Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Samsung Galaxy S III I9300 Official Thread v17, JB Invasion is IMMINENT!!

views
     
Tookia
post Aug 25 2012, 07:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
290 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


Since Apple has won its suit agains Samsung, I wonder how the new lines of Samsung smartphones are going to be like? No longer smart? tongue.gif
Tookia
post Aug 26 2012, 08:03 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
290 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Aug 25 2012, 08:15 PM)
well pinch to zoom is an essential, so i can definitely see samsung having to pay for rights to use that feature. There are laws in place for apple to sell royalty rights at a fair price.

As for the smartphone hardware exterior design, this is the biggest question mark. now that the courts have a agreed apple owns rectangles and rounded corners, or literaly anything resembling what we would commonly think of as a smartphone/tablet, how then will it be possible for any other brand to make one without paying any royalties to apple ?

And therein lies the issue. Prices for competing non apple products will go up in price obviously (due to royalty fees in making the phones), because there is no way around this unless they can come up with a triangle shaped tire  laugh.gif
*
I'm sure other shapes will eventually catch on. Years ago some of Samsung's phones have oval shapes. Before iphones. most of the Nokia phones have more or less oval shapes.

user posted image

user posted image

How about this Sony ericsson phone design..may catch on.
user posted image
or this:
user posted image
Shape is less of a problem. It's the performance of the phones that's uniquely Samsung....the swipe to unlock the screen. Pinching to enlarge can be replaced by tapping..anyway does Apple have the monopoly on touch screens? Who owns the patent? Apple actually relies heavily on Samsung to deliver up to 25% of the iPhone 4′s parts. Among the components include the flash memory within, DRAM memory and the applications processor which basically makes the entire handset tick. If Samsung were to tell Apple to fly kites and outsource their parts from other sources, will that be counter productive? Or Samsung strong arm some deals...we provide you parts, in exchange you let us use your patents...or totally seek their own path? Knowing the Koreans they can eventually come up with something. I hate Apple for being so mercenary vmad.gif

This post has been edited by Tookia: Aug 26 2012, 08:17 AM
Tookia
post Aug 26 2012, 08:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
290 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Moogle Stiltzkin @ Aug 26 2012, 08:17 AM)
Also check what engadget said they thought on the matter. most of it was pretty spot on :/

http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/25/editori...samsung-ruling/
*
I support what James Trew says. "In fact, pre-Android and iOS, most mobile phones often looked and operated in much the same way, the difference was mainly in the hardware itself." Nokia was the taiko then..why it didn't sue the others? Because it is not as mercenary as Apple.Tim Cook...another Bill Gates in the making. Nokia's Symbian OS never improved and today it is losing money.

"Apple had the legal right to protect something, it did, and won. Fine. What is more galling is that the jurors seem to have missed an opportunity to question the validity (and by proxy, value) of these patents, and they didn't. Is Apple going this self-destructive path, the end of which is good for no one, not even Apple. "
I think Google and Samsung will not give up so easily as big bucks are involved.

If Apple license out their patents to Android makers the end result will be more expensive phones..and Apple having less competetion will produce mediocre phones. Have you noticed that the new ipad (so called ipad 3) is already in our stores without much fanfare? Its specs are nothing to shout about. Probably Apple is waiting to launch its mini ipad and iphone 5 and relegate the ipad 3 to the junk heap.

This post has been edited by Tookia: Aug 26 2012, 08:36 AM
Tookia
post Aug 28 2012, 08:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
290 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Ree73 @ Aug 28 2012, 08:23 AM)
with the lawsuit... samsung might remove the pinch and zoom function in any new release... Kind of weird without pinch in Android
*
I'm sure they will come out with something innovative. Knowing the Koreans,they have to.in order to survive.

Tookia
post Aug 28 2012, 08:58 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
290 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Long88 @ Aug 28 2012, 08:54 AM)
is it the pinch zoom is only remove by samsung?
how about third party apps that have that funtion?
browsers, photo albums. and i believe majority of us
using 3rd party apps and not samsung's stock gallery and browser.

or will the pinch zoom will apply to all other apps that using it too?

maybe they can stop samsung, but they cant stop the developers, hackers, etc.

just saying. maybe my point of view is wrong  blush.gif
*
These are the touch features apparently patented Patented gestures

This post has been edited by Tookia: Aug 28 2012, 08:59 AM
Tookia
post Aug 28 2012, 09:21 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
290 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


I wonder if anyone has patented the "middle finger" gesture? It would be interesting to see what it does to a touch screen...probably a message/voice replies "**** you!" brows.gif

user posted image
Tookia
post Aug 31 2012, 07:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
290 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


user posted image

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0369sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 01:52 AM