Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
119 Pages « < 15 16 17 18 19 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

English Clubs Liverpool FC- The Kop Talk 2012, Liverpool 1-2 ManU

views
     
dragontongue88
post Sep 7 2012, 09:32 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: May 2012


QUOTE(Petre @ Sep 7 2012, 12:25 AM)
if the real reason for FFP is to make sure no more clubs fall like Leeds...

cant they just make sure every club's balance sheets are acceptable? lets say certain percentage of debt (if any)?

why manutd so supportive of the idea? well it just make you suspect, right?
*
Agree. I dont think it is so much about debts, think Man Utd have more debts than Chelsea or City. Correct me if I'm wrong, Chelsea or City are spending their owner's money, not the club's money. However, I don't believe they are saddling their clubs with debts. IMO FFP is mainly to stop clubs like Chelsea, City and PSG from spending so much. That is not bad thing, but one of the consequences of FFP could be Man Utd end up dominating, that is assuming that they can service their debts properly.

QUOTE(realshinjae @ Sep 7 2012, 05:19 AM)
Good updates this morning.
Samed Yesil scored twice against England U19's (Sterling & Morgan played).
Shelvy scored one and assisted another against Azerbaijan U21s (Kelly & Henderson played).

No better highlights found yet. tongue.gif

Samed Yesil Goals vs England U19's


*
Yesil's first goal looks good. Would have been nice to see the build up to that goal, he looks skillful. rclxms.gif Would like to see Rodgers fast tracking him into the first team, if Sterling can do it, I think Yesil can as well. The challenge is that in the premier league, he will have less time and space to take his shot. I think he'll play in the league cup.

QUOTE(bitebug @ Sep 7 2012, 09:15 AM)
Anyone remember this? Rafa rclxms.gif

*
I absolutely love it but I also think that is the beginning of his end at Liverpool. Maybe it is just a coincidence, but the team's form dropped off after that...
dillonyong
post Sep 7 2012, 09:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Puchong, Selangor


All that is left for Yesil to do is to say "Steady" and he is in the 1st team. Say "steady" Yesil! Say "Steady"
dragontongue88
post Sep 7 2012, 09:42 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: May 2012


QUOTE(Duke Red @ Sep 7 2012, 09:32 AM)
The thing about Man Utd is this. They did it the hard way. The didn't inherit billions to throw away on expensive benchwarmers. Their era of domination was built around homegrown talent which also featured a couple of foreign stars like Cantona, Kanchelskis or Peter Schmeichel. The bulk of the squad however consisted of local lads like Beckham, the Nevilles, Scholes, Butt, Giggs, etc. They then capitalised on their success by marketing the club to the world, something Liverpool failed to do during our era of dominance. If they did spend, the mancs spent money they earned, not inherited and even if they did splurge on a player, they did so because they have a healthy bank balance and cash flow.

FFP may seem to favour a club like Man Utd now because they are already at the pinnacle. However it also ensures that new filthy rich owners of clubs do not spend massive amounts of money just for short term gain. Man City may have garnered much more attention than they have before winning the Prem but they haven't earned any profit to reinvest into other areas of the club e.g. Youth development. How can a business entity be allowed to sustain itself on negative profit? In any other business, banks would have stopped loaning money to them as they did with us. We came that close to going into administration, we were days away in fact.

A TV breakaway deal would be unfair to smaller clubs hence why it wasnt passed.

It's a double edged sword like any proposal. It did state that even if clubs operate at a deficit for the year, consideration will be given if they are how they are headed in the right direction e.g. Investing in a new bigger stadium, improved facilities, setting up academies overseas, etc. in the short run, a club like Man Utd may benefit but in the long run, it addressed issues smaller clubs will have to deal with at some point if they want sustainability. A club like Newcastle for example, I see benefitting from this.
*
Agree with the part on Utd building their way up in the past. I do think it is fair that they are on top, they earn their way up there. I supposed it is the biasness in me due to being a Liverpool supporter, so much so I would be reluctant to see a rule that will benefit them most. blush.gif I do think however that certain incentives should be allowed for smaller teams to invest and to catch up with teams with big revenues such as Utd and Arsenal. If not, I think it will be hard for them to catch up with the larger teams.
vreis
post Sep 7 2012, 09:45 AM

Golden Past Red Future
******
Senior Member
1,658 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Spion Kop


