cx5 instead of xv. hmm... im interested to know about the fuel consumption comparison between cx5 and xv. as i wasnt able to test it during the short test drive... Any thoughts from any one?!!Outlook - cx5 Features - cx5 gadgets and bose sound system Performance - cx5 skyactive engine win over the fuel consumption im still quite undecided!! i use to love the cx5 and watch in amazement whenever i see it on the road. it is such a handsome looking car. However.. all of that went to dust after i test drove the cx5.. xv felt so much planted on the ground and especially at high speed, it is super stead... engine and gear change felt a lot more smooth when i step on the accelerator as compared to the cx5 who just ROAARRR whenever you need to pick up speed. so now my dilemma is whether to sacrifice slightly on the handling and engine and gear responsiveness and get a more popular brand of cx5.. or go for the great handling of subaru and sacrifice on the second hand value and less popular brand.. |
|
|
Oct 8 2013, 06:50 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(Maxiii @ Oct 8 2013, 05:47 PM) hmm... im interested to know about the fuel consumption comparison between cx5 and xv. as i wasnt able to test it during the short test drive... Any thoughts from any one?!! I guess at the end of the day it depends on how you use your car and how you like to drive.im still quite undecided!! i use to love the cx5 and watch in amazement whenever i see it on the road. it is such a handsome looking car. However.. all of that went to dust after i test drove the cx5.. xv felt so much planted on the ground and especially at high speed, it is super stead... engine and gear change felt a lot more smooth when i step on the accelerator as compared to the cx5 who just ROAARRR whenever you need to pick up speed. so now my dilemma is whether to sacrifice slightly on the handling and engine and gear responsiveness and get a more popular brand of cx5.. or go for the great handling of subaru and sacrifice on the second hand value and less popular brand.. I would say CX-5 is actually more comfortable, whereas the XV gives you a better drive. If you spend more time in slow moving traffic, I would say CX-5 sounds better and have a good probability of maintaining resale value compared to XV. But if you like driving around and usually drive in a spirited manner, XV is quite good provided you are willing to sacrifice on resale value, some boot space and CVT noise. |
|
|
Oct 8 2013, 07:06 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(Maxiii @ Oct 8 2013, 05:47 PM) hmm... im interested to know about the fuel consumption comparison between cx5 and xv. as i wasnt able to test it during the short test drive... Any thoughts from any one?!! For FC u can refer to the Asia auto fuel efficiency awards 2012 and 2013 under compact SUV ~ XV is perform 7L/100km get 2nd place is same with land rover freelander 2.2diesel ~ im still quite undecided!! i use to love the cx5 and watch in amazement whenever i see it on the road. it is such a handsome looking car. However.. all of that went to dust after i test drove the cx5.. xv felt so much planted on the ground and especially at high speed, it is super stead... engine and gear change felt a lot more smooth when i step on the accelerator as compared to the cx5 who just ROAARRR whenever you need to pick up speed. so now my dilemma is whether to sacrifice slightly on the handling and engine and gear responsiveness and get a more popular brand of cx5.. or go for the great handling of subaru and sacrifice on the second hand value and less popular brand.. If taken cx5 to compare, dun forget to compare the AWD system with 2WD that selling almost same price ~ ans also the rear suspension that cX 5 is using multi link and XV is using double wish bone ~ do some compare on that |
|
|
Oct 9 2013, 09:37 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
210 posts Joined: Aug 2013 From: Kuala Lumpurr |
there are too many cx5 on the road right now. XV is a looker, if u drive it u'll become popular around your neighbourhood
|
|
|
Oct 9 2013, 10:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,222 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(Xirality @ Feb 15 2013, 02:50 PM) which is more powerful? My parents plan to buy a "big" yet stylish SUV. They care about how powerful are they in real life because this car will be using in my hometown Sabah. Where road doesn't like KL, they have big holes and cracking road. Really awful If you're looking for a big and stylish SUV, the Hyundai Santa Fe 2013 comes to mind.Budget around 150k. Owners of one of the car comment will be much appreciated |
|
|
Oct 9 2013, 12:13 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
225 posts Joined: May 2013 |
QUOTE(romuluz777 @ Oct 9 2013, 10:50 AM) it definitely looks stylish! Has anyone test drove it already? But to be frank.. both sportage and santa fe are not on my list of consideration at all.. Its still between cx5 or xv!! |
|
|
Oct 9 2013, 03:17 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
210 posts Joined: Aug 2013 From: Kuala Lumpurr |
Both are good. CX5 was named as candidates in European Car of The Year 2012 while XV as candidates in European Car of The Year 2013
|
|
|
Oct 9 2013, 09:11 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2013, 09:13 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(Maxiii @ Oct 9 2013, 12:13 PM) it definitely looks stylish! Has anyone test drove it already? bro interested of XV? Better do consideration fast o ~ cos discount maybe until end of this year only~ interested of orange color XV? But to be frank.. both sportage and santa fe are not on my list of consideration at all.. Its still between cx5 or xv!! |
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 08:51 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
210 posts Joined: Aug 2013 From: Kuala Lumpurr |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 11:31 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(zenockl85 @ Oct 9 2013, 09:13 PM) bro interested of XV? Better do consideration fast o ~ cos discount maybe until end of this year only~ interested of orange color XV? Come and look for me for a test drive Sean 013 283 2635 in mean time you see my post https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=ST&f...0#entry63762314 |
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 11:36 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(pai3355 @ Oct 9 2013, 03:17 PM) Both are good. CX5 was named as candidates in European Car of The Year 2012 while XV as candidates in European Car of The Year 2013 Come and look for me for a test drive biggrin.gif laugh.gif Sean 013 283 2635 in mean time you see my post https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=ST&f...0#entry63762314 |
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 12:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,099 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur |
XV is AWD all time
CX5, you would have a choice of 2WD But, i personally feel SUV, AWD is good to have...based on the weight |
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 02:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,567 posts Joined: Jul 2011 From: Grand Ol' Lady |
isnt there like an old pajero or smtg similar?
