Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nokia 808 - V03 - [The King of Camera Phones], the legendary 41mp phone cam hidden gem

views
     
realjazzcoke
post Apr 16 2013, 10:42 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Apr 16 2013, 10:05 AM)
808 PureView or Phase 1 has dedicated imaging processor, for this Windows Phone might not be able to support it yet during Lumia 920, besides Windows Phone still has no support for higher end processor, there's quite a lot of limitation of Windows Phone which they're slowly improving now. Moreover, I think it doesn't support the high megapixel of 808 PureView and other features that are available on the 808 PureView or Symbian OS itself. Due to the OS belongs to MS, Nokia can't make any modifications, so they have to rely on MS and it's up to MS whether they want to incorporate it into their OS and if they do, most likely it will not be specially for Nokia, which means others can have this features as well.
This oso 1 of the factor that limits the proper PV to be ported to WP. Well said smile.gif But what to do, they signed up with MS... fated d.. cry.gif

QUOTE
For camera phone with shutter speed control, I'm not sure about those "stock" camera software, but for 3rd party, yes. One of is the Nokia N900 with FCam mod. We can control the shutter speed and set to 1 second to play with slow shutter effects, we can even force the ISO to 6400.
I see, at least now im certain that we dont get this priority setting with stock camera software most often. 2.7 sec is stil alot to play for those who knows about photography cool2.gif But i do understand the flexibility of adjusting the shutter speed directly, rather than getting approx figures by relying on ISO. Such a pity, but like Guru Damain has mentioned b4 on this topic... u cant pleased everyone and limitations are there.

QUOTE
808 PureView tends to use slower shutter speed so the result is usually blur due to shake or movement. Depends on what you shoot often, for me, I prefer to get the shot than get many blurry images. It makes the camera much more usable for most people, most of the time, we take the camera phone out we wanna take the shot immediately/quickly to capture the moment, not spending time to mess with the settings.
A good example would be my S3 vs 808, it's easier to take photo with the S3 even with no dedicated shutter button and taking the photo with one hand in lowlight, it gives higher hit rate with less blurred photo without messing with the settings at all. This is also why iPhone camera is preferred by many.
Lumia 920 have optical stabilizer, but the auto mode seems to favor slower shutter speed because it have this optical stabilizer, so... taking moving subjects is a no-no, e.g. taking your kids. Just look at test results or comparison reviews of L920 compared with competition, when it comes to moving subject, it fails terribly, but for those who loves to capture foods, toys, will love it.
Nokia needs to realize that it's more important to capture the moment than keep getting fail images; when taking foods, toys, usually these are not "action" moments, means the user can take their time to adjust the settings before shoot, or change the mode to "Food" (or some creative mode which utilizes the slow shutter speed, e.g. Night Mode in common camera modes). For "action" moments, usually you want to quickly capture the moment, you take the camera out and you want to capture immediately. (e.g. your kids doing something cute, your pet doing something cute, etc).
*
Loud and clear bro! Indeed this will ruin the photos in most of the fast moving & low light scene (That is why, myself 99% use pureview, 1% auto for others use my phone to taking shots for me laugh.gif ). and the success rate for 808 is low (for single shot pass). 808 nid patience and time in order to get the best image out of the it. To overcome slow shutter, Im now learning to get steady on 1/30, sometimes in 1/8-10 on food shots, stil some slight blur, but at least better now. Practice practice sweat.gif

Side note: Im actually quite OK with some low light shots up to ISO 800 sometimes, if for facebook, printouts, but DEFINITELY not for ZOOMING (ala attention to detail purposes laugh.gif )

realjazzcoke
post Apr 16 2013, 01:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Apr 16 2013, 12:53 PM)
For ISO and Noise; depends on each user, those that capture human moving subject or moments, it's more important to capture the moment than blur shot. Beside, when resize to smaller resolution, it will not be so bad, usually people post to Facebook under mobile uploads, it's already resize to small resolution, moreover most people view it in their phones, it will usually look OK or good, not to mention photos do look better on those modern phone display... and viewing in small size/screen.

Anyway, 808 PureView is in a totally different league, if one appreciate it's 38MP it offers, and the PureView mode which offers true lossess zoom which gives equally good feature like an optical zoom with constant aperture. When I use 3MP PureView Mode and zoom to the fullest, it can maintain somewhat similar shutter speed, and with true lossess zoom, you get great amazing details even zoom to the fullest. On other phone cameras, you will see BIG difference when compared....