QUOTE(dillonyong @ Sep 7 2012, 09:34 AM)
All that is left for Yesil to do is to say "Steady" and he is in the 1st team. Say "steady" Yesil! Say "Steady"
*
He ain't English so dunno steady...
so the conversation will be like this instead.
BR : mad.gif vmad.gif
Yesil : Stetig...stetig
BR : blink.gif hmm.gif rclxub.gif
dillonyong
post Sep 7 2012, 09:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Puchong, Selangor


QUOTE(vreis @ Sep 7 2012, 09:45 AM)
He ain't English so dunno steady...
so the conversation will be like this instead.
BR :  mad.gif  vmad.gif
Yesil : Stetig...stetig
BR :  blink.gif  hmm.gif  rclxub.gif
*
You should complete the whole conversation, buddy. biggrin.gif

BR : :You need to change your attitude!! vmad.gif
Yesil : Stetig...stetig
BR : hmm.gif Whatdick? You said "whatdick" one more time, you'll be on the first plane back to Berlin!
Yesil: blink.gif
BR: Yesil! You said "whatdick, Yesil. You said it.
Yesil: doh.gif

This post has been edited by dillonyong: Sep 7 2012, 09:57 AM
leftist
post Sep 7 2012, 10:11 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
734 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Sri Petaling


i told already its a blessing in disguise..without us buying any senior striker, the young ones will benefit..Yesil looks a class above Morgan in that game by scoring two goals..if Morgan can get a game in Europa, I cant see why Yesil cant get the same...it will lessen a lot of burden from Suarez..he'll get enough of rest for EPL games
Petre
post Sep 7 2012, 10:55 AM

Default Member Title
*******
Senior Member
4,334 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Shadow Striker
shit i cant hold myself from giving opinions.. although they are no more than just 2 cents lol

if wanna implement FFP, all clubs should start equal. if not what fair in financial fair play? i still think just let economics work themselves. if any club wanna risk being history, its their own doing. i think thats fair enough
madmoz
post Sep 7 2012, 11:08 AM

New Member
*******
Senior Member
4,250 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


the NBA system of salary cap seems to work fine, to a point anyways - the weak teams are still normally weak, with the exception of those who get real lucky in the draft or make outstandingly good trades.

you will still end up with 'super' teams like the Heat and Lakers, but that usually mean having locked up all your $$ on the five starters, your bench is average at best.

there are disadvantages though, in the attempt to even the playing field you are unfair to teams who developed their own talent - i.e OKC will not be able to keep all their homegrown stars eventually.

but that system is also impossible to implement in footie. the NBA is a very closed system - rigid in its structure. There's the draft and it is essentially only a single country. The NBA does not have any real tangible interaction with other b-ball leagues from other countries.

Football spans the world, and although it is true that Selangor will probably never ever play against say Liverpool competitively, top teams from Europe play each other yearly. They cannot even agree on a single monetary policy tongue.gif, so do you really expect them to be able to agree on something so trivial (in the larger sense of things, and sorry Shankly, I'm an accountant after all laugh.gif) as a unified football regime.
dillonyong
post Sep 7 2012, 11:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Puchong, Selangor


QUOTE(madmoz @ Sep 7 2012, 11:08 AM)
the NBA system of salary cap seems to work fine, to a point anyways - the weak teams are still normally weak, with the exception of those who get real lucky in the draft or make outstandingly good trades.

you will still end up with 'super' teams like the Heat and Lakers, but that usually mean having locked up all your $$ on the five starters, your bench is average at best.

there are disadvantages though, in the attempt to even the playing field you are unfair to teams who developed their own talent - i.e OKC will not be able to keep all their homegrown stars eventually.

but that system is also impossible to implement in footie. the NBA is a very closed system - rigid in its structure. There's the draft and it is essentially only a single country. The NBA does not have any real tangible interaction with other b-ball leagues from other countries.

