QUOTE(lucifah @ Feb 3 2006, 07:02 AM)
wow.. what's wrong with this? did the buyer promise in black & white that he will sell it to the higher's bidder?
is there any legal contract formed bnetween you and the seller?
no rite. so it's both parties fault. one for being ignorant about malaysian trade law. another for being not professional and has no ethic in trading
You are incorrect. An oral contract is as enforceable as a written contract. And in this case, the contract was in the auction. It is a very legitimate contract which the seller broke and the buyer has every right to feel aggrieved. If you don't know anything about Malaysian trade law yourself (or the law of contracts) don't mislead the general public.
QUOTE(lucifah @ Feb 3 2006, 11:54 PM)
well, 1st of all, LYN isn't a trading forum or site or whatever
the mods are there on ly to help
and the threadstarter is just yepping around, like some kids comlianing to their mama, except in this case, the mods aren't the mama
nobody was harmed in this case rite? so, no biggie
and i do not encourage ppl to FFK or what, but if u dun have a legal written contract, then nothing can be said. bring it to court, the supreme court if u wish, nobody can help. juat live with it. that's what i'm pointing out
the trade dispute zone is more like if money has been involved, where payment has been made, and item has not been received or not in the agreed condition, ie rosak punya item
There is no supreme court' in Malaysia. Legally speaking, the buyer may sue the seller here for breach of contract, but of course, thats another story for another day. I just wanted to correct your wrong statements so sellers here know their responsibilities.