Below is a simple comparison I done previously, just look at how great is 808PV even when using it's MAXIMUM 3MP PureView Mode zoom and somemore at 100% CROP.... with S3, it looks like poor CCTV footage screen capture.

[attachmentid=3394758]
*
That is the true intention on the Pureview tech. Easy sharing great photos with compact file size! We leave 38Mp to the professional to deal with laugh.gif . haha

I still remember this original post from you... totally no comparison bro! the lossless zoom already take a huge lead on detail, not yet compare pureview pixel sampling tech yet.

Nowadays less seeing you post pic! Hope to see some soon thumbup.gif
realjazzcoke
post Apr 16 2013, 02:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Apr 16 2013, 02:18 PM)
My pics mostly private family/kids photo ma, hehe  tongue.gif

Previously was testing or trying out the 38MP and PureView Lossless Zoom, so got take more. There's always shifu aspire with all his amazing photos~
*
Ic ic brows.gif . but stil hopefully can have more 808 users to join sharing ma~some ordinary stuff or food (got member complain on food pics coz got puasa...betahan d temptations...lolz) Sifu aspire 38mp gallery will crash browser...haha

At least glad to know u trigger happy with 808 thumbup.gif
realjazzcoke
post Apr 16 2013, 04:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(stephen2282 @ Apr 16 2013, 03:20 PM)
The quality of the photos are so good!! yawn.gif my dad gonna love this.

How is the PV808 holding up as everyday smartphone? Like browsing or wechat, whatsapp those.

What is the price of AP set now? o.O
*
Camera is the best to date, but it is not easy to use compared to compact P & S, and also refer my earlier discussion with andy214, by default 808 is on lower side on shutter speed, meaning shaky & blury shots is going to happen, that you might nid some skill to overcome at first...

Minus some random crash, hang, 2days not a problem. But still depends on individual usage. sweat.gif

Browsing not reli that recommended, nid to do alot of scrolling and zooming due to low res screen. Recommend Opera mobile for better browsing experience.

Wechat 4.2.0. is usable, but not that great, especially on typing, it will revert to fp1 keyboard...also for Chinese user, u have to set your keyboard to chinese input before starting Wechat, or else it will crash when you start to type.

Whatsapp no frills though smile.gif

Erm.. i duno about the pricing though, mayb u can look into garage sales~
realjazzcoke
post Apr 16 2013, 04:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Apr 16 2013, 04:30 PM)
Pics I took recently using 808PV hehe:
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

All uploaded directly to Flickr without any editing. BTW, I noticed it's not easy to focus on small stuff without zooming. That flower pic, I had to zoomed a bit....so it's not using the full sensor size.  doh.gif
*
Dont worry, it is normal, because the default distance is 15cm compared to 10cm on N8, dont be afriad to use the lossless zoom when you nid to do serious macro shots!

Keep up! thumbup.gif
realjazzcoke
post Apr 20 2013, 05:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(ulwan25 @ Apr 20 2013, 04:49 PM)
since when the original got speaker hole??

btw, im still surprised that almost all of you are fine with the banding issue.. im talking about low light photos and videos.. ok, i get it, high iso cannot go but for low light video?? I AM VERY SURPRISED ALL OF YOU DIDN'T COMPLAIN!!
*
FYI, Someone in LYN already selling revised version (with cap speaker hole) since Jan 2013 https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2441535/all
realjazzcoke
post Apr 22 2013, 03:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(ulwan25 @ Apr 20 2013, 07:18 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

this is the prototype of 808, notice the fast zoom feature (now slow down a bit but its fine for me)

and don't tell me you guys didn't notice the weird flashy blue light and major noise distortion (purely detail but purely ugly distasteful color noise!!) came out on the video,
i was hoping for nokia to fix the problem both photo/video but they didn't..
this is a HUGE mistakes made by Nokia and I can't see why people are ignoring it..

IT BOTHERS ME A LOT!!! A LOT!!!
*
Do you still have some shots of yours that indicates the problem as stated? care to share?

