No, it's more but loose, uncontrolled. But I do think they had too much foam. I wish to try those foam that are more airy and less dense.
PC Audio HiVi / SWAN - Active Speakers (Version 2015), Back and Active
PC Audio HiVi / SWAN - Active Speakers (Version 2015), Back and Active
|
|
Jul 17 2013, 12:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
13,476 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
No, it's more but loose, uncontrolled. But I do think they had too much foam. I wish to try those foam that are more airy and less dense.
|
|
|
Nov 17 2022, 06:07 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
13,476 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE(almostthere @ Nov 15 2022, 12:12 AM) I do agree with you as the specs do appeal to me altho am curious to the following I think you got it wrong on the bass. I saw a review on S880 vs D100. I was going to get the used S880 but cancelled my plan after watching the Vietnamese review. You can find them on youtube and try listen to it via speaker.1. The D100 is a non-ported cabinet design so I presume the bass dept would be reduced but I'd assume better control and detail, can someone confirm that (as it is the Edifiers I used to use are abit boomy as is even on stands (unballasted) so I can do with less impact but better detail) 2. The one appealing feature is that it has an optical in (previously used an ODAC to channel in audio from my PC to the R1700BT @ 24bit/96khz) but I'd like to know using the realtek onboard optical out what's the maximum bitrate playable thru Hivi's DSP as I frequently listen to SACD rips. 3. Are HiVi's sensitive to placement including distance from wall and toe? Thanks |
|
|
Dec 11 2022, 08:36 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
13,476 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0170sec
0.49
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 05:54 PM |