Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V8, Ops Daulat

views
     
cheeming
post Feb 11 2013, 04:35 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 11 2013, 01:25 PM)
if you could spare about RM50billion annually for R&D then we will see the result fast enough!
*
Actually to be able to support and able to produce our own armament we need not only the money but the manpower(technical know-how).. As far as I know we do not have enough proper people to develop our own technologies.

And we don't need to spend so much like rm 50 billion annually to produce excellent results (there are countries spending not so much on R&D but still be able to produce results). All we need is a proper management of resources and focus on the kind of research objective we want to reach. Besides we do not have a real market over here, so before considering to invest heavily on producing on out own we need to have a forecast and a proper market analysis if we are able to sell it to our own MoD or other countries.. smile.gif
cheeming
post Feb 11 2013, 05:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
And we need to have a proper plan before executing it. We shouldn't just try for the sake of trying. I do agree we need to have our own R&D but we also need to plan how to build and nurture the pool of local talent .

atreyuangel .. for me its not about crony but just that we need to really have a focus on what we can do best. Sorry for being a bit unaware of the current defense R&D situation in Msia as I am only involved in defense R&D in EU.

Being self sufficient is good but its also important that we could consolidate some of the companies into bigger players to have a critical mass and to prevent overlapping research. I do hope that one day Msia will not rely so much on others to develop our national assets.

btw, only US spend a huge amount of money on military R&D programs. Most of the countries spend less than 10 billion per year on R&D.

This post has been edited by cheeming: Feb 11 2013, 05:33 PM
cheeming
post Feb 12 2013, 05:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 11 2013, 10:59 PM)
hahaha apparently I miss type "In b4 not just about the crony!" as "I not just about the crony!" laugh.gif
I believe all the R&D are closely linked to the government as they are the ones that granted the research grant.

I agree on what you said on building and nurturing the local talent .
but as you can see in Malaysia only some of the local public university other then Stride of the UPNM and that have a participation in R&D
while the private sector are made of the large established GLC company like the Bousted, DRB and etc are the ones that gets highlighted.

Local company like the Metro Koats Technology have a very good product that could be used by ATM, instead the company is almost unheard off to most Malaysian even though their product do received recognition on camouflage technology.

A friend of mine, able to develop a USV from cheaper fiberglass materiel with patented design for smooth high speed turning but there is no interest from the Navy!
The boat name is Jampiras USV"
Seems interesting ... R&D is closely linked to the government if we are only aiming for local use but if we are trying to market it elsewhere the private defence contractors will normally have their own funding and also partial grant from the gov. tongue.gif this is what is happening in my company

lets hope that our Malaysia Defence Park in Sungkai could be realised soon enough then I could come back with my company rclxm9.gif


cheeming
post Feb 12 2013, 07:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Feb 12 2013, 07:05 PM)
Yes, lets hope for the best!  smile.gif
btw if your company do comeback, save some jobs for me!  tongue.gif
tongue.gif definitely .. Will you be in LIMA this year? maybe we could meet up and it will be great to meet someone with knowledge with our Msia defence sector..

PS: on a side note this is what I am involved in http://selex-es.com/domains/air/airborne-isr-systems
cheeming
post Feb 12 2013, 07:50 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
yes we have very good sensors and not only that we have a very good EW equipment&library .. we will definitely have a chance to meet up some time soon
cheeming
post Feb 12 2013, 10:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
yes approval is needed form the congress.

anyway converting F5 to UCAV is not feasible as it might cost more that building from scratch and US already has X45 under development .. Europe is also building a demonstrator called the neuron



cheeming
post Mar 3 2013, 05:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i was saddened by the development of things that is happening in sabah.. sad.gif

its time for us to tighten our border and coastal near sabah.. we should be procuring assets to monitor our coastline and the most effective way is to have ATOS as it could monitor a larger area than patrol boats

http://selex-es.com/~/media/Files/S/Selex-...sr-systems/ATOS


coastal radar is good but is not effective for this kind of invasion by small boats ... as their RCS is small ...
cheeming
post Mar 6 2013, 05:07 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
its time to start upgrade our maritime surveillance capabilities .. anyway I hope that we are thinking about new assets for our maritime patrols

http://www.shephardmedia.com/news/digital-...nouncement-mpa/
cheeming
post Apr 3 2013, 02:18 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Apr 2 2013, 07:41 PM)
very interesting..i've read wiki and forums for the active cancellation..mainly it involves about superposition of waves..good thing i still remember my physics lesson..lol 
but defencetalk says it is more achievable to achieve stealth by redesigning the shape of the aircraft into pointy shape..my question is the same as their question..does rafale have create a very fast on-board computer to calculate enemy's radar wave info(amplitude, frequency, incident angle, etc)?  hmm.gif
*
yup they have a RESM suite to detect radar emitters from a distance and by using electronic countermeasures from the aircraft they could confuse enemy radar..
but this could be countered using adaptive radar waveform meaning the frequency and amplitude will always change... therefore there is study in using cognitive method to overcome this kind of radar.... if you create something there will always be another party creating something to counter it whistling.gif

btw some aircraft have this countermeasures too and not only Rafale... but most of them do not disclosed it..


Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0595sec    0.34    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 01:18 AM