Football spans the world, and although it is true that Selangor will probably never ever play against say Liverpool competitively, top teams from Europe play each other yearly. They cannot even agree on a single monetary policy tongue.gif, so do you really expect them to be able to agree on something so trivial (in the larger sense of things, and sorry Shankly, I'm an accountant after all laugh.gif) as a unified football regime.
*
It will come to a point when there is a need to control player's wages. It's getting ridiculous - player's wages and transfer fee. Inflation may soon destroy football.
chenwfng
post Sep 7 2012, 11:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
46 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(madmoz @ Sep 7 2012, 11:08 AM)
the NBA system of salary cap seems to work fine, to a point anyways - the weak teams are still normally weak, with the exception of those who get real lucky in the draft or make outstandingly good trades.

you will still end up with 'super' teams like the Heat and Lakers, but that usually mean having locked up all your $$ on the five starters, your bench is average at best.

there are disadvantages though, in the attempt to even the playing field you are unfair to teams who developed their own talent - i.e OKC will not be able to keep all their homegrown stars eventually.

but that system is also impossible to implement in footie. the NBA is a very closed system - rigid in its structure. There's the draft and it is essentially only a single country. The NBA does not have any real tangible interaction with other b-ball leagues from other countries.

Football spans the world, and although it is true that Selangor will probably never ever play against say Liverpool competitively, top teams from Europe play each other yearly. They cannot even agree on a single monetary policy tongue.gif, so do you really expect them to be able to agree on something so trivial (in the larger sense of things, and sorry Shankly, I'm an accountant after all laugh.gif) as a unified football regime.
*
Yea, the salary cap works in the NBA, but I don't know about football, may work and may not work. They should start implementing replays and goal line technology too like in Wimbledon.
Petre
post Sep 7 2012, 11:22 AM

Default Member Title
*******
Senior Member
4,334 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Shadow Striker
why did the idea of FFP came about? is it another plot specificly targetted at english teams?
dillonyong
post Sep 7 2012, 11:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Puchong, Selangor


And a better refereeing system. I am sick of referee making mistakes after mistakes. We should have gotten at least 1 penalty decision in our favor in the game against Arsenal but the linesman over rule it while referee easily gives penalty decision to other teams against us (ie: West Brom vs Liverpool)

Plain ridiculous. Liverpool always get bullied season after season.
Cloud0890
post Sep 7 2012, 11:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
128 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(Petre @ Sep 7 2012, 11:22 AM)
why did the idea of FFP came about? is it another plot specificly targetted at english teams?
*
or a French team? or that Russian team?
Petre
post Sep 7 2012, 11:25 AM

Default Member Title
*******
Senior Member
4,334 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Shadow Striker
QUOTE(dillonyong @ Sep 7 2012, 11:22 AM)
And a better refereeing system. I am sick of referee making mistakes after mistakes. We should have gotten at least 1 penalty decision in our favor in the game against Arsenal but the linesman over rule it while referee easily gives penalty decision to other teams against us (ie: West Brom vs Liverpool)

Plain ridiculous. Liverpool always get bullied season after season.
*
no thanks to refs not favoring suarez now. hence more reason for him not to be the main CF. i really pity him. sad to see him being treated like that. but good to see him still strong and keep going. just scared to face the day he say i give up, i have enough of this and leave...
vreis
post Sep 7 2012, 11:30 AM

Golden Past Red Future
******
Senior Member
1,658 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Spion Kop


QUOTE(dillonyong @ Sep 7 2012, 09:56 AM)
You should complete the whole conversation, buddy. biggrin.gif

BR :  :You need to change your attitude!!  vmad.gif
Yesil : Stetig...stetig
BR :  hmm.gif Whatdick? You said "whatdick" one more time, you'll be on the first plane back to Berlin!
Yesil:  blink.gif
BR: Yesil! You said "whatdick, Yesil. You said it.
Yesil:  doh.gif
*
laugh.gif

QUOTE(Petre @ Sep 7 2012, 10:55 AM)
shit i cant hold myself from giving opinions.. although they are no more than just 2 cents lol

if wanna implement FFP, all clubs should start equal. if not what fair in financial fair play? i still think just let economics work themselves. if any club wanna risk being history, its their own doing. i think thats fair enough
*
The clubs that let themselves in the red, sorry to say, its their own doing. clubs had been warned for years to keep their house in order. Why'd you think RM sold their training base to the local government back in early 2000s?
Though I'd agree to a certain extend on your view, but clubs that threw $$$ ard is akin to doping in financial sense. That is why UEFA so against it. Clubs like MU/Bayern are successful is due to their own prowess in keeping up with market & get their house in order, not getting $$$ from sugar daddy. It's their own hardworks that they get the headstart. No one prevent others from following their footsteps. So its unfair in your call to start equally, as its akin to ask Usain Bolt to run slower so other can catch up.... though its impossible to that anyway.