As far as I'm using it till now, minor noise on low-light shots was normal, at least acceptable to my eye. Others issues like inaccurate indoor WB, slow shutter on auto modes, these i can live with it. The image quality for low-light already surpassed my P&S 12MP Canon SX200 (minus the optical zoom). Not to mention in daylight, 808 dominates my compact camera in overall image quality. Examples of my recent experimental lousy low light shots, comments are welcome:

Handheld (low-light)
-----------------------
user posted image
1/10sec, ISO400, EV -0.7

user posted image
1/12sec, ISO400, EV -1.7 (still think that should go lower on EV, but just a quick shot)

user posted image
1/8sec, ISO500, EV -1

Stabilizing tools used (evening)
-------------------------------------
user posted image
1/8sec, ISO800, EV+1

user posted image
2.7sec, ISO50, EV+1 ND not sure izit on or off (as if the scene was low light enuf, it can still achieve 2.7 sec without ND)

Nokia no longer going to produced any Symbian phone as we know, if it is a hardware issue, you can only hope for the WP series. Period. BUT, are you certain that this fix can be carried out by software hmm.gif ?

Still, im still amazed that these images actually comes from a cameraphone brows.gif you can visit the gallery for more sifu's action on 808 performance icon_idea.gif (38MP Full resolution Gallery tongue.gif )
realjazzcoke
post Apr 23 2013, 11:43 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(ulwan25 @ Apr 23 2013, 03:19 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
No problem, at least to me is still new...haha. I haven't gone up to ISO1600 before (nor i will going to), doh.gif as for those discussion shots, both in ISO1600, i mentioned earlier, either u wan steady shot with noise, or blur shot with no noise, your call. To me, at least both shots are pretty usable (Judging by those situations) And for what i can see from the shot, it can actually achieve much better results without cranking up to ISO1600 (the stuffed toy pic, since the shutter speed is 1/614, for me, 1/100 or 1/50 is enough to get a clear shot, in the same situation, with reduced ISO level, T & C apply la laugh.gif ). To tell you the truth, even my Canon SX200 ISO1600 is worst that 808.

All your listed cameraphone have their own unique, something you must know that, 808 evolved from those models, without them, no PureView today. Either they are good or bad, they are still the reference camera that Juha's team take in to consideration to create the sensor room and optic size for 808, with the collaboration with Carl Zeiss.

There is no such thing as best cameraphone "forever" edi, only time will tell, maybe best cameraphone on certain era, yes, i agree. Have you noticed how Samsung tops their best Galaxy every year to wow the crowd? How long will the top last ?

How sure you know that this is a small problem anyway? not always software do the magic part, hardware & components are crucial too.

High ISO originally will naturally create more noise in reality (even PureView Tech wont save you from this, as super pixel sampling process with noise at the end you will still get... noise). You do alot of night shots without flash often? prefer high shutter speed priority? In that case, may i suggest that you consider a real DSLR or camcorder? Big names like C, N or S have been in this field more than 10 -20 years or more. It is time to move on bro! You already known 808's weakness, and yes, every phone has its own weakness tongue.gif

Cameraphone is still just a "camera" phone, it will not going to replace the DSLR or dedicated professional imaging tool in future.

I hope you are happy with your 808 while it was still alive back then... sweat.gif

This post has been edited by realjazzcoke: Apr 23 2013, 11:45 AM
realjazzcoke
post Apr 23 2013, 02:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(labo0 @ Apr 23 2013, 02:42 PM)
Guys.. wanna ask sumting.. how bout its battery life?
*
A popular question. But, very dependent on individual's usage. Mind to share some input on what kind of activity you would like to conduct in 808? biggrin.gif
realjazzcoke
post Apr 23 2013, 03:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(labo0 @ Apr 23 2013, 02:49 PM)
a lot of snapping picture but mostly wont use flash.. and gps purposes..
*
Thanks.

Camera is one thing that going to drain the battery real quick (especially daylight shots when u nid to bright up the screen to the max). Approx 3 hrs on snapping & video recording should be fine. Same to GPS, i tried using Garmin on almost 4hrs straight, after that left about 20%.

Above ratings are not accurate, i too using Nokia battery monitor readings for evaluation. Oso other factors like how long to take a shot, time of reviewing after the shots will also affect the usage.

I would recommend mobile charger or the spare BL-4D (1200mAH) should come in handy if you are going to shoot alot of pics.

During my holidays i think i can snap up to 100+ of shots, GPS for 10-15 mins per every trip and do some basic online activity on the same day and it can withstand 1 day + (Offline at night when going to sleep) But for the next day any moment u will nid to recharged again (due to usage).

realjazzcoke
post May 8 2013, 12:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Andy214 @ May 8 2013, 09:54 AM)
Same with 808 or most Nokia cameraphone? It tends to use slower shutter speed. That's why I emphasize that they should include Shutter Priority mode. It's especially important for those who shoot family photos, especially kids, they won't just stay there and let you shoot.

