he's reporting ur overly large sig

which is why i question whether or not chinese too should be considered as bumi base on the said article.
then wouldnt it be unfair for iban to get bumiputra status if they were indeed originated from china like malaysian chinese?

oh ya kah? bisi gambar kah tulisan turai nyak?

aiyah i was just trying to make a case, without taking into consideration bumiputra benefits.

if u think a sec longer, u would know this is not the issue about nationality but more of bumiputra status and right.

which country in this world that still practices something similar to bumi rights and benefits?

apart from malaysia....

huhue

apuuuuu.. nyamai mai nuan ngangau nama urang beleeiiikkkk nehhhhhhhhh.. ka mintak kena bukut dekkkkkk????

ya kewww? got facts or not??

?

u wot m8?

?

ya kerrrrrr?

Because the topic is about Iban, not Malay.

bisi sepet mimit mata bala kitai iban. engka amai.







garik tradisional bala orang taiwan bisi curak baka pua kumbu kitai iban

urang iban nuan, bakih?

mind to elaborate more on 'cannot unite'?

baru abis ngirup langkau.

my family has a cannon.

Archaeological evidence demonstrates a technological connection between the farming cultures of the south (Southeast Asia and Melanesia) and sites that are first known from mainland China, whereas a combination of archaeological and linguistic evidence has been interpreted as supporting a northern (southern China and Taiwan) origin for the Austronesian language family. In a recent treatment, all Austronesian languages were classified into 10 subfamilies, with all the extra-Formosan languages grouped in one subfamily and with representatives of the remaining 9 known only in Taiwan.[5] It has been argued that these patterns are best explained by dispersal of an agricultural people from Taiwan into insular Southeast Asia, Melanesia, and, ultimately, the remote Pacific. Although this model—termed the “express train to Polynesia”[6][7] – is broadly consistent with available data, concerns have been raised.[8] Alternatives to this model posit an indigenous origin for the Austronesian languages in Melanesia or Southeast Asia

tldr: Migration and dispersion from China/Taiwan. (regarded as one of the theories)

well, i copy pasta from ur link. so, thanks for agreeing with me.

nama utai insap nuan dlm gambar nuan nyak, dom?

the study only refute the claim of mass population replacement to replace the PREEXISTING HUNTING AND GATHERING POPULATIONS BY FARMER VOYAGING IMMIGRANTS FROM TAIWAN.

Not to mention, i copy pasta my original content from wiki itself:
Iban People



Anyway, my real intention of creating this thread in the first place is to question the legitimacy of bumiputra status. Who are we to decide who owned this piece of land? People keep on barking "hey my ancestors lived here first, so i should have special privilege bla bla bla' when the fact that their original ancestors are from Africa. (or if u are practicing abrahimic religions, Adam and Eve)