I had to use two distinctive colour to make it clearer because you are ignoring my point, you now say it is RWI but yet insinuate that I kept secret, my post only show how silly you are.

1. If that is the law, you go challenge the law, I am not stupid enough to say it should or shouldn't because it is never my choice nor yours.

2. The term moral can be according to individual's ideology just like the example I gave about the duo who posted their sex video online and promote free sex, they claimed that it is their rights and no existing law to prohibit such immoral practice, so who should determine whether it is allowed or not is the relevant authority not you or me.

Somebody saying it is illegal in England, why are you looking for the answer in a private forum in Malaysia? You should ask the bar council or consult a lawyer, the most we can offer is our personal views here in PhD school, so if someone convinced you eating shit will make you clever, you go eat shit?

PS: A public forum can only offer you similar or different opinions, not for you to acquire credible info nor to champion your ego.

Because TS posts on this forum in Malaysia, which I happen to inhabit. He asked for opinions. And so I gave mine. Dare I ask what is yours? Or do I get slapped down again? You accused me of making personal attacks. Well, if I did, I appologize now. I ask that you stop retaliating.

You're right. Looking through so many posts. I missed the fact that this is PhD school. However, looking at the phrasing of TS's original posts. It looked like he was canvassing for opinions. Not a legal opinion from a lawyer, or a moral opinion from clergy.