Talk about this, Nokia Malaysia FB did post a misleading photo for promoting L920, it's about 1 bird is trying to capture another bird and ask the bird not to move. Hello??? Optical Stabilizer won't help if the subject moves ler, in fact it will be worst because with optical stabilizer in auto mode, the camera may tend to use slower shutter speed most of the time.
That's why I emphasize Nokia should include Shutter Priority mode. It's also better in a way where while you're shooting you move around or lighting condition changes, then the camera auto choose lower ISO or higher ISO, while you're still maintaining the shutter speed, so when you move to a better lighting area, the ISO may be much lower and you may get better quality images. If you fix the ISO at highest, you're stuck with this, and if you need to change, you may not know the good ISO to use when it change or you may not have time to keep changing.
For small sensor, it's easier to do as there is much more DOF. And you see many of those apps which offer Lytro like feature, they usually produce smaller resolution photos which is easier to do and you need to capture few photo of the scene with different focus.
Another way is using VIDEO, focus at the closest then focus to the furthest, then extract out the images.
Small sensor easier, get those photos where everything seems to be in focus, generate into smaller resolution, sharpen it so everything looks clear and sharp. Now you wanna change focus, then use software to generate blur/OOF effect or bokeh effect on those not in focus. Kakaka.
The main issue is when people shoot closeup, how to get everything to be in focus, clear and sharp.
*
Interesting!

Hopefully in future there are cameraphones with shutter speed priority from any big names (still, Nokia preferred biggrin.gif ) , reli looking forward to it!

Until then, cameraphones are still striped down version from proper camera. give them some time to improve on this field (hopefully they can go further with accs in future to work will real interchangable lenses~, just as Juha's custom 808 proto version, coz that way u can reli make use of the 41MP sensor sweat.gif haha )

As family photo and kids shots, Xenon flash will come in handy icon_idea.gif ,but, i usually lower some EV 1st in order to get a more natural atmosphere and better results (my experience.. not pro ya), not to mention higher priority on shutter speed (as opposed to higher ISO, ultra steady handling and virtually impossible non-moving object/human in low light condition = noisy pic) minor red-eye issue can be remedied by some 3rd party apps or basic editing software on PC. Abit of extra work sweat.gif

Nokia still have EOS and the coming soon L928 (xenon version) to entertain us~ icon_rolleyes.gif
realjazzcoke
post May 8 2013, 01:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Andy214 @ May 8 2013, 12:49 PM)
Personally, I don't really like the output of direct flash and shooting with flash can be quite distracting too and the delay is also there. Without flash you can fire multiple shots easily.
Noise is not that bad when you're capturing the moment because you will appreciate it if you can capture the moment than totally failed shot. The S3 still usable even the pic is noisy, if the 808 can do this well at capturing moment, it will be a fun and easy to use by many people. Too bad Damian left, in one of the user's comment, he replied to the user's request for Shutter Priority positively... but 808 may not have further improvement already anyway.

Yup, looking forward for the next PureView, hopefully it will have Phase 1 + Phase 2, a proper TRUE Phase 2. But read rumors that it will have variable aperture lens?
*
Ya, those are the drawbacks of flash, i only reserve this method when i urge the need for speed and i only got 1 shot to do (when ppl are not directly looking at the camera, more on action shots rather than normal potraits). Indeed multiple shots are not a option when flash comes in. But 808 ISO 800 does gives usable results too, if lower a little EV @ night.

I saw the user request on Damian twitter, and he did reply that comment, not all can be done at 1 stage, and they cant pleased everyone with all with their settings, as the user is the final result of how the phone actually performs, not in Nokia's hand.

Yes, that was part of the rumors too, hopefully can make it to May 14 icon_rolleyes.gif Nokia still have plenty to come!
realjazzcoke
post May 8 2013, 03:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Andy214 @ May 8 2013, 02:32 PM)
Yup, usable, if you downsize and view at smaller resolution, it's very much usable. Anytime better than any camera phone; that's why I really hope it will give more priority to shutter to let us capture the moment.

The comment, later the user replied the purpose and reason for Shutter Priority and Damian agrees about and then give a positive feedback, something like it can/will be considered or something.
Actually, it's just a matter whether they wanna provide it, as a camera centric phone, it should stand out from the typical camera phone and offer good camera features. Shutter Priority is considered basic mode only, if they can offer Manual mode even better, if got more controls like detailed WB adjustment, then I think many photographer will loving the 808 and Nokia could have make a difference. Just too bad...