QUOTE(dillonyong @ Sep 7 2012, 11:16 AM)
It will come to a point when there is a need to control player's wages. It's getting ridiculous - player's wages and transfer fee. Inflation may soon destroy football.
*
This is the root cos of the probs...wages is spiralling outta control when u see someone can earn 250k/week.....whatever the currency is.
dillonyong
post Sep 7 2012, 11:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Puchong, Selangor


QUOTE(Petre @ Sep 7 2012, 11:25 AM)
no thanks to refs not favoring suarez now. hence more reason for him not to be the main CF. i really pity him. sad to see him being treated like that. but good to see him still strong and keep going. just scared to face the day he say i give up, i have enough of this and leave...
*
He wont give up that easily but it's just that the referees are an embarrassment to premier league week in week out. There are fans on the stand and millions of television viewers watching in disgust when referee make stupid mistakes and yet they are being protected by their Association and the FA.

It's just ridiculous. Nobody can criticize the referee or they will get into trouble with the FA. It's time to improve the standard of refereeing, introduce goal-line technology and sack the baldie Sepp Blatter. He's the good friend of controversies.
Duke Red
post Sep 7 2012, 11:39 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,112 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Earth


QUOTE(dragontongue88 @ Sep 7 2012, 09:42 AM)
Agree with the part on Utd building their way up in the past. I do think it is fair that they are on top, they earn their way up there. I supposed it is the biasness in me due to being a Liverpool supporter, so much so I would be reluctant to see a rule that will benefit them most.  blush.gif  I do think however that certain incentives should be allowed for smaller teams to invest and to catch up with teams with big revenues such as Utd and Arsenal. If not, I think it will be hard for them to catch up with the larger teams.
*
I get you. Gone were the days the likes if Blackburn could get promoted and win the title the next season but with business tycoons and conglomerates now seeing football as being a lucrative source of income, you can't tell this which clubs they should buy. Everyone is hoping for some rich dude to come along and invest in them.

QUOTE(Petre @ Sep 7 2012, 11:22 AM)
why did the idea of FFP came about? is it another plot specificly targetted at english teams?
*
English teams seem to be under scrutiny because they spend more than they counterparts. Almost twice as much. FFP also encourages the use of HG talent which is a good thing for England. Spain, Italy and Germany have no such issues.
chenwfng
post Sep 7 2012, 11:41 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
46 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


I'm not one to blame most of our loss on bookies cause we do play badly but the goal line technology not being introduced says a lot about the FA. Corrupted, maybe bookies at play behind the scenes?
Petre
post Sep 7 2012, 11:45 AM

Default Member Title
*******
Senior Member
4,334 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Shadow Striker
QUOTE(Duke Red @ Sep 7 2012, 11:39 AM)
I get you. Gone were the days the likes if Blackburn could get promoted and win the title the next season but with business tycoons and conglomerates now seeing football as being a lucrative source of income, you can't tell this which clubs they should buy. Everyone is hoping for some rich dude to come along and invest in them.
English teams seem to be under scrutiny because they spend more than they counterparts. Almost twice as much. FFP also encourages the use of HG talent which is a good thing for England. Spain, Italy and Germany have no such issues.
*
not so sure about this... this Blatter and Platini guy really care about football development huh... i mean what is this whole thing about homegrown anyway... if england never have any homegrown or talent to show... i'd say too bad lah... i dont know what the fuss is about... hmm.gif hmm.gif
dillonyong
post Sep 7 2012, 11:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Puchong, Selangor


QUOTE(Petre @ Sep 7 2012, 11:45 AM)
not so sure about this... this Blatter and Platini guy really care about football development huh... i mean what is this whole thing about homegrown anyway... if england never have any homegrown or talent to show... i'd say too bad lah... i dont know what the fuss is about...  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
*
Platini - maybe
Blatter? No way. The guy once said "Referee making mistakes is part of the game." "Any racist confrontation can end with hand shake". So there you go. I do believe FIFA is corrupted to the max judging by the controversies of World Cup host selection.

119 Pages « < 15 16 17 18 19 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0250sec    0.31    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th December 2025 - 01:38 AM