those like 30years already to date still most hard and tahan lasak and comfy one. i prefer those |
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 03:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,099 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(christ14 @ Oct 10 2013, 02:46 PM) isnt there like an old pajero or smtg similar? those are meant for long lasting.....older built are lasting...to be frankthose like 30years already to date still most hard and tahan lasak and comfy one. i prefer those Modern SUV perhaps good for normal road use only...does not able to cope off road... |
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 03:28 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 03:30 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 03:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
574 posts Joined: Jun 2010 |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 04:05 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(markypcs @ Oct 10 2013, 03:34 PM) http://youtu.be/FOmZIu_y1jsSee the differn of AWD in different brands~ http://youtu.be/P21lwEYY-D0 After u see this video u can imagine that what will happen of only 2WD car. After u see this 2 video still not understand then can direct ask me~ |
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 07:36 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2013, 09:55 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
225 posts Joined: May 2013 |
QUOTE(SerbaSerbi @ Oct 10 2013, 06:55 PM) wow! good one! i wouldnt mind buying both! one for my wife and one for myself haha!How is the maintenance cost like for both the cars? Have you managed to bring them for the first few services..? |
|
|
Oct 11 2013, 03:54 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2013, 11:34 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
20 posts Joined: Dec 2012 |
SUBARU XV is better in handling&power, fuel saver, safety
Mazda CX5 is more stylish, feature and spec, new technology test drive both, you will know which to choose. |
|
|
Oct 11 2013, 12:15 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2013, 06:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
574 posts Joined: Jun 2010 |
Since Subaru XV has superb handling, wouldn't that mean a stiffer suspension = bumpy drive?
|
|
|
Oct 11 2013, 07:02 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
20 posts Joined: Dec 2012 |
QUOTE(markypcs @ Oct 11 2013, 06:08 PM) i only mention ''better'' handling comparison with CX5, superb handling is belongs to BMWStiffer suspension = bumpy drive belongs to Audi Q3 or Q5 it is not as hard as Q3 or Q5, but if you use to harrier soft soft suspension, yes, you can say it is bumpy. |
|
|
Oct 11 2013, 09:34 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(markypcs @ Oct 11 2013, 06:08 PM) if u have really test drive XV and compare other car , XV is using double wishbone in rear suspension (rear 2 wheel is jump individual ) compare with other brand are using multilink suspension (rear 2wheel is link together) So u can imagine which 1is more bumby~ |
|
|
Oct 13 2013, 09:47 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
210 posts Joined: Aug 2013 From: Kuala Lumpurr |
Saw 1 xv yesterday , I like!
|
|
|
Oct 13 2013, 10:25 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 13 2013, 10:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
76 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(SerbaSerbi @ Oct 13 2013, 12:36 AM) Ok it's my wife's not mine. CBU bought earlier batch when they were promoting it. Waifu like because it looks like a girls SUV. I see, so I presume its the batch with 19 inch rims or did you kena the subsequent rim downgrade? My bro in law has one as well. I think it is the best batch of all the CX-5s so far. |
|
|
Oct 13 2013, 11:52 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
|
|
|
Oct 14 2013, 08:34 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
210 posts Joined: Aug 2013 From: Kuala Lumpurr |
|
|
|
Oct 14 2013, 09:16 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 14 2013, 10:23 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(SerbaSerbi @ Oct 14 2013, 10:14 AM) I think Mazda CX5 can do more spins and more drifting slides and screeches than this noisy blue car. Did Mazda have any even like this?And LOL Think people! The Mazda CX5 would be spinning around the whole shopping mall - and SO SILENTLY too. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Oct 14 2013, 04:01 PM
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
I thought I already closed a topic similar to this.. TS has gone missing for 8 months and topic hijacked by an XV owner dupe and a Subaru salesman.
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0398sec
0.89
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 11:53 AM |