Yeah, really hoping it to be announce on May 14.  thumbup.gif
*
808 served well as the last Symbian pioneer, out of the 5 years on making the PV project, 1 or 2 of the recent years Nokia has done a deal with MS, so im glad this phone not end up as a prototype. And as fated, most of the tech will move to their MS product, rather than focusing on Symbian, still, it is considered lucky to have their final bits for 808 when compared what happened to Maemo and Meego OS.

The PureView team do knows the ups and down with the shutter, but, considering and implementing are different cases, maybe this barrier of the essential "proper" camera feature is still not ready for now(as i mentioned before, or mungkin i ulu klang~ Paiseh ya sweat.gif , i yet to see any "official" cameraphones from any big names that offers real manual shutter control from stock till now. I know there are 3rd parties software overrides, but did they work as advertised?)

808 indeed can do way better, if wasn't the flag changed to MS cry.gif

Hopefully the May 14th terbalik reli shows a hint of 41MP EOS this time around...lolz laugh.gif
realjazzcoke
post May 8 2013, 04:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Andy214 @ May 8 2013, 03:42 PM)
Yup lucky didn't end up as prototype. The 808 help make Nokia famous and set another record in camera phone history.

Actually, I believe those features like Shutter Priority can be implemented easily for them because they have all the access to the core of the OS codes. For 3rd party app, in easier to understand way, they may not be able to provide this function because they the original camera function or the coding already don't have this provided to those 3rd party app to access, so they can only access to what already available only. Those 3rd party app that offer "shutter speed", could be not a direct approach. For example, if you choose shutter speed of 1/125,  the app will try to simulate what ISO to use so the camera will use shutter speed of 1/125 and choose the ISO, maybe that's why it won't always work.
For Nokia, they have access to the base source code and all the camera hardware and software, they can easily do it.
For N900/Maemo, it's a very open OS, and people was able to make changes to it more easily at base level.

WP7 was not that good with many limitations. WP8 is much better, so it will be nice to have proper PureView.
The best thing about WP for me is the Social Networks Integration.
*
Hopefully your are right on that, i would like to see this happen, as many of us do. This will even the cameraphone capable on tackling some difficult situations when flash was restricted and shutter priority are high.

Bro, u do have a N900 rite? can request some shots from the camera ah? now Im interested on seing some shots from shutter priorities wan, mayb some cars/plane/birds(haha...izit possible?) Not for the sake of the quality, is just for the right shot to take at the right moment feel. If canot nvmd ya tongue.gif

Maemo is the only OS that i didn't have a chance to play around.. sigh...
realjazzcoke
post May 13 2013, 12:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(aspire2oo6 @ May 12 2013, 08:59 AM)
its pointless the issue here lies in nokia and not the devices. Nokia do not have full commitment in their devices if you notice they dont plan ahead on how to push the devices limit but end up limiting it.

Even Samseng sux they still have a proper pattern to follow

S1 ---> 1 year later ----> S2 -----> 1 year later S3--------> 1 year later S4

There a pattern and improvement we can see

while nokia lumia 900 come out -------> 4months later --------> lumia 920 --------> 5months later maybe ------> lumia 930. The biggest joke is its heck of expensive and the price can drop within few months.

The problem here nokia do not focus and design their flagship.
*
Sifu, my statement is there:

"808 served well as the last Symbian pioneer, out of the 5 years on making the PV project, 1 or 2 of the recent years Nokia has done a deal with MS, so im glad this phone not end up as a prototype. And as fated, most of the tech will move to their MS product, rather than focusing on Symbian"

I was mentioning Nokia not the device itself all the time, Im not sure which point i mentioned doesn't reflect to them. The reason i said that is because we know once Nokia has alliances with MS, no longer they will focus on Symbian (Not on hardware or software). Period. So how to push to the limit when there is no more people involve on Symbian? even apps developer already long gone...And Guru Damian..

Yes, i c how Sammy doing their flagship (and they do mean flagship as they topped their flagship every year), But when you are comparing some company who owns every component of the phone, we are way out of our league to compare. Nokia might look big on phone industry now, but Sammy is huge on all sorts of electronics industry. And they do not have to worry about the OS (applies to Sony, Moto, HTC...) Unlike Nokia, they have to work closely to MS, even on product launch date (Remember L920?)

