QUOTE(lkh6269 @ Nov 22 2012, 01:56 PM)
Hi guys,
Do you all know that those who bought corner lots at Anggun 2 are being charged monthly service/maintenance fee higher than RM180.00 stated in the DMC? This is strictly not proper, unfair, contractually and legally wrong. They are referring to a clause in S&P stating that the charges will be subjected to 3rd party valuation but simply ignore the DMC signed. The DMC is a binding document and they cannot simply ignore this, lest they are inviting legal action.
I agree that they have to base on something to work out the service and maintenance charges. It is normal to base on built up area and the bigger the built up area, the more you have to pay because more people is perceived to stay in that house and therefore should share the usage of the common facilities equally. To base it on the land size is totally not fair and acceptable at all.
The purpose for the service and maintenance charge is to take care of maintenance, repair, cleaning, rubbish disposal, grass cutting, etc for common facilities to be enjoyed by all equally. What is the size of the private land got to do with all this? The corner land is a private land and not common facility and why should they pay more? Will they come in and cut the grass and maintain the land as well? This is totally absurd and all corner lots owners and those lots has bigger than intermediate unit should protest this strongly.
Hi Ikh6269, Do you all know that those who bought corner lots at Anggun 2 are being charged monthly service/maintenance fee higher than RM180.00 stated in the DMC? This is strictly not proper, unfair, contractually and legally wrong. They are referring to a clause in S&P stating that the charges will be subjected to 3rd party valuation but simply ignore the DMC signed. The DMC is a binding document and they cannot simply ignore this, lest they are inviting legal action.
I agree that they have to base on something to work out the service and maintenance charges. It is normal to base on built up area and the bigger the built up area, the more you have to pay because more people is perceived to stay in that house and therefore should share the usage of the common facilities equally. To base it on the land size is totally not fair and acceptable at all.
The purpose for the service and maintenance charge is to take care of maintenance, repair, cleaning, rubbish disposal, grass cutting, etc for common facilities to be enjoyed by all equally. What is the size of the private land got to do with all this? The corner land is a private land and not common facility and why should they pay more? Will they come in and cut the grass and maintain the land as well? This is totally absurd and all corner lots owners and those lots has bigger than intermediate unit should protest this strongly.
I m one of the corner lot owners. And i was totally surprised when i received the invoice. Called up the office and was informed that the Strata Act carries more weight than DMC. Unfortunately needed to settle payment before collecting the key. Planning to move in, and later do a joint complaint with the other owners. Looking forward to reply from other owners too.
Dec 6 2012, 10:04 PM

Quote
0.0336sec
0.54
7 queries
GZIP Disabled