Looks like all the bravado about filing for JR after CNY has fizzled.
Where have all the smart victims gone to?
Like someone said - most of the logical victims have either left the page or been banned for asking the right Q's. All that remains there are a minimal number of victims who bemusedly enough admit to blindly following a faceless adviser. It's like watching a s-l-o-w train wreck.
Pat Lu (GMS Admin) has reverted to Director fuelled $ to sponsor the page daily to garner the Anti-Barisan crowd and boost the number of likes. A lil like the "paid groupies" the Barisan procure for their ceramahs. Ironic, ain't it?

The following website under JR in the GMS page was unceremoniously deleted by Pat Lu :
http://www.loyarburok.com/2011/09/09/legal...udicial-review/An encapusulation from the said site, "In Malaysia, an application for judicial review is often denied due to ouster clauses. Ouster clauses are finality clauses attempt to completely exclude judicial review. Words such as “final and/or shall not be questioned” are often seen in Acts of Parliament to deem the decision made by the Government be conclusive and does not subject to review. Unfortunately, unlike United Kingdom, we are not prepared to ignore absolute ouster clauses".
Other reasons why the JR seems like having minimal chances of succeeding can be garnered from this Bar Council site :
http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/administrat..._singapore.htmlAmongst many JR impediments from this site are :
1)"it is therefore not surprising to note that to date there is yet a single case in which administrative acts have been impugned by mala fides". Nuff said.
2) It was quoted at the GMS site that the legal fees being bandied is RM200K and they're not even certain of winning. Good money chasing bad? "Most of all, an unsuccessful public interest litigant would be pauperised by costs, a significant strain on financial resources and a deterrence towards undertaking future public interest litigation cases. Further, an unsuccessful public interest litigant who took on public authorities who are protected by the Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 will be required to pay costs taxed on a solicitor-client basis, a serious impediment indeed to any aspiring public interest litigants".
3) Most damning to their JR cause is if GMSB is found to be unsustainable, the AG can step in as a matter of public interest to deter the company from continuin to scam the general public via Relator Action :"The argument is simple, that is, if the rights asserted by the private individuals are public rights, it is the job of Attorney General who is the guardian and protector of public rights to represent public interest. The Attorney General may initiate actions either at his own volition or at the instance of a member of public by way of a relator action".
It is interesting to note that Pat Lu has deleted the JR post after Dee Casey's mention that "up to 100% victim police reports to impress the judge are needed to file the JR". She seems hell-bent in misleading the sheep. Raj Sami's deleted comment then, "If the judge is going to base his judgement on the number of police reports instead of unjust acts, may God Help us all". My reply to Raj Sami would be - may God help you and the other sheep for blindly following a faceless assassin in Dee Casey who is evidently misleading you lot to another very expensive and time consuming mistake.
Someone's gonna take the fall when the number of police reports do not live up to Dee's "up to 100%" expectations. By the past and present posts of their loyal lieutenants, KE,Yeap,Namaste,Maha,P.Young,Catty et al, the consultants and the Protem Comm are set to be scape-goated whilst Dee & Pat Lu continue to stave off (or delete) important Q's on when exactly the JR will be filed.
Keep the few sheep (and the sponsored page anti BN mercenaries) focussed on BN,BNM,Psy,slaps on faces,police reports. But please don't ask us pertinent Q's about the JR, thank you very much.
Dupe. Deceive. Stall. Protect the Directors.
In the meantime, I'm rather enjoying their anti BN posts - being a pro PR laddie myself. That's about all that page is good for these days. Now hand me the kuaci, will ya
This post has been edited by StockInvestor: Feb 15 2013, 06:13 PM