Flagship is not always being about topping the device on all aspect every year(i can see Sammy is breaking the rules here, for now). Nokia acquire camera industry tech not for nothing. Until then we just see tomorrow what Nokia have to offer biggrin.gif

QUOTE(Andy214 @ May 13 2013, 09:52 AM)
I guess it's still not stable and they don't have something good to sell. See L920, and the new L928... L928 is more or less the same like L920.... using PureView OIS technology only. And both running Windows Phone OS, both are really not much different unlike Androids, there will be different looking theme/UI for the different versions at least.
*
I agree with Andy's statement on this, They currently have nothing much to offer, and they have to force some improper "flagship" to tease the market 1st. Since Windows Phone OS not able to steal the show, they have to rely on PureView Badge to do so.

This post has been edited by realjazzcoke: May 13 2013, 04:17 PM
realjazzcoke
post May 13 2013, 04:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Everdying @ May 13 2013, 04:20 PM)
btw one thing that really bugs me about the 808 is touchscreen sensitivity at the edges.
*
Reli? hmm... seldom face such problem, u mean on camera interface where it might mis-press some other options come out?
realjazzcoke
post May 13 2013, 05:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


i get what u mean now, paiseh... tongue.gif i think is due to the sms interface which was too edge to the corner screen. It is hard to register the cursor precise on the left edge corner. If the text input corner are nested within a box (a few mm inwards). I think it will be better, and fp2 cursor sucks.. i rather exchange d smiley with cursors. Still, aint reli complaining coz i do have large thumbs sweat.gif ....
realjazzcoke
post May 13 2013, 10:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Everdying @ May 13 2013, 05:49 PM)
ya, but of cos not only sms la.
any textbox that opens up is the same, like thru opera.

i dont think its interface, it feels more like not calibrated properly at the edges...cos eg. samsung dont have this issue.
also doesnt help that 808 has no option to calibrate the screen yourself.
*
After testing with 2 andriod phones (lenovo s890 and samsung galaxy s advance) my experiences as follows:
Lenovo s890 : superb precision, never have any issue from any part on right to the left edge. (i think large screen got its advantages here, wild guess)
Galaxy S Advance : before calibration, hit rate is like 50%, after calibration 60%, but i think is due to my large thumb oso..haha

Im do not own any andriod phones, so nid to borrow for testing~ sweat.gif

My conclusion: kindly refer to the blue triangle indicated on each phone model's keyboard, im not sure izit every android keyboard layout was different. For Lenovo S890 & Galaxy S adv, there are some gaps there, but in 808, there was actually the least gap from the screen edge (not from bezel) So Im suprised i still get 50% hit despite of how my thumb is going to squeeze in that space for fp2 keyboard sweat.gif , although i still think it might be the interface design issue, but dont take my word for it, as i yet to test all of the android phones...

Attached Image

This post has been edited by realjazzcoke: May 13 2013, 10:13 PM
realjazzcoke
post May 14 2013, 09:39 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


This is how my 808 reacts.. tested on 1 hand while looking at N8 screen during recording session on the other hand (not looking at 808)

Mind my thumb~haha thumbup.gif

I do not get much andriod experience as im the only one not using andriod in my community...sorry

This is just a simulation test, i think in actual the hit rate might be lower, since im using N8 as my primary (and still learning how to get used to FP1 QWERTY, my hit rates was reli low )

Note: i aint texter, so im slow on typing on touchscreens, miss my n97mini keyboard cry.gif

This post has been edited by realjazzcoke: May 14 2013, 10:40 AM
realjazzcoke
post May 14 2013, 10:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
490 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Everdying @ May 14 2013, 10:08 AM)
ah k...my kb i use the swype one since i dont really 'type'.
so another thing that bugs me...sometimes when i hit space bar...it somehow detects it as the 'right arrow' below it...and the cursor jumps to the beginning...
and i cant tell if this is another calibration issue or software...
*
On older device like n97 mini, there is screen calibration (but maybe is just to accommodate the use of stylus, so might nid the extra precision), Symbian ^3 no longer have this option.

I dont use swype, tried b4, but i manyak bodoh wan.. coz i dont formal in texting....now learning to type properly on N8 portrait KB is a pain to the @ss..haha

Hopefully there are some remedies on the KB usability issue when the new updates arrived. The cursor placement is also 1 of the questionable usability to old timer KB user too.

5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0519sec    0.19    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 03:46 AM