QUOTE(tongweng @ Dec 6 2012, 05:25 PM)
umm...seems like i still have a long way to be a photographer
yea, and i read an article on web by ken rockwell. He say nikon 70 -200 is so impressive lol
the gist of it, a lens that has constant aperture like f2.8 will always be more expensive then variable aperture like f3.5-5.6yea, and i read an article on web by ken rockwell. He say nikon 70 -200 is so impressive lol
but also got beza in terms of how many elements (the glass inside) it has, built quality, weather sealing, nano coat etc
example is nikon 24mm 2.8D is around rm1400. but Nikon 24mm F1.4 is RM6k+
confusing at first lah cos alot of info to absorb. give it abit more time then it wouldnt be a problem edi, only problem is the creative side
Dec 6 2012, 05:55 PM

Quote







0.0254sec
0.65
7 queries
GZIP Disabled