If test in Malaysia / Bangladesh UK law accept or not?

Which means the recent sexual intercourse video by the two immoral people is allowed unless local law says it is not, what a wonderful world according to individual's standard.

New law is created when the need arise, that is how everything work, just because there isn't such law yet makes it right? The reason there isn't such a law against sex video in this country is because people have not cross the line, exactly the kind of situation in your prefered wonderland.

Our conscience in a multicultural and religion environment forbid it known as understanding, not everything is written in black and white or cast in stone but stupid people are inconsiderate and provoke feelings.

We simply cannot form any conclusion due to subjective arguments from all sides, hence stem cell cloning and such were banned and allowed by the relevant authorities. Similar to gay marriage, abortion... endless debate.

Only the authority can perform DNA test and use it to identify us in criminal investigation, no individual have the rights and it is consider violation if without consent. We first bow to our parents then teachers and then the law which is the highest authority that govern a society.

So, if someone claim to be your son, they have to provide their DNA test to you and you go do your own test to find out or you can ignore until criminal charges is filed.

Who do you think decide what is ethical or not?

How many countries approve gay marriage, abortion, death sentence... while why others does not? And does that mean every citizen approve it?

Why some countries still fighting for an island and who can decide its ownership?

Who wrote the rules of human rights and who can force others to practice it?

Who am I to say it should be and who are you to say it shouldn't?
Your answer is in these questions and form your conclusion.

I don't hold any secret because I am not the person to allow or disallow, you can't seems to grasp the concept of written law and the unwritten rules of ethics and moral code but wait, you are acting dumb and I dislike your mockery when you turn against me when you ran out of topic to post.

Only people involve in enforcement and education has the say of what should & should not, we don't do things that will agitate others being a nuisance, people who do that are inconsiderate and need to be disciplined but in your case, it is too late and must commit an act that trigger the alarm to restrict by the authority.

Stepping on the picture or show your butt to our prime minister and post it on the web has become a topic to debate, and the 114 internet law is created recently, you think human by default is allowed to do anything but we are born into a society with many disciplines both behavioural and academical.

Stem cell research and human cloning is one of the example and you can go find out why it is not allowed and then who allow them based on what secret.



If you understand the questions above not necessary knowing the answers, you will not think I've decided not to share the reasons which I don't have, it is only logical that individual's opinion does not overwhelm the law maker or the rules practiced by the majority.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Nov 4 2012, 10:14 PM

I had to use two distinctive colour to make it clearer because you are ignoring my point, you now say it is RWI but yet insinuate that I kept secret, my post only show how silly you are.

1. If that is the law, you go challenge the law, I am not stupid enough to say it should or shouldn't because it is never my choice nor yours.

2. The term moral can be according to individual's ideology just like the example I gave about the duo who posted their sex video online and promote free sex, they claimed that it is their rights and no existing law to prohibit such immoral practice, so who should determine whether it is allowed or not is the relevant authority not you or me.

Somebody saying it is illegal in England, why are you looking for the answer in a private forum in Malaysia? You should ask the bar council or consult a lawyer, the most we can offer is our personal views here in PhD school, so if someone convinced you eating shit will make you clever, you go eat shit?

PS: A public forum can only offer you similar or different opinions, not for you to acquire credible info nor to champion your ego.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Nov 7 2012, 02:33 PM

Now that is speaking frankly, I do not agree for anyone to test my DNA freely and do anything behind my back that concern me, I believe that is the basis of human rights. While you believe anything is allowed should be referring to beneficial rather than intrusive matter.