QUOTE(cheeming @ Feb 11 2013, 05:30 PM)
And we need to have a proper plan before executing it. We shouldn't just try for the sake of trying. I do agree we need to have our own R&D but we also need to plan how to build and nurture the pool of local talent .
atreyuangel .. for me its not about crony but just that we need to really have a focus on what we can do best. Sorry for being a bit unaware of the current defense R&D situation in Msia as I am only involved in defense R&D in EU.
Being self sufficient is good but its also important that we could consolidate some of the companies into bigger players to have a critical mass and to prevent overlapping research. I do hope that one day Msia will not rely so much on others to develop our national assets.
btw, only US spend a huge amount of money on military R&D programs. Most of the countries spend less than 10 billion per year on R&D.
hahaha apparently I miss type "In b4 not just about the crony!" as "I not just about the crony!"

I believe all the R&D are closely linked to the government as they are the ones that granted the research grant.
I agree on what you said on building and nurturing the local talent .
but as you can see in Malaysia only some of the local public university other then Stride of the UPNM and that have a participation in R&D
while the private sector are made of the large established GLC company like the Bousted, DRB and etc are the ones that gets highlighted.
Local company like the Metro Koats Technology have a very good product that could be used by ATM, instead the company is almost unheard off to most Malaysian even though their product do received recognition on camouflage technology.
A friend of mine, able to develop a USV from cheaper fiberglass materiel with patented design for smooth high speed turning but there is no interest from the Navy!
The boat name is Jampiras USV"
them seems to be struggling to market their product in Malaysia.
QUOTE(meedoot @ Feb 11 2013, 08:51 PM)
want to ask something..
malaysia punya stride
why the goverment tidak mencoba one project for producing some item that MAF ussualy use it, for an example, training bomb (dunno malaysia already produce it or not), simple project but army ussualy use that item very often for training their new soldier, dont have strategic values, but atleast, army will buy it, factory got the money for next R&D, and can improve it. the point is, there's a will from the goverment and users.
like ANOA in the first launching, TNI wont use that (no match with other vehicles from outside) but our president Habibie in that time insit TNI must buy it (approx 150 ANOA), and now, day by day we can improve it. maybe still have lack in there and here, but atleast we try..
i hope the plan for aqusition pars 8x8 still on the right track and malaysia can start producing their own gears..
salam
Malaysia do develop training dumb bomb for training purposes,
the Stride is still on the final (I believe on final phase) phase with the Taming Sari (Self Propelled Munition)
While CTRM are more in the UAV development industry.
but like I said, local product are very seldom caught the eye of the procurement team of the government.
For example the DRB Deftech AV4 4x4 can still be used as field ambulance or at least by the TD in the country, but they do not have the interest on it.
Maybe there are other factor involved that slash out the AV4, but there are room for improvement.
The AV8 project probably the largest Malaysian R&D project with the Turkish side, a sum of RM8billion is awarded to DRB for the development of the product from the center, development facilities, test track and etc.
And I believe it is a good start.