QUOTE(kentchow75 @ Jan 21 2013, 12:00 PM)
The issue should be viewed from many different perspective.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
From the side of the teacher, of course they want their student to be creative and come up with something very new and do not copy any other's work even their seniors.
But in this case, many students might face in dilemma on not knowing how to complete their assignments with their limited experience and knowledge.
By doing the work with creativity, it might not reach what the lecture want and in the end, given a very low score for such a 'creative' work.
In my own opinion, I might as well be on the side of encouraging this plagiarism activity.
When people don't know a thing, they may learn it, by mimic to how those who knew the thing.
We learn from copying, and yet after we've learnt all what the senior does, then only come the time we do our work with creativity and invent something new.
In general, Thomas Edison invented light bulb, are we going to not use this light bulb and invent another new item that will emits light by ourselves? Obviously no.
QUOTE
students might face in dilemma on not knowing how to complete their assignments with their limited experience and knowledge.
1. Then
ASK. You have your coursemates, your professors, the teaching assistants, books, the internet.
QUOTE
In my own opinion, I might as well be on the side of encouraging this plagiarism activity.
2. So what's stopping the rest of the class from also copying ? Why should I spend countless hours reading,practicing and thinking if I can just "borrow" from the seniors ?
QUOTE
In general, Thomas Edison invented light bulb
3. In reality, the electric bulb was first invented by Joseph Swan. And Mr Edison was not the last person to invent a light bulb either. Today we have florescent tubes & LED lights to choose from. Something we wouldn't have if everyone thinks copying is a-ok.
This post has been edited by corad: Jan 21 2013, 01:42 PM