Auditioned the M50 and first impression is that it is significantly better than those typical desktop 2.1 systems out there. But SQ wise, is still far apart compared to the likes of T200B / M200MKIII / H5 (The ones that I got to audition).
T200B is really very detailed but will not be for those with size constraints. As for M200MKIII, although separation is very good, it is not to my liking as I find it a tad too airy. As for H5, soundstaging is not as wide as T200B. Listening to it also isn't very fatiguing.
If the majority of usage of the sound system is towards music, I would say T200B is the one to go for. But if there is a mix in terms of usage (i.e. 33% gaming, 33% music, 33% movies), I would say H5 + H10 is a better choice (Came across H4 reviews and it seems the SQ of H4 compared to H5 is definitely different with H4 performing better in the highs).
This post has been edited by mizumi: Mar 12 2013, 04:08 PM
PC Audio HiVi / SWAN - Active Speakers (Version 2015), Back and Active
Mar 12 2013, 04:05 PM
Quote



0.0426sec
0.41
7 queries
GZIP Disabled