QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Oct 30 2012, 05:24 PM)
According to advanced country's research, be prepared to die in Pekatan-led states.
http://ec.europa.eu/transport/wcm/road_saf...cident_risk.htmAssessing potential effectiveness of speed reduction measures
Based on work by Nilsson in Sweden, a change in average speed of 1 km/h will result in a change in accident numbers ranging between 2% for a 120 km/h road and 4% for a 50 km/h road. This result has been confirmed by many before and after studies of different speed reduction measures. This relationship is used by other Scandinavian countries and by Australian and Dutch safety engineers.
A similar relationship is assumed in Britain, based on empirical studies by Taylor, where changes in accident numbers associated with a 1 km/h change in speed have been shown to vary between 1% and 4% for urban roads and 2.5% and 5.5% for rural roads, with the lower value reflecting good quality roads and the higher value poorer quality roads.
You need to get your facts right. Nobody is contradicting the effectiveness of the AES system. All people are saying is the implementation needs to be more effective and proper 'systems' need to be in place before the AES can be effective. Ive replied to you before and ill repeat it here again.
In Europe, speed limits are regulated and agreed upon by the local councils taking into account traffic volume, road design speed, urban development plans, climate, land geography and traffic zoning. In many countries in Europe, there are standard speed limits which are implemented across the country e.g for city centres, education zones and areas of lifestock. There are also stipulated limits which are enforced in bad weather or when approaching interchanges. And drivers need to be aware of all these limits when applying for their driving licence.
This, generally has not happened in Malaysia which is why you can get speed limits of 90kmph on a trunk road while the MEX highway with 3 beautifully constructed lanes has the same speed limit i believe. You also have numerous cases where the road has been upgraded to dual lane carriageways but the speed limit is still about 15 years old.
Firstly, for the AES system to work well in Malaysia, the speed limits would need to be regulated to demonstrate uniformity. In our current scenario, when the AES system is fully operational, alot of our attention while driving will be on keeping an eye on various speed limit signboards. This generally shouldn't be the case. If the speed limits are regulated, everybody would know that when you approach city limits for instance, your speed limit would be say 40kmph and you can then slow down. In many European countries, cars with on board GPS systems automatically track current speed limits and warn the driver. So the driver can stay focussed on the road instead of keeping an eye out for warning signs. Yes u still need to be aware of road signages of course but you wont need to be continously on the lookout for varying speed limits.
Secondly, the speed limits would need to be communicated in an effective manner to new and current drivers so that everybody is aware. Knowing these limits must be made mandatory to passing the driving exam. Existing drivers should be informed through the media as well. Also some of the locations of the AES are silly and surely not for the purpose of reducing accidents at that stretch.
Thirdly, Malaysia needs to beef up enforcement of traffic laws. Its pointless having the AES system to catch speeding vehicles and those who beat traffic lights but nothing much is done to eradicate blatant corruption by JPJ & PDRM which is becoming worse day by day. The corruption within JPJ has become so bad that now you dont even need to go to JPJ in order to get a driving licence if you pay the right person the right amount of money. How many of our lorry and truck drivers actually went through a driving test before getting their heavy vehicle licence? How many trucks out there have 'potong' chasis which 'passed' Puspakom inspections without even having the truck in Puspakom for an inspection? Ever wondered why certain overly laden timber lorries can pass through a JPJ roadblock easily while others get stopped? Try checking the stickers they have on their windscreens and you'll see a pattern. I know all this as first hand information btw.
In short, many Malaysians who oppose the AES are angry that somehow the Government is suddenly so keen on getting the AES system operational while nothing is being done to stop the rot among our enforcement agencies which should be the first priority if the Gov is serious about invoking a culture of respecting the law among Malaysians.
As long as JPJ continues to put unskilled and unqualified drivers on the road daily, the purpose of the AES will still be defeated. Accidents at the AES loctions might decrease but that doesnt mean accidents at other areas wont increase. The AES is supposedly a secondary system to lower accident rates but in Malaysia its being regarded as the primary method which should not be the case. Its like continously taking Panadol for a headache without dealing with the real cause of the headache.