How do we know salvator is the one who sold you the lens? Salvator already edited the thread that there are no more details of the item being sold.

Also, even if nikon reveal the 1st owner name later, how do we know if salvator used a different name to claim warranty thus not matching his real name in Lyn? Serial number is still the best.

---

Added on August 5, 2012, 2:43 pmSadly, people see this case as a student knowingly trying to cheat a working adult into buying a faulty product.

This post has been edited by sengih: Aug 5 2012, 02:43 PM

Hello dumbdumb, Izwan bought the lens FROM YOU not the first owner. You have to settle it with Izwan!

So salvator is your friend

Kudos to Silverfire? LOL

Yeap...an accomplice

Serial number? I don't recognise that serial number.

Can Izwan prove that its the same lens I sold him? No.
Does the receipt have the serial number of lens or my name on it? No.
Does the first service invoice have my name on it? No.

So you guys ask me to ask first owner for clarification. When I do, he's an accomplice.

Kudos to all the assholes here.

You got nuked so bad because your statement keep contradicting your other statement. Obviously you going to get nuked by everyone mate.

salvator just called me told the maximum he'd refund is RM300. Consequently, I can refund Izwan that amount and Izwan can keep the lens.

If Izwan cannot agree to that amount, Izwan can(if yet) file a police report against me and I can file a police report against salvator. As simple as that.

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Aug 5 2012, 05:14 PM

Like what?

RM500. Deal? Considering u're still a student...and that lens u can keep...it's useless already...

Are you trying to imply that TS was trying to frame you using the Same model lens you sold him and with the Exact serial number? Too many coincidences ,you yourself would know its impossible.

Please consider my offer

Check the post 24.

Final? Because I wont accept the refund from salvator if you do not agree to that amount and if salvator do not agree to the amount you demand, the police station will be the first place I'm visiting tomorrow.


I have no record for the serial number to begin with.


Sorry, I really don't get the pun.

RM300 not enough...

Seriously I don't understand why you all so love to nuke Silver...
Go clarify with the 1st owner if he got any serial number; or maybe to admit the warranty WAS already void.

1st of whatever (EVERYTHING) discussed in both treads can be manipulated and god knows the truth.

---

Added on August 5, 2012, 10:44 pmAnd I would never see a conmen who really want to con you, still keeping everything updated, show himself in facebook/forum, kept original thread unedited, and the list go on...
IF I were the con man I wont even appear here to even let you nuke me...

This post has been edited by IamNOT: Aug 5 2012, 10:44 PM

To answer your questions,

First of all,how TS confronts with the original owner if TS isn't the person who deal with him and doesn't even know him at all. 'Salvator' known as the original owner was revealed after countless complaints have been made towards Silverfire. At least for me, I never ever thought Silverfire as a conman but he's indeed at fault for selling it unintentionally w/ knowing it was already faulty and not to refund TS.

"IF I were the con man I wont even appear here to even let you nuke me..." Not relevant to the case but here you go since you have asked http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2163000 A great example for you to refer.

Totally agree

---

Added on August 6, 2012, 12:06 am

By mrnastey at 2012-08-05



Wow bro...is it a coincidence your successful tradelist same design with silverfire??

This post has been edited by Izwan898: Aug 6 2012, 12:10 AM

You should refund full amount of what TS had paid you. Not 1 cent less. Both salvator and you (if salvator really do exist) have a lot more to lose with the police investigations and all.

thats why i like LYN civil court

Have already texted salvator.