QUOTE(KentPhan @ Oct 31 2012, 08:49 AM)
True too - there are many paper works for BNM to go thro'.
Won't you think, BNM owe GM customers an explanation. I fully undertsand it requires more time to release a conclusive statement. But, at least, being
courteous, BNM should sit down with GM customers or requesting them to send in representative, to explain the investigation and the required time frame. The few half page official statements that so far released by BNM were even making public more curious.
Do you know how many kilos gold have been BNM raided? How "big effort" BNM needs to weight the gold? What is the problem of immediately inform public the seized gold and cash. If this is classfied - then, why? It looks like the seized golds are currently under ISA retention.
Let us put aside our feeling of the greedy of GM customers. They are now like ants on the hot plate. So limited message about what is going to do by BNM on Genneva and also their seized golds and cash. They desrve a better treatment by BNM.
(NOTE - "they' here means excluding Pat Lu, Sheereen and other "co-murders" like the one horse riding)
I just read the news by BNM that now they signed MOU with SC for joint regulatory oevrsight. This is the right move although waited so long. This at least can help to minimize their irresponsible officers playing taichi - "ini SC punya hak, jumpa mereka" or "ini BNM jaga punya, pergi cari meraka".
You can't change nation from greedy. But, we can make the relevant authorities do better jobs to prevent scams.
Who made the money these 4 years in genneva and who convinced all these customers to buy into the Genneva scheme ?
Answer :- The company and the Genneva CONsultants
Who should be courteous and have the responsibility to talk to the customers who are in confusion ?
Answer :- The company and the Genneva CONsultants
There is no law against talking about the case even with the investigation proceeding. These people dont care anymore, they got the money already in their accounts. In Singapore, they didnt even turn up for one of the court case (private suit against them).
Sitting Down With Genneva Customers :-
Has GM cooperated by giving a full list of customers and contact number ?
Information From BNM :-
BNM already put this company on the alert list but did people pay any attention to the risks ? This is also exactly what Singapore's MAS did - publish a FAQ.
BNM already put out general information such as the FAQ and also to inform the customers that the liabilities are more than the assets. They also stated that "the returns promised are not funded through gold trading but from the monies invested into such schemes".
Any details to be publically announced require proper checking to ensure that information announced are 200% accurate in order not to jeopardise the case against GM and the directors.
Furthermore it has to go to the Attorney General's office (not BNM) for the legal proceedings. At that time the details will be revealed as the AG office deem fit.
BNM also stated that they have no powers to distribute the assets back to the customers without the court's direction.
Can these people accept the fact ? They cant - this is the problem because they are still being brainwashed by the company and CONsultants. If these people want their money back quickly, they should consider lawsuits against GM and the CONsultants - possibly a better avenue. (gotta check with the lawyers though)
Yes we cannot stop people from being greedy. But greedy people have to learn that there are consequences to being greedy.
BNM is the arm for supervising and controlling financial dealings in the country including deposit taking etc. SC is the arm for supervising licensing for trading. So if companies are to be licensed for gold trading (real gold trading and not these trading with interests and no gold in hand), it should fall under the SC purview.
This post has been edited by terry8: Oct 31 2012, 